独家内窥镜鼓室成形术在治疗无乳突受累的胆脂瘤方面的疗效。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1007/s00405-024-08778-8
Luca Bianconi, Stefano Meneghesso, Valerio Arietti, Giacomo Leonardi, Daniele Monzani, Luca Sacchetto
{"title":"独家内窥镜鼓室成形术在治疗无乳突受累的胆脂瘤方面的疗效。","authors":"Luca Bianconi, Stefano Meneghesso, Valerio Arietti, Giacomo Leonardi, Daniele Monzani, Luca Sacchetto","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08778-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to determine the recurrence rate of cholesteatoma in patients who have undergone exclusive endoscopic tympanoplasty at our tertiary referral institution. A secondary objective is to analyze different clinical aspects that could be considered risk factors for recurrence to establish if it is possible to determine when a second-look procedure is indicated instead of a clinical follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed on patients who had undergone exclusive endoscopic tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma in the last eight years and who were followed up for at least one year. The efficacy of the treatment performed only with the exclusive endoscopic technique was analyzed. Then, the anamnestic and intraoperative data were studied to identify possible factors that could increase the risk of recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recurrence rate (14.5%) in patients (164) who underwent primary surgery with the exclusive endoscopic technique between January 2014 and January 2022 was similar to that in patients who underwent the microscopic technique with mastoidectomy in literature. In addition, we analyzed several clinical factors such as age, ossicular chain erosion, extension and localization of the cholesteatoma finding that only the last one could potentially be a risk factor for recurrence in this selected population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exclusive endoscopic tympanoplasty has been shown to be effective in removing cholesteatoma in patients without evidence of mastoid involvement, with recurrence rates comparable to traditional microscopic technique and a minimally invasive approach, even considering the patient's age, ossicular chain erosion and extension of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exclusive endoscopic tympanoplasty efficacy in the treatment of cholesteatoma without mastoid involvement.\",\"authors\":\"Luca Bianconi, Stefano Meneghesso, Valerio Arietti, Giacomo Leonardi, Daniele Monzani, Luca Sacchetto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-024-08778-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to determine the recurrence rate of cholesteatoma in patients who have undergone exclusive endoscopic tympanoplasty at our tertiary referral institution. A secondary objective is to analyze different clinical aspects that could be considered risk factors for recurrence to establish if it is possible to determine when a second-look procedure is indicated instead of a clinical follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed on patients who had undergone exclusive endoscopic tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma in the last eight years and who were followed up for at least one year. The efficacy of the treatment performed only with the exclusive endoscopic technique was analyzed. Then, the anamnestic and intraoperative data were studied to identify possible factors that could increase the risk of recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recurrence rate (14.5%) in patients (164) who underwent primary surgery with the exclusive endoscopic technique between January 2014 and January 2022 was similar to that in patients who underwent the microscopic technique with mastoidectomy in literature. In addition, we analyzed several clinical factors such as age, ossicular chain erosion, extension and localization of the cholesteatoma finding that only the last one could potentially be a risk factor for recurrence in this selected population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exclusive endoscopic tympanoplasty has been shown to be effective in removing cholesteatoma in patients without evidence of mastoid involvement, with recurrence rates comparable to traditional microscopic technique and a minimally invasive approach, even considering the patient's age, ossicular chain erosion and extension of the disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512923/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08778-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08778-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是确定在我们的三级转诊机构接受过独家内窥镜鼓室成形术的患者的胆脂瘤复发率。次要目的是分析可被视为复发风险因素的不同临床方面,以确定是否有可能确定何时应进行二次手术而不是临床随访:方法:对过去八年中接受过内窥镜鼓室成形术治疗胆脂瘤并随访至少一年的患者进行了一项回顾性研究。研究分析了仅采用独家内窥镜技术进行治疗的疗效。然后,研究了肛门和术中数据,以确定可能增加复发风险的因素:结果:在2014年1月至2022年1月期间,接受独家内窥镜技术初次手术的患者(164人)的复发率(14.5%)与文献中接受乳突切除术的显微镜技术患者的复发率(14.5%)相似。此外,我们还分析了几项临床因素,如年龄、听骨链侵蚀、胆脂瘤的扩展和定位,发现只有最后一项可能是这部分人群复发的潜在风险因素:结论:即使考虑到患者的年龄、听骨链侵蚀程度和疾病的扩展程度,内窥镜鼓室成形术在切除无乳突受累证据的患者的胆脂瘤方面效果显著,其复发率与传统的显微技术和微创方法相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exclusive endoscopic tympanoplasty efficacy in the treatment of cholesteatoma without mastoid involvement.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the recurrence rate of cholesteatoma in patients who have undergone exclusive endoscopic tympanoplasty at our tertiary referral institution. A secondary objective is to analyze different clinical aspects that could be considered risk factors for recurrence to establish if it is possible to determine when a second-look procedure is indicated instead of a clinical follow-up.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed on patients who had undergone exclusive endoscopic tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma in the last eight years and who were followed up for at least one year. The efficacy of the treatment performed only with the exclusive endoscopic technique was analyzed. Then, the anamnestic and intraoperative data were studied to identify possible factors that could increase the risk of recurrence.

Results: The recurrence rate (14.5%) in patients (164) who underwent primary surgery with the exclusive endoscopic technique between January 2014 and January 2022 was similar to that in patients who underwent the microscopic technique with mastoidectomy in literature. In addition, we analyzed several clinical factors such as age, ossicular chain erosion, extension and localization of the cholesteatoma finding that only the last one could potentially be a risk factor for recurrence in this selected population.

Conclusion: Exclusive endoscopic tympanoplasty has been shown to be effective in removing cholesteatoma in patients without evidence of mastoid involvement, with recurrence rates comparable to traditional microscopic technique and a minimally invasive approach, even considering the patient's age, ossicular chain erosion and extension of the disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
期刊最新文献
Correction: A novel olfactory sorting task. Scale for the assessment of mucosal wave dynamics of the free edges during stroboscopic examination: clinical validation study and analysis of results. Drug induced sleep endoscopy and simultaneous polysomnography to predict the effectiveness of mandibular advancement device in obstructive sleep apnea treatment. Endoscopic revision surgery for ossicular chain reconstruction: intraoperative findings and functional outcomes. AI in oncology: comparing the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of claude 3 opus and ChatGPT 4.0 in HNSCC management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1