Salma M. Bahnasawy , Neil J. Parrott , Matthias Gijsen , Isabel Spriet , Lena E. Friberg , Elisabet I. Nielsen
{"title":"脓毒症中基于生理学的药代动力学模型;阐明病理生理学如何影响美罗培南药代动力学的工具:败血症中美罗培南的 PBPK 模型。","authors":"Salma M. Bahnasawy , Neil J. Parrott , Matthias Gijsen , Isabel Spriet , Lena E. Friberg , Elisabet I. Nielsen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Applying physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling in sepsis could help to better understand how PK changes are influenced by drug- and patient-related factors. We aimed to elucidate the influence of sepsis pathophysiology on the PK of meropenem by applying PBPK modelling.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A whole-body meropenem PBPK model was developed and evaluated in healthy individuals, and renally impaired non-septic patients. Sepsis-induced physiological changes in body composition, organ blood flow, kidney function, albumin, and haematocrit were implemented according to a previously proposed PBPK sepsis model. Model performance was evaluated, and a local sensitivity analysis was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The model-predicted PK metrics (AUC, C<sub>max</sub>, CL, V<sub>ss</sub>) were within 1.33-fold-error margin of published data for 87.5% of the simulated profiles in healthy individuals. In sepsis, the model provided good predictions for literature-digitised average plasma and tissue exposure data, where the model-predicted AUC was within 1.33-fold-error margin for 9 out 11 simulated study profiles. Furthermore, the model was applied to individual plasma concentration data from 52 septic patients, where the model-predicted AUC, C<sub>max</sub>, and CL had a fold-error ratio range of 0.98–1.12, with alignment of the predicted and observed variability. For V<sub>ss</sub>, the fold-error ratio was 0.81, and the model underpredicted the population variability. CL was sensitive to renal plasma clearance, and kidney volume, whereas V<sub>ss</sub> was sensitive to the unbound fraction, organ volume fraction of the interstitial compartment, and the organ volume.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings may be extended to more diverse drug types and support a more mechanistic understanding of the effect of sepsis on drug exposure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":"64 6","pages":"Article 107352"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling in sepsis: A tool to elucidate how pathophysiology affects meropenem pharmacokinetics\",\"authors\":\"Salma M. Bahnasawy , Neil J. Parrott , Matthias Gijsen , Isabel Spriet , Lena E. Friberg , Elisabet I. Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Applying physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling in sepsis could help to better understand how PK changes are influenced by drug- and patient-related factors. We aimed to elucidate the influence of sepsis pathophysiology on the PK of meropenem by applying PBPK modelling.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A whole-body meropenem PBPK model was developed and evaluated in healthy individuals, and renally impaired non-septic patients. Sepsis-induced physiological changes in body composition, organ blood flow, kidney function, albumin, and haematocrit were implemented according to a previously proposed PBPK sepsis model. Model performance was evaluated, and a local sensitivity analysis was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The model-predicted PK metrics (AUC, C<sub>max</sub>, CL, V<sub>ss</sub>) were within 1.33-fold-error margin of published data for 87.5% of the simulated profiles in healthy individuals. In sepsis, the model provided good predictions for literature-digitised average plasma and tissue exposure data, where the model-predicted AUC was within 1.33-fold-error margin for 9 out 11 simulated study profiles. Furthermore, the model was applied to individual plasma concentration data from 52 septic patients, where the model-predicted AUC, C<sub>max</sub>, and CL had a fold-error ratio range of 0.98–1.12, with alignment of the predicted and observed variability. For V<sub>ss</sub>, the fold-error ratio was 0.81, and the model underpredicted the population variability. CL was sensitive to renal plasma clearance, and kidney volume, whereas V<sub>ss</sub> was sensitive to the unbound fraction, organ volume fraction of the interstitial compartment, and the organ volume.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings may be extended to more diverse drug types and support a more mechanistic understanding of the effect of sepsis on drug exposure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"volume\":\"64 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 107352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924002681\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924002681","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling in sepsis: A tool to elucidate how pathophysiology affects meropenem pharmacokinetics
Objectives
Applying physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling in sepsis could help to better understand how PK changes are influenced by drug- and patient-related factors. We aimed to elucidate the influence of sepsis pathophysiology on the PK of meropenem by applying PBPK modelling.
Methods
A whole-body meropenem PBPK model was developed and evaluated in healthy individuals, and renally impaired non-septic patients. Sepsis-induced physiological changes in body composition, organ blood flow, kidney function, albumin, and haematocrit were implemented according to a previously proposed PBPK sepsis model. Model performance was evaluated, and a local sensitivity analysis was conducted.
Results
The model-predicted PK metrics (AUC, Cmax, CL, Vss) were within 1.33-fold-error margin of published data for 87.5% of the simulated profiles in healthy individuals. In sepsis, the model provided good predictions for literature-digitised average plasma and tissue exposure data, where the model-predicted AUC was within 1.33-fold-error margin for 9 out 11 simulated study profiles. Furthermore, the model was applied to individual plasma concentration data from 52 septic patients, where the model-predicted AUC, Cmax, and CL had a fold-error ratio range of 0.98–1.12, with alignment of the predicted and observed variability. For Vss, the fold-error ratio was 0.81, and the model underpredicted the population variability. CL was sensitive to renal plasma clearance, and kidney volume, whereas Vss was sensitive to the unbound fraction, organ volume fraction of the interstitial compartment, and the organ volume.
Conclusions
These findings may be extended to more diverse drug types and support a more mechanistic understanding of the effect of sepsis on drug exposure.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.