[心律失常性心肌病的诊断:20 年的进步与创新]。

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Giornale italiano di cardiologia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1714/4336.43216
Domenico Corrado, Alessandro Zorzi, Barbara Bauce, Ilaria Rigato, Alberto Cipriani, Martina Perazzolo Marra, Kalliopi Pilichou, Cristina Basso, Simone Ungaro, Francesca Graziano
{"title":"[心律失常性心肌病的诊断:20 年的进步与创新]。","authors":"Domenico Corrado, Alessandro Zorzi, Barbara Bauce, Ilaria Rigato, Alberto Cipriani, Martina Perazzolo Marra, Kalliopi Pilichou, Cristina Basso, Simone Ungaro, Francesca Graziano","doi":"10.1714/4336.43216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (CMA) is a cardiac disease characterized by non-ischemic ventricular scarring and electrical instability. The diagnosis of CMA still remains challenging today and requires the use of a set of criteria, since no single diagnostic test represents the gold standard. The first diagnostic criteria were defined and disseminated in 1994 and then revised in 2010, focusing mainly on right ventricular involvement. In 2019, an international panel of experts identified the limitations of the previous diagnostic criteria. The 2020 Padua criteria included a specific pathway for the diagnosis of left ventricular variants and emphasized the need for the use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of myocardial scarring. These criteria were further refined and published in 2023 as European Task Force (TF) criteria, thus gaining international recognition.Exploring the history of CMA and its diagnosis, in this review we analyze the changes and progress in the 20 years that have occurred from the first version of the criteria in 1994 to the latest in European TF of 2023, highlighting the evolution of our knowledge of the pathobiology and morpho-functional characteristics of the disease. One of the most relevant updates is undoubtedly the introduction of the concept of \"scarring/arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy\", a definition that enhances the main features of the pathology and emphasizes the multiplicity of phenotypes and clinical presentations independent of etiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":12510,"journal":{"name":"Giornale italiano di cardiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: 20 years of progress and innovation].\",\"authors\":\"Domenico Corrado, Alessandro Zorzi, Barbara Bauce, Ilaria Rigato, Alberto Cipriani, Martina Perazzolo Marra, Kalliopi Pilichou, Cristina Basso, Simone Ungaro, Francesca Graziano\",\"doi\":\"10.1714/4336.43216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (CMA) is a cardiac disease characterized by non-ischemic ventricular scarring and electrical instability. The diagnosis of CMA still remains challenging today and requires the use of a set of criteria, since no single diagnostic test represents the gold standard. The first diagnostic criteria were defined and disseminated in 1994 and then revised in 2010, focusing mainly on right ventricular involvement. In 2019, an international panel of experts identified the limitations of the previous diagnostic criteria. The 2020 Padua criteria included a specific pathway for the diagnosis of left ventricular variants and emphasized the need for the use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of myocardial scarring. These criteria were further refined and published in 2023 as European Task Force (TF) criteria, thus gaining international recognition.Exploring the history of CMA and its diagnosis, in this review we analyze the changes and progress in the 20 years that have occurred from the first version of the criteria in 1994 to the latest in European TF of 2023, highlighting the evolution of our knowledge of the pathobiology and morpho-functional characteristics of the disease. One of the most relevant updates is undoubtedly the introduction of the concept of \\\"scarring/arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy\\\", a definition that enhances the main features of the pathology and emphasizes the multiplicity of phenotypes and clinical presentations independent of etiology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Giornale italiano di cardiologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Giornale italiano di cardiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1714/4336.43216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale italiano di cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1714/4336.43216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心律失常性心肌病(CMA)是一种以非缺血性心室瘢痕和心电不稳定为特征的心脏病。时至今日,CMA 的诊断仍然具有挑战性,需要使用一套标准,因为没有一种诊断测试能代表金标准。第一个诊断标准于 1994 年确定并发布,随后于 2010 年进行了修订,主要侧重于右心室受累。2019 年,一个国际专家小组确定了之前诊断标准的局限性。2020 年的帕多瓦标准包括了诊断左心室变异的具体途径,并强调了使用心脏磁共振成像确定心肌瘢痕特征的必要性。本综述探讨了 CMA 及其诊断的历史,分析了从 1994 年第一版标准到 2023 年最新的欧洲 TF 标准这 20 年间的变化和进展,强调了我们对该疾病的病理生物学和形态功能特征的认识的演变。其中最有意义的更新无疑是引入了 "瘢痕/心律失常性心肌病 "的概念,这一定义增强了病理的主要特征,强调了表型和临床表现的多样性,与病因无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: 20 years of progress and innovation].

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (CMA) is a cardiac disease characterized by non-ischemic ventricular scarring and electrical instability. The diagnosis of CMA still remains challenging today and requires the use of a set of criteria, since no single diagnostic test represents the gold standard. The first diagnostic criteria were defined and disseminated in 1994 and then revised in 2010, focusing mainly on right ventricular involvement. In 2019, an international panel of experts identified the limitations of the previous diagnostic criteria. The 2020 Padua criteria included a specific pathway for the diagnosis of left ventricular variants and emphasized the need for the use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of myocardial scarring. These criteria were further refined and published in 2023 as European Task Force (TF) criteria, thus gaining international recognition.Exploring the history of CMA and its diagnosis, in this review we analyze the changes and progress in the 20 years that have occurred from the first version of the criteria in 1994 to the latest in European TF of 2023, highlighting the evolution of our knowledge of the pathobiology and morpho-functional characteristics of the disease. One of the most relevant updates is undoubtedly the introduction of the concept of "scarring/arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy", a definition that enhances the main features of the pathology and emphasizes the multiplicity of phenotypes and clinical presentations independent of etiology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Giornale italiano di cardiologia
Giornale italiano di cardiologia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Aortic valve dehiscence: the deadly face of prosthetic endocarditis]. [Dual pathway inhibition in peripheral arterial disease]. [ECG in syncope, looking for the lost signal]. [Epidermal inclusion cyst mimicking an implantable cardiac defibrillator pocket infection: a rare finding]. [European guidelines for the management of hypertension: what's new?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1