Jieti Wang , Xiaolan Zhang , Ke Chen , Yun Liang , Yuan Liu , Ziting Jiang , Yiping He , Jie Chen , Jianqiang Liu
{"title":"小于 10 毫米的直肠神经内分泌肿瘤 R0 切除术的内窥镜治疗策略优化。","authors":"Jieti Wang , Xiaolan Zhang , Ke Chen , Yun Liang , Yuan Liu , Ziting Jiang , Yiping He , Jie Chen , Jianqiang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The optimal histologically complete (R0) resection methods of endoscopy for rectal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) ≤ 10 mm remains controversial. We aimed to assess the optimal endoscopic treatments for NETs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The retrospective enrolled patients (<em>n</em> = 208) with rectal NETs were divided into 3 subsets according to pathological tumor size: 2 - 3 mm, 4 - 5 mm, and 6 - 10 mm NETs. Factors associated with R0 resection according to different endoscopic treatments (accidental diagnostic biopsy by cold forceps, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)) and tumor size were investigated. All patients underwent follow-up and no local recurrence or metastasis were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 208 patients were enrolled. In patients with 2 - 3 mm NETs, the R0 resection rate was 100.0 % for biopsy, EMR, and ESD. The R0 resection rate for biopsy of 4 - 5 mm and 6 - 10 mm NETs was 34.3 % and 0.0 % respectively, which was inferior to the EMR/ESD rate (4 - 5mm: <em>p</em> < 0.001; 6 - 10 mm: <em>p</em> < 0.001: respectively). For patients with ≤ 10 mm NETs, EMR and ESD had a comparable en bloc (<em>p</em> = 0.082) and R0 resection rates (<em>p</em> = 0.651).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Accidental diagnostic biopsy by cold forceps could be considered as the possible treatment for 2 - 3 mm rectal NETs. And for patients with ≤ 10 mm rectal NETs, both EMR and ESD might be sufficient.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10424,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology","volume":"48 9","pages":"Article 102469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of endoscopic treatment strategies for R0 resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors smaller than 10 mm\",\"authors\":\"Jieti Wang , Xiaolan Zhang , Ke Chen , Yun Liang , Yuan Liu , Ziting Jiang , Yiping He , Jie Chen , Jianqiang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The optimal histologically complete (R0) resection methods of endoscopy for rectal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) ≤ 10 mm remains controversial. We aimed to assess the optimal endoscopic treatments for NETs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The retrospective enrolled patients (<em>n</em> = 208) with rectal NETs were divided into 3 subsets according to pathological tumor size: 2 - 3 mm, 4 - 5 mm, and 6 - 10 mm NETs. Factors associated with R0 resection according to different endoscopic treatments (accidental diagnostic biopsy by cold forceps, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)) and tumor size were investigated. All patients underwent follow-up and no local recurrence or metastasis were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 208 patients were enrolled. In patients with 2 - 3 mm NETs, the R0 resection rate was 100.0 % for biopsy, EMR, and ESD. The R0 resection rate for biopsy of 4 - 5 mm and 6 - 10 mm NETs was 34.3 % and 0.0 % respectively, which was inferior to the EMR/ESD rate (4 - 5mm: <em>p</em> < 0.001; 6 - 10 mm: <em>p</em> < 0.001: respectively). For patients with ≤ 10 mm NETs, EMR and ESD had a comparable en bloc (<em>p</em> = 0.082) and R0 resection rates (<em>p</em> = 0.651).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Accidental diagnostic biopsy by cold forceps could be considered as the possible treatment for 2 - 3 mm rectal NETs. And for patients with ≤ 10 mm rectal NETs, both EMR and ESD might be sufficient.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"48 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 102469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210740124001906\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210740124001906","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimization of endoscopic treatment strategies for R0 resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors smaller than 10 mm
Background
The optimal histologically complete (R0) resection methods of endoscopy for rectal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) ≤ 10 mm remains controversial. We aimed to assess the optimal endoscopic treatments for NETs.
Methods
The retrospective enrolled patients (n = 208) with rectal NETs were divided into 3 subsets according to pathological tumor size: 2 - 3 mm, 4 - 5 mm, and 6 - 10 mm NETs. Factors associated with R0 resection according to different endoscopic treatments (accidental diagnostic biopsy by cold forceps, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)) and tumor size were investigated. All patients underwent follow-up and no local recurrence or metastasis were identified.
Results
A total of 208 patients were enrolled. In patients with 2 - 3 mm NETs, the R0 resection rate was 100.0 % for biopsy, EMR, and ESD. The R0 resection rate for biopsy of 4 - 5 mm and 6 - 10 mm NETs was 34.3 % and 0.0 % respectively, which was inferior to the EMR/ESD rate (4 - 5mm: p < 0.001; 6 - 10 mm: p < 0.001: respectively). For patients with ≤ 10 mm NETs, EMR and ESD had a comparable en bloc (p = 0.082) and R0 resection rates (p = 0.651).
Conclusion
Accidental diagnostic biopsy by cold forceps could be considered as the possible treatment for 2 - 3 mm rectal NETs. And for patients with ≤ 10 mm rectal NETs, both EMR and ESD might be sufficient.
期刊介绍:
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology publishes high-quality original research papers in the field of hepatology and gastroenterology. The editors put the accent on rapid communication of new research and clinical developments and so called "hot topic" issues. Following a clear Editorial line, besides original articles and case reports, each issue features editorials, commentaries and reviews. The journal encourages research and discussion between all those involved in the specialty on an international level. All articles are peer reviewed by international experts, the articles in press are online and indexed in the international databases (Current Contents, Pubmed, Scopus, Science Direct).
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology is a subscription journal (with optional open access), which allows you to publish your research without any cost to you (unless you proactively chose the open access option). Your article will be available to all researchers around the globe whose institution has a subscription to the journal.