在考虑法医案件工作中的活动时,估算玻璃背景存在的概率项。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL Forensic science international Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112221
James M. Curran , Patrick Buzzini , Tatiana Trejos
{"title":"在考虑法医案件工作中的活动时,估算玻璃背景存在的概率项。","authors":"James M. Curran ,&nbsp;Patrick Buzzini ,&nbsp;Tatiana Trejos","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coulson et al. [1] proposed methodology for the estimation of the <em>P</em> and <em>S</em> terms used in glass interpretation when assessing the value of the findings given activity level propositions. These terms arise in a model proposed by Evett [2], Evett and Buckleton [3], and are based on survey data. Specifically they proposed a model for estimating <em>P</em><sub><em>k</em></sub>, <em>k</em> = 0, 1, 2, … and <em>S</em><sub><em>n</em></sub>, <em>n</em> = 1, 2, where <em>P</em><sub><em>k</em></sub> is the probability of finding <em>k</em> distinct sources (or groups) of glass on a person of interest (POI), and <em>S</em><sub><em>n</em></sub> is the probability that the <em>k</em>th source consists of <em>n</em> fragments. In this article we make a number of extensions to the work of Coulson et al. [1]. Firstly we derive an estimate of the uncertainty in the parameter of the Coulson et al. model, and show how this may be used—for example, to compute an estimate of how the probabilities may vary or how to compare estimates resulting from different surveys. Secondly, we extend the model by allowing a more sensible modelling of the “excess” zeros (in the case of the <em>P</em> terms) and excess ones (in the case of the <em>S</em> terms). The methodology used to make these extensions relies on purely frequentist theory of estimation in keeping with the original work. A Bayesian approach to estimation will be the subject of future work. Additionally, we demonstrate the use of an R (R Core Team, [4]) package, called fitPS (Curran, [5]) which makes the methodology described in this article easy to implement in practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":"364 ","pages":"Article 112221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating probability terms for the background presence of glass when considering activity in forensic casework\",\"authors\":\"James M. Curran ,&nbsp;Patrick Buzzini ,&nbsp;Tatiana Trejos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Coulson et al. [1] proposed methodology for the estimation of the <em>P</em> and <em>S</em> terms used in glass interpretation when assessing the value of the findings given activity level propositions. These terms arise in a model proposed by Evett [2], Evett and Buckleton [3], and are based on survey data. Specifically they proposed a model for estimating <em>P</em><sub><em>k</em></sub>, <em>k</em> = 0, 1, 2, … and <em>S</em><sub><em>n</em></sub>, <em>n</em> = 1, 2, where <em>P</em><sub><em>k</em></sub> is the probability of finding <em>k</em> distinct sources (or groups) of glass on a person of interest (POI), and <em>S</em><sub><em>n</em></sub> is the probability that the <em>k</em>th source consists of <em>n</em> fragments. In this article we make a number of extensions to the work of Coulson et al. [1]. Firstly we derive an estimate of the uncertainty in the parameter of the Coulson et al. model, and show how this may be used—for example, to compute an estimate of how the probabilities may vary or how to compare estimates resulting from different surveys. Secondly, we extend the model by allowing a more sensible modelling of the “excess” zeros (in the case of the <em>P</em> terms) and excess ones (in the case of the <em>S</em> terms). The methodology used to make these extensions relies on purely frequentist theory of estimation in keeping with the original work. A Bayesian approach to estimation will be the subject of future work. Additionally, we demonstrate the use of an R (R Core Team, [4]) package, called fitPS (Curran, [5]) which makes the methodology described in this article easy to implement in practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic science international\",\"volume\":\"364 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic science international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073824003025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073824003025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Coulson 等人[1]提出了一种方法,用于在给定活动水平命题的情况下评估调查结果的价值时,估算玻璃解释中使用的 P 和 S 项。这些术语产生于 Evett [2]、Evett 和 Buckleton [3]根据调查数据提出的模型中。具体来说,他们提出了一个用于估算 Pk(k = 0, 1, 2, ...)和 Sn(n = 1, 2)的模型,其中 Pk 是在感兴趣的人(POI)身上发现 k 个不同玻璃源(或玻璃组)的概率,Sn 是第 k 个玻璃源由 n 个碎片组成的概率。在本文中,我们对库尔森等人[1]的工作进行了一些扩展。首先,我们得出了 Coulson 等人模型参数不确定性的估计值,并展示了如何使用该估计值--例如,计算概率变化的估计值,或如何比较不同调查得出的估计值。其次,我们对模型进行了扩展,允许对 "多余 "的零(在 P 项的情况下)和多余的一(在 S 项的情况下)进行更合理的建模。进行这些扩展所使用的方法依赖于纯粹的频繁主义估计理论,与原作保持一致。贝叶斯估计方法将是未来工作的主题。此外,我们还演示了一个名为 fitPS(Curran,[5])的 R(R Core Team,[4])软件包的使用方法,它使得本文所述的方法在实践中很容易实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating probability terms for the background presence of glass when considering activity in forensic casework
Coulson et al. [1] proposed methodology for the estimation of the P and S terms used in glass interpretation when assessing the value of the findings given activity level propositions. These terms arise in a model proposed by Evett [2], Evett and Buckleton [3], and are based on survey data. Specifically they proposed a model for estimating Pkk = 0, 1, 2, … and Snn = 1, 2, where Pk is the probability of finding k distinct sources (or groups) of glass on a person of interest (POI), and Sn is the probability that the kth source consists of n fragments. In this article we make a number of extensions to the work of Coulson et al. [1]. Firstly we derive an estimate of the uncertainty in the parameter of the Coulson et al. model, and show how this may be used—for example, to compute an estimate of how the probabilities may vary or how to compare estimates resulting from different surveys. Secondly, we extend the model by allowing a more sensible modelling of the “excess” zeros (in the case of the P terms) and excess ones (in the case of the S terms). The methodology used to make these extensions relies on purely frequentist theory of estimation in keeping with the original work. A Bayesian approach to estimation will be the subject of future work. Additionally, we demonstrate the use of an R (R Core Team, [4]) package, called fitPS (Curran, [5]) which makes the methodology described in this article easy to implement in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic science international
Forensic science international 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law. The journal publishes: Case Reports Commentaries Letters to the Editor Original Research Papers (Regular Papers) Rapid Communications Review Articles Technical Notes.
期刊最新文献
A retrospective review of the circumstances and characteristics of 72 adult autoerotic neck compression deaths in Australia, between 2000 and 2022. Indoor domestic canine scavenging: A literature review. Microchimerism: The mystery of multiple DNA and its implications in forensic sciences. Taking care of women living with female genital mutilation or cutting: Characteristics of the pool of users of two healthcare facilities in Turin, Northern Italy. Physical injury in men after sexual assault: An analysis of 137 cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1