静脉注射利多卡因治疗胰腺导管腺癌和慢性胰腺炎患者的难治性疼痛:一项多中心前瞻性非随机试点研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000760
Simone Augustinus, Matthanja Bieze, Charlotte L Van Veldhuisen, Marja A Boermeester, Bert A Bonsing, Stefan A W Bouwense, Marco J Bruno, Olivier R Busch, Werner Ten Hoope, Jan-Willem Kallewaard, Henk J van Kranen, Marieke Niesters, Niels C J Schellekens, Monique A H Steegers, Rogier P Voermans, Judith de Vos-Geelen, Johanna W Wilmink, Jan H M Van Zundert, Casper H van Eijck, Marc G Besselink, Markus W Hollmann
{"title":"静脉注射利多卡因治疗胰腺导管腺癌和慢性胰腺炎患者的难治性疼痛:一项多中心前瞻性非随机试点研究。","authors":"Simone Augustinus, Matthanja Bieze, Charlotte L Van Veldhuisen, Marja A Boermeester, Bert A Bonsing, Stefan A W Bouwense, Marco J Bruno, Olivier R Busch, Werner Ten Hoope, Jan-Willem Kallewaard, Henk J van Kranen, Marieke Niesters, Niels C J Schellekens, Monique A H Steegers, Rogier P Voermans, Judith de Vos-Geelen, Johanna W Wilmink, Jan H M Van Zundert, Casper H van Eijck, Marc G Besselink, Markus W Hollmann","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Refractory pain is a major clinical problem in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and chronic pancreatitis (CP). New, effective therapies to reduce pain are urgently needed. Intravenous lidocaine is used in clinical practice in patients with PDAC and CP, but its efficacy has not been studied prospectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter prospective nonrandomized pilot study included patients with moderate or severe pain (Numeric Rating Scale ≥ 4) associated with PDAC or CP in 5 Dutch centers. An intravenous lidocaine bolus of 1.5 mg/kg was followed by continuous infusion at 1.5 mg/kg/hr. The dose was raised every 15 minutes until treatment response (up to a maximum 2 mg/kg/hr) and consecutively administered for 2 hours. Primary outcome was the mean difference in pain severity, preinfusion, and the first day after (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI] scale 1-10). A BPI decrease ≥1.3 points was considered clinically relevant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 30 patients were included, 19 with PDAC (63%) and 11 with CP (37%). The mean difference in BPI at day 1 was 1.1 (SD ± 1.3) points for patients with PDAC and 0.5 (SD ± 1.7) for patients with CP. A clinically relevant decrease in BPI on day 1 was reported in 9 of 29 patients (31%), and this response lasted up to 1 month. No serious complications were reported, and only 3 minor complications (vertigo, nausea, and tingling of mouth). Treatment with lidocaine did not impact quality of life.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Intravenous lidocaine in patients with painful PDAC and CP did not show an overall clinically relevant reduction of pain. However, this pilot study shows that the treatment is feasible in this patient group and had a positive effect in a third of patients which lasted up to a month with only minor side effects. To prove or exclude the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine, the study should be performed in a study with a greater sample size and less heterogeneous patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":"15 9","pages":"e1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11421722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous Lidocaine for Refractory Pain in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Chronic Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Prospective Nonrandomized Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Simone Augustinus, Matthanja Bieze, Charlotte L Van Veldhuisen, Marja A Boermeester, Bert A Bonsing, Stefan A W Bouwense, Marco J Bruno, Olivier R Busch, Werner Ten Hoope, Jan-Willem Kallewaard, Henk J van Kranen, Marieke Niesters, Niels C J Schellekens, Monique A H Steegers, Rogier P Voermans, Judith de Vos-Geelen, Johanna W Wilmink, Jan H M Van Zundert, Casper H van Eijck, Marc G Besselink, Markus W Hollmann\",\"doi\":\"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Refractory pain is a major clinical problem in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and chronic pancreatitis (CP). New, effective therapies to reduce pain are urgently needed. Intravenous lidocaine is used in clinical practice in patients with PDAC and CP, but its efficacy has not been studied prospectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter prospective nonrandomized pilot study included patients with moderate or severe pain (Numeric Rating Scale ≥ 4) associated with PDAC or CP in 5 Dutch centers. An intravenous lidocaine bolus of 1.5 mg/kg was followed by continuous infusion at 1.5 mg/kg/hr. The dose was raised every 15 minutes until treatment response (up to a maximum 2 mg/kg/hr) and consecutively administered for 2 hours. Primary outcome was the mean difference in pain severity, preinfusion, and the first day after (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI] scale 1-10). A BPI decrease ≥1.3 points was considered clinically relevant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 30 patients were included, 19 with PDAC (63%) and 11 with CP (37%). The mean difference in BPI at day 1 was 1.1 (SD ± 1.3) points for patients with PDAC and 0.5 (SD ± 1.7) for patients with CP. A clinically relevant decrease in BPI on day 1 was reported in 9 of 29 patients (31%), and this response lasted up to 1 month. No serious complications were reported, and only 3 minor complications (vertigo, nausea, and tingling of mouth). Treatment with lidocaine did not impact quality of life.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Intravenous lidocaine in patients with painful PDAC and CP did not show an overall clinically relevant reduction of pain. However, this pilot study shows that the treatment is feasible in this patient group and had a positive effect in a third of patients which lasted up to a month with only minor side effects. To prove or exclude the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine, the study should be performed in a study with a greater sample size and less heterogeneous patient group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"e1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11421722/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000760\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000760","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:难治性疼痛是胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)和慢性胰腺炎(CP)患者的主要临床问题。目前迫切需要新的、有效的止痛疗法。静脉注射利多卡因被用于 PDAC 和 CP 患者的临床实践,但尚未对其疗效进行前瞻性研究:多中心前瞻性非随机试验研究纳入了荷兰 5 个中心的中度或重度疼痛(数字评分量表≥ 4)的 PDAC 或 CP 患者。静脉注射利多卡因 1.5 毫克/千克,然后以 1.5 毫克/千克/小时的速度持续输注。剂量每15分钟增加一次,直至治疗反应(最大剂量为2毫克/千克/小时),连续输注2小时。主要结果是输液前和输液后第一天疼痛严重程度的平均差异(简明疼痛量表 [BPI] 评分 1-10)。BPI下降≥1.3分被认为与临床相关:共纳入 30 名患者,其中 PDAC 患者 19 名(占 63%),CP 患者 11 名(占 37%)。第 1 天,PDAC 患者的 BPI 平均值相差 1.1(标度±1.3)分,CP 患者的 BPI 平均值相差 0.5(标度±1.7)分。29 例患者中有 9 例(31%)在第 1 天出现了临床相关的 BPI 下降,这种反应持续了长达 1 个月。无严重并发症报告,仅有 3 例轻微并发症(眩晕、恶心和口腔刺痛)。利多卡因治疗不会影响患者的生活质量:讨论:静脉注射利多卡因治疗疼痛的 PDAC 和 CP 患者并未显示出临床相关的总体减痛效果。然而,这项试点研究表明,这种治疗方法在这一患者群体中是可行的,并对三分之一的患者产生了积极的影响,这种影响可持续一个月,且只有轻微的副作用。为了证明或排除静脉注射利多卡因的疗效,这项研究应在样本量更大、异质性更小的患者群体中进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intravenous Lidocaine for Refractory Pain in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Chronic Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Prospective Nonrandomized Pilot Study.

