耳硬化症患者的人工耳蜗植入术:骨化和非骨化耳蜗的手术和听力效果。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1007/s00405-024-08970-w
Mohammed Al-Khateeb, Francesco Di Pierro, Gianluca Piras, Lorenzo Lauda, Mohanad Almashhadani, Sachin K Damam, Mario Sanna
{"title":"耳硬化症患者的人工耳蜗植入术:骨化和非骨化耳蜗的手术和听力效果。","authors":"Mohammed Al-Khateeb, Francesco Di Pierro, Gianluca Piras, Lorenzo Lauda, Mohanad Almashhadani, Sachin K Damam, Mario Sanna","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08970-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate (1) Audiological and surgical outcomes in patients with otosclerosis following cochlear implantation. (2) surgical difficulties and outcomes between both groups. (3) Audiological outcomes between both groups.</p><p><strong>Study design and setting: </strong>Retrospective study conducted at Otology and Skull Base Surgery Center.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Data were analyzed from 111 patients with otosclerosis (114 ears) who underwent cochlear implant surgery using the cochlear implant database. Demographic characteristics (age, sex, and operated ear), auditory outcomes, and operative details (extent of cochlear ossification, surgical approach [posterior tympanotomy or subtotal petrosectomy], electrode insertion [partial/complete, scala tympani or vestibuli], and complications) were analyzed Auditory outcomes were assessed over at least one year follow-up period using pure tone audiometry and speech discrimination scores. Patients were divided into two groups (with and without cochlear ossification) to compare auditory outcomes and surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients with ossified and non-ossified cochlea was 60.04 and 62.22 years respectively. Sixty-five of 114 ears had cochlear ossification, with complete round window involvement in 75.4% of these patients, while the rest had partial or complete basal turn ossification. Subtotal petrosectomy was performed in 63.1% and 28.6% of ossified and non-ossified cochlea respectively while the rest underwent cochlear implantation through posterior tympanotomy. Only one case had scala vestibuli insertion and four had incomplete electrode insertion. Six patients underwent re-implantation due to infection, device failure, and erosion of the posterior canal wall. Auditory outcomes among patients with ossified otosclerosis were slightly better than those without ossification but this difference was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cochlear implantation for otosclerosis yields excellent auditory outcomes with a low rate of surgical complications, despite the high incidence of cochlear ossification.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"723-730"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cochlear implantation in otosclerosis: surgical and audiological outcomes between ossified and non-ossified cochlea.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Al-Khateeb, Francesco Di Pierro, Gianluca Piras, Lorenzo Lauda, Mohanad Almashhadani, Sachin K Damam, Mario Sanna\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-024-08970-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate (1) Audiological and surgical outcomes in patients with otosclerosis following cochlear implantation. (2) surgical difficulties and outcomes between both groups. (3) Audiological outcomes between both groups.</p><p><strong>Study design and setting: </strong>Retrospective study conducted at Otology and Skull Base Surgery Center.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Data were analyzed from 111 patients with otosclerosis (114 ears) who underwent cochlear implant surgery using the cochlear implant database. Demographic characteristics (age, sex, and operated ear), auditory outcomes, and operative details (extent of cochlear ossification, surgical approach [posterior tympanotomy or subtotal petrosectomy], electrode insertion [partial/complete, scala tympani or vestibuli], and complications) were analyzed Auditory outcomes were assessed over at least one year follow-up period using pure tone audiometry and speech discrimination scores. Patients were divided into two groups (with and without cochlear ossification) to compare auditory outcomes and surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients with ossified and non-ossified cochlea was 60.04 and 62.22 years respectively. Sixty-five of 114 ears had cochlear ossification, with complete round window involvement in 75.4% of these patients, while the rest had partial or complete basal turn ossification. Subtotal petrosectomy was performed in 63.1% and 28.6% of ossified and non-ossified cochlea respectively while the rest underwent cochlear implantation through posterior tympanotomy. Only one case had scala vestibuli insertion and four had incomplete electrode insertion. Six patients underwent re-implantation due to infection, device failure, and erosion of the posterior canal wall. Auditory outcomes among patients with ossified otosclerosis were slightly better than those without ossification but this difference was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cochlear implantation for otosclerosis yields excellent auditory outcomes with a low rate of surgical complications, despite the high incidence of cochlear ossification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"723-730\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08970-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08970-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估 (1) 人工耳蜗植入术后耳硬化症患者的听力和手术效果。(2) 两组患者的手术难度和效果。(3) 两组患者的听力结果:研究对象和方法:在耳科和颅底外科中心进行的回顾性研究:利用人工耳蜗植入数据库分析了111名接受人工耳蜗植入手术的耳硬化症患者(114耳)的数据。分析了人口统计学特征(年龄、性别和手术耳)、听力结果和手术细节(耳蜗骨化程度、手术方法[后鼓室切开术或次全鼓室切开术]、电极插入[部分/完全、鼓室或前庭]和并发症),并使用纯音测听和言语辨别力评分评估了至少一年随访期的听力结果。患者被分为两组(有耳蜗骨化和无耳蜗骨化),以比较听力结果和手术结果:耳蜗骨化和非骨化患者的平均年龄分别为 60.04 岁和 62.22 岁。114 耳中有 65 耳耳蜗骨化,其中 75.4% 的患者完全受累于圆窗,其余患者则部分或完全受累于基底转骨化。63.1%和28.6%的骨化和非骨化耳蜗分别进行了次全瓣切除术,其余患者则通过后鼓室切开术进行了人工耳蜗植入术。只有一例植入了前庭,四例电极植入不完全。六名患者因感染、设备故障和后耳道壁侵蚀而接受了再次植入手术。骨化性耳硬化症患者的听力效果略好于无骨化性患者,但差异无统计学意义:结论:尽管人工耳蜗骨化的发生率较高,但人工耳蜗植入术治疗耳硬化症的听力效果极佳,手术并发症发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cochlear implantation in otosclerosis: surgical and audiological outcomes between ossified and non-ossified cochlea.

