股骨头病变药物涂层球囊再狭窄重复治疗后再狭窄复发的预测因素:RECURRENCE研究结果。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1002/ccd.31245
Takashi Yanagiuchi MD, Kuniyoshi Fukai MD, Koji Sogabe MD, Yoshihiro Iwasaki MD, Keita Hirano MD, Taku Kato MD, Hirokazu Yokoi MD, Kan Zen MD, Satoaki Matoba MD
{"title":"股骨头病变药物涂层球囊再狭窄重复治疗后再狭窄复发的预测因素:RECURRENCE研究结果。","authors":"Takashi Yanagiuchi MD,&nbsp;Kuniyoshi Fukai MD,&nbsp;Koji Sogabe MD,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Iwasaki MD,&nbsp;Keita Hirano MD,&nbsp;Taku Kato MD,&nbsp;Hirokazu Yokoi MD,&nbsp;Kan Zen MD,&nbsp;Satoaki Matoba MD","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the widespread use of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions, there is still no consensus on treatment strategies for DCB restenosis. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for recurrent restenosis after repeat DCB therapy for DCB restenosis in FP lesions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This multicenter retrospective study assessed 1176 consecutive limbs in 860 patients who successfully received initial DCB therapy for FP lesions at four cardiovascular centers between May 2018 and December 2022. Among these patients, 118 consecutive limbs of 104 patients treated via repeat DCB for primary DCB restenosis were enrolled.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The Kaplan–Meier estimate of freedom from recurrent restenosis was 74.6% at 1 year. Cox proportional hazard multivariate analysis revealed that recurrent restenosis was independently associated with the time from initial DCB to primary restenosis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79–0.92; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), history of ≥2 endovascular therapies (EVTs) (HR, 3.11; 95%CI, 1.36–7.12; <i>p</i> = 0.007), and PACSS grade 3 or 4 (HR, 2.76; 95%CI, 1.15–6.63; <i>p</i> = 0.023). Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of the time from initial DCB to primary restenosis to prevent recurrent restenosis was 12.6 months, with an area under the curve of 0.841 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Repeat DCB therapy for DCB restenosis might be an acceptable strategy, particularly for restenosis that occurred more than 12.6 months after initial DCB, given the rate of freedom from recurrent restenosis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"104 6","pages":"1241-1250"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of recurrent restenosis after repeat drug-coated balloon therapy for drug-coated balloon restenosis in femoropopliteal lesions: Results of the RECURRENCE study\",\"authors\":\"Takashi Yanagiuchi MD,&nbsp;Kuniyoshi Fukai MD,&nbsp;Koji Sogabe MD,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Iwasaki MD,&nbsp;Keita Hirano MD,&nbsp;Taku Kato MD,&nbsp;Hirokazu Yokoi MD,&nbsp;Kan Zen MD,&nbsp;Satoaki Matoba MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite the widespread use of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions, there is still no consensus on treatment strategies for DCB restenosis. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for recurrent restenosis after repeat DCB therapy for DCB restenosis in FP lesions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This multicenter retrospective study assessed 1176 consecutive limbs in 860 patients who successfully received initial DCB therapy for FP lesions at four cardiovascular centers between May 2018 and December 2022. Among these patients, 118 consecutive limbs of 104 patients treated via repeat DCB for primary DCB restenosis were enrolled.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Kaplan–Meier estimate of freedom from recurrent restenosis was 74.6% at 1 year. Cox proportional hazard multivariate analysis revealed that recurrent restenosis was independently associated with the time from initial DCB to primary restenosis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79–0.92; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), history of ≥2 endovascular therapies (EVTs) (HR, 3.11; 95%CI, 1.36–7.12; <i>p</i> = 0.007), and PACSS grade 3 or 4 (HR, 2.76; 95%CI, 1.15–6.63; <i>p</i> = 0.023). Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of the time from initial DCB to primary restenosis to prevent recurrent restenosis was 12.6 months, with an area under the curve of 0.841 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Repeat DCB therapy for DCB restenosis might be an acceptable strategy, particularly for restenosis that occurred more than 12.6 months after initial DCB, given the rate of freedom from recurrent restenosis.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\"104 6\",\"pages\":\"1241-1250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31245\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管药物涂层球囊(DCB)已广泛应用于股骨头(FP)病变的治疗,但对于DCB再狭窄的治疗策略仍未达成共识。本研究旨在确定FP病变DCB再狭窄重复DCB治疗后复发再狭窄的风险因素:这项多中心回顾性研究评估了2018年5月至2022年12月期间在四个心血管中心成功接受初次DCB治疗FP病变的860名患者的1176个连续肢体。在这些患者中,有104名患者的118个连续肢体因原发性DCB再狭窄而通过重复DCB治疗:1年后无复发再狭窄的Kaplan-Meier估计值为74.6%。Cox比例危险多变量分析显示,复发再狭窄与初次DCB到原发性再狭窄的时间独立相关(危险比[HR],0.85;95%置信区间[CI],0.79-0.92;P 结论:DCB治疗的复发再狭窄与初次DCB到原发性再狭窄的时间相关:考虑到复发再狭窄的发生率,针对DCB再狭窄的重复DCB治疗可能是一种可接受的策略,尤其是对于首次DCB治疗后超过12.6个月的再狭窄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of recurrent restenosis after repeat drug-coated balloon therapy for drug-coated balloon restenosis in femoropopliteal lesions: Results of the RECURRENCE study

Background

Despite the widespread use of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions, there is still no consensus on treatment strategies for DCB restenosis. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for recurrent restenosis after repeat DCB therapy for DCB restenosis in FP lesions.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective study assessed 1176 consecutive limbs in 860 patients who successfully received initial DCB therapy for FP lesions at four cardiovascular centers between May 2018 and December 2022. Among these patients, 118 consecutive limbs of 104 patients treated via repeat DCB for primary DCB restenosis were enrolled.

Results

The Kaplan–Meier estimate of freedom from recurrent restenosis was 74.6% at 1 year. Cox proportional hazard multivariate analysis revealed that recurrent restenosis was independently associated with the time from initial DCB to primary restenosis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79–0.92; p < 0.001), history of ≥2 endovascular therapies (EVTs) (HR, 3.11; 95%CI, 1.36–7.12; p = 0.007), and PACSS grade 3 or 4 (HR, 2.76; 95%CI, 1.15–6.63; p = 0.023). Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of the time from initial DCB to primary restenosis to prevent recurrent restenosis was 12.6 months, with an area under the curve of 0.841 (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Repeat DCB therapy for DCB restenosis might be an acceptable strategy, particularly for restenosis that occurred more than 12.6 months after initial DCB, given the rate of freedom from recurrent restenosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
期刊最新文献
Edoxaban Monotherapy and Incidence of Transcatheter Heart Valve Leaflet Thrombosis - The Rotterdam Edoxaban (REDOX) Study. Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of Post Myocardial Infarct Ventricular Septal Rupture After Surgical Patch Dehiscence. Acute Stent Thrombosis Following Reprotrusion of a Calcified Nodule in the Left Main Coronary Artery. Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve-In-Valve and Valve-In-Ring Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iatrogenic Aortocoronary Dissection During Coronary Intervention: A Case Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1