入院后射血分数严重降低的心衰患者的临床经济负担:HF-RESTORE。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae081
Heidi T May, Jeffrey L Anderson, Michael Butzner, Punag H Divanji, Joseph B Muhlestein
{"title":"入院后射血分数严重降低的心衰患者的临床经济负担:HF-RESTORE。","authors":"Heidi T May, Jeffrey L Anderson, Michael Butzner, Punag H Divanji, Joseph B Muhlestein","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An estimated two-thirds of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) hospitalized in the United States have a severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <30%). Few studies have categorized patients according to their severity of left ventricular dysfunction beyond an LVEF of <30%.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Intermountain Health patients (≥18 years) with a primary HF diagnosis, more than or equal to 1 inpatient hospitalization with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF, a documented LVEF of <30%, and a B-type natriuretic peptide >100 pg/mL within 1 year of hospitalization were studied. Patients were stratified by LVEF levels (≤15%, 16-25%, and 26-29%) and evaluated for death, HF hospitalization, healthcare resource utilization, and medical costs. Overall, 2184 patients (mean age 64.2 ± 15.5 years, 72.5% male) were stratified by LVEF [≤15%, n = 468 (21.4%); 16-25%, n = 1399 (64.1%); and 26-29%, n = 317 (14.5%)]. Lower LVEF was associated with younger age, male sex, and fewer comorbidities. Although 1-year mortality differed significantly between LVEF stratifications, which remained after adjustment by risk factors [vs. LVEF 26-29% (referent): ≤15%, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.92, P < 0.0001; and 16-25%, HR = 1.42, P = 0.01], mortality was similar by 3 years. HF hospitalizations at 1 and 3 years were similar among LVEF groups. Total HF costs-driven by increased HF outpatient costs-were significantly higher among LVEF of ≤15%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with an LVEF of ≤15% had a modestly increased risk of 1-year mortality, as well as significantly higher total HF costs. Patients with HFrEF and a severely reduced LVEF continue to face an increased clinicoeconomic burden, and novel therapies to treat this unmet medical need are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"149-159"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicoeconomic burden among heart failure patients with severely reduced ejection fraction after hospital admission: HF-RESTORE.\",\"authors\":\"Heidi T May, Jeffrey L Anderson, Michael Butzner, Punag H Divanji, Joseph B Muhlestein\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An estimated two-thirds of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) hospitalized in the United States have a severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <30%). Few studies have categorized patients according to their severity of left ventricular dysfunction beyond an LVEF of <30%.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Intermountain Health patients (≥18 years) with a primary HF diagnosis, more than or equal to 1 inpatient hospitalization with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF, a documented LVEF of <30%, and a B-type natriuretic peptide >100 pg/mL within 1 year of hospitalization were studied. Patients were stratified by LVEF levels (≤15%, 16-25%, and 26-29%) and evaluated for death, HF hospitalization, healthcare resource utilization, and medical costs. Overall, 2184 patients (mean age 64.2 ± 15.5 years, 72.5% male) were stratified by LVEF [≤15%, n = 468 (21.4%); 16-25%, n = 1399 (64.1%); and 26-29%, n = 317 (14.5%)]. Lower LVEF was associated with younger age, male sex, and fewer comorbidities. Although 1-year mortality differed significantly between LVEF stratifications, which remained after adjustment by risk factors [vs. LVEF 26-29% (referent): ≤15%, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.92, P < 0.0001; and 16-25%, HR = 1.42, P = 0.01], mortality was similar by 3 years. HF hospitalizations at 1 and 3 years were similar among LVEF groups. Total HF costs-driven by increased HF outpatient costs-were significantly higher among LVEF of ≤15%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with an LVEF of ≤15% had a modestly increased risk of 1-year mortality, as well as significantly higher total HF costs. Patients with HFrEF and a severely reduced LVEF continue to face an increased clinicoeconomic burden, and novel therapies to treat this unmet medical need are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"149-159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae081\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据估计,美国三分之二的射血分数降低型心力衰竭(HF)住院患者的左心室射血分数(LVEF)严重降低:研究对象为 Intermountain Health 的患者(≥18 岁),主要诊断为心力衰竭,住院≥1 次且主要出院诊断为心力衰竭,住院一年内记录的 LVEF 为 100 pg/mL。根据 LVEF 水平(≤15%、16-25% 和 26-29%)对患者进行分层,并对死亡、HF 住院、医疗资源使用和医疗费用进行评估:共有 2 184 名患者(平均年龄为 64.2 ± 15.5 岁,72.5% 为男性)按 LVEF 分层(≤15%,468 人 [21.4%];16-25%,1399 人 [64.1%];26-29%,317 人 [14.5%])。LVEF 较低与年龄较小、男性和较少合并症有关。虽然 LVEF 分级之间的一年死亡率存在显著差异,但在根据风险因素进行调整后,这一差异依然存在(与 LVEF 26-29% [参考值]相比):≤15%,危险比 (HR)=1.92, p 结论:LVEF ≤ 15% 的患者死亡率较低,而 LVEF 26-29% [参考值]的患者死亡率较高:LVEF≤15%的患者1年死亡风险略有增加,HF总费用也显著增加。HFrEF 和 LVEF 严重减低的患者继续面临着更大的临床经济负担,因此需要新型疗法来治疗这一尚未满足的医疗需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinicoeconomic burden among heart failure patients with severely reduced ejection fraction after hospital admission: HF-RESTORE.

Background: An estimated two-thirds of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) hospitalized in the United States have a severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <30%). Few studies have categorized patients according to their severity of left ventricular dysfunction beyond an LVEF of <30%.

Methods and results: Intermountain Health patients (≥18 years) with a primary HF diagnosis, more than or equal to 1 inpatient hospitalization with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF, a documented LVEF of <30%, and a B-type natriuretic peptide >100 pg/mL within 1 year of hospitalization were studied. Patients were stratified by LVEF levels (≤15%, 16-25%, and 26-29%) and evaluated for death, HF hospitalization, healthcare resource utilization, and medical costs. Overall, 2184 patients (mean age 64.2 ± 15.5 years, 72.5% male) were stratified by LVEF [≤15%, n = 468 (21.4%); 16-25%, n = 1399 (64.1%); and 26-29%, n = 317 (14.5%)]. Lower LVEF was associated with younger age, male sex, and fewer comorbidities. Although 1-year mortality differed significantly between LVEF stratifications, which remained after adjustment by risk factors [vs. LVEF 26-29% (referent): ≤15%, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.92, P < 0.0001; and 16-25%, HR = 1.42, P = 0.01], mortality was similar by 3 years. HF hospitalizations at 1 and 3 years were similar among LVEF groups. Total HF costs-driven by increased HF outpatient costs-were significantly higher among LVEF of ≤15%.

Conclusion: Patients with an LVEF of ≤15% had a modestly increased risk of 1-year mortality, as well as significantly higher total HF costs. Patients with HFrEF and a severely reduced LVEF continue to face an increased clinicoeconomic burden, and novel therapies to treat this unmet medical need are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
期刊最新文献
Should we routinely measure patient quality of life after acute coronary syndrome? Heart failure clinical registries vs. registering the reality of heart failure. Five-year outcomes following catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a propensity matched analysis of 51 182 patients from a real world cohort. Low-dose aspirin and risk of anaemia in older adults: insights from a Danish register-based cohort study. Quality of life effects of renal artery stenting versus medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis: results from the randomized CORAL trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1