Aim: To evaluate (1) Audiological and surgical outcomes in patients with otosclerosis following cochlear implantation. (2) surgical difficulties and outcomes between both groups. (3) Audiological outcomes between both groups.

Study design and setting: Retrospective study conducted at Otology and Skull Base Surgery Center.

Subjects and methods: Data were analyzed from 111 patients with otosclerosis (114 ears) who underwent cochlear implant surgery using the cochlear implant database. Demographic characteristics (age, sex, and operated ear), auditory outcomes, and operative details (extent of cochlear ossification, surgical approach [posterior tympanotomy or subtotal petrosectomy], electrode insertion [partial/complete, scala tympani or vestibuli], and complications) were analyzed Auditory outcomes were assessed over at least one year follow-up period using pure tone audiometry and speech discrimination scores. Patients were divided into two groups (with and without cochlear ossification) to compare auditory outcomes and surgical outcomes.

Results: The mean age of patients with ossified and non-ossified cochlea was 60.04 and 62.22 years respectively. Sixty-five of 114 ears had cochlear ossification, with complete round window involvement in 75.4% of these patients, while the rest had partial or complete basal turn ossification. Subtotal petrosectomy was performed in 63.1% and 28.6% of ossified and non-ossified cochlea respectively while the rest underwent cochlear implantation through posterior tympanotomy. Only one case had scala vestibuli insertion and four had incomplete electrode insertion. Six patients underwent re-implantation due to infection, device failure, and erosion of the posterior canal wall. Auditory outcomes among patients with ossified otosclerosis were slightly better than those without ossification but this difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Cochlear implantation for otosclerosis yields excellent auditory outcomes with a low rate of surgical complications, despite the high incidence of cochlear ossification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
期刊最新文献
Democratizing cancer detection: artificial intelligence-enhanced endoscopy could address global disparities in head and neck cancer outcomes. Faster recovery in patients with facial nerve palsy treated with contralateral botulinum toxin injection: a case-control study. Intratympanic steroid as salvage therapy for sudden sensorineural hearing loss: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Survival analysis of laryngeal squamous cell cancer, considering different treatment modalities and other factors influencing survival - a monocentric retrospective investigation. The SAPIENS 3D-printed temporal bone model: a real tool for advanced otologic surgery education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1