Introduction: Refractory pain is a major clinical problem in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and chronic pancreatitis (CP). New, effective therapies to reduce pain are urgently needed. Intravenous lidocaine is used in clinical practice in patients with PDAC and CP, but its efficacy has not been studied prospectively.

Methods: Multicenter prospective nonrandomized pilot study included patients with moderate or severe pain (Numeric Rating Scale ≥ 4) associated with PDAC or CP in 5 Dutch centers. An intravenous lidocaine bolus of 1.5 mg/kg was followed by continuous infusion at 1.5 mg/kg/hr. The dose was raised every 15 minutes until treatment response (up to a maximum 2 mg/kg/hr) and consecutively administered for 2 hours. Primary outcome was the mean difference in pain severity, preinfusion, and the first day after (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI] scale 1-10). A BPI decrease ≥1.3 points was considered clinically relevant.

Results: Overall, 30 patients were included, 19 with PDAC (63%) and 11 with CP (37%). The mean difference in BPI at day 1 was 1.1 (SD ± 1.3) points for patients with PDAC and 0.5 (SD ± 1.7) for patients with CP. A clinically relevant decrease in BPI on day 1 was reported in 9 of 29 patients (31%), and this response lasted up to 1 month. No serious complications were reported, and only 3 minor complications (vertigo, nausea, and tingling of mouth). Treatment with lidocaine did not impact quality of life.

Discussion: Intravenous lidocaine in patients with painful PDAC and CP did not show an overall clinically relevant reduction of pain. However, this pilot study shows that the treatment is feasible in this patient group and had a positive effect in a third of patients which lasted up to a month with only minor side effects. To prove or exclude the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine, the study should be performed in a study with a greater sample size and less heterogeneous patient group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (CTG), published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), is a peer-reviewed open access online journal dedicated to innovative clinical work in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. CTG hopes to fulfill an unmet need for clinicians and scientists by welcoming novel cohort studies, early-phase clinical trials, qualitative and quantitative epidemiologic research, hypothesis-generating research, studies of novel mechanisms and methodologies including public health interventions, and integration of approaches across organs and disciplines. CTG also welcomes hypothesis-generating small studies, methods papers, and translational research with clear applications to human physiology or disease. Colon and small bowel Endoscopy and novel diagnostics Esophagus Functional GI disorders Immunology of the GI tract Microbiology of the GI tract Inflammatory bowel disease Pancreas and biliary tract Liver Pathology Pediatrics Preventative medicine Nutrition/obesity Stomach.
期刊最新文献
Development of Time-Aggregated Machine Learning Model for Relapse Prediction in Pediatric Crohn's Disease. Diagnosing Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth. The Effects of Testosterone Replacement Therapy in Adult Men with Metabolic Dysfunction associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Size of Pelvic Outlet as a Potential Risk Factor for Fecal Incontinence: A Population-Based Exploratory Analysis. Association of Childhood Abuse with Incident Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1