在莫桑比克扩大宫颈癌筛查范围:分析环形电切术(LEEP)标本。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1136/ijgc-2024-005827
Sydney Chambule, Ricardina Rangeiro, Samantha Batman, Eva Lathrop, Nafissa Osman, Andrea Neves, Arlete A N Mariano, Jean Claude Nkundabatware, Carla Carrilho, Eliane C S Monteiro, Rosita Paulo Mugolo, Joseph P Thomas, Jennifer Carns, Viviane Andrade, Hira Atif, Ellen Baker, Bryan M Fellman, Rebecca Richards-Kortum, Kathleen M Schmeler, Cesaltina Lorenzoni, Mila Pontremoli Salcedo
{"title":"在莫桑比克扩大宫颈癌筛查范围:分析环形电切术(LEEP)标本。","authors":"Sydney Chambule, Ricardina Rangeiro, Samantha Batman, Eva Lathrop, Nafissa Osman, Andrea Neves, Arlete A N Mariano, Jean Claude Nkundabatware, Carla Carrilho, Eliane C S Monteiro, Rosita Paulo Mugolo, Joseph P Thomas, Jennifer Carns, Viviane Andrade, Hira Atif, Ellen Baker, Bryan M Fellman, Rebecca Richards-Kortum, Kathleen M Schmeler, Cesaltina Lorenzoni, Mila Pontremoli Salcedo","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2024-005827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>As cervical cancer screening programs are implemented and expanded, an increasing number of women require loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for treatment of pre-invasive cervical disease. Our objective was to describe the pathological results of LEEP specimens performed as part of the MULHER study and identify factors associated with positive LEEP margins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MULHER study enrolled 9014 women who underwent HPV testing followed by visual assessment for treatment (VAT) using visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and thermal ablation for those with positive results. Participants with lesions ineligible for ablation underwent LEEP. Pathology reports were reviewed for specimen size/volume, number of fragments, pathological diagnosis and margin status. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with positive LEEP margins.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>169 participants underwent LEEP. The median age was 38 years (range 30-49). 65.1% were women living with HIV. Pathological diagnosis was available for 154 patients and included cancer (n=6, 3.9%); cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 (n=75, 48.7%); CIN 1 (n=67, 43.5%); and normal/benign findings (n=6,3.9%). 31.8% of LEEP specimens were removed in more than one fragment. The mean specimen volume was 2.9 cm<sup>3</sup> (range 0.2-15.0). LEEP margin status was available for 130 patients. Positive margins (ectocervical/endocervical only, or both) were noted in 76 (58.5%) patients and associated with HIV+status (p=0.0499) and a diagnosis of CIN 2 or worse (p=0.0197). There were no associations between margin status and age, number of fragments or specimen volume.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results showed a high number of LEEP specimens with positive margins. Additional evaluation is needed to better understand the characteristics of precancerous cervical lesions in this high-risk population. As cervical cancer screening programs are scaled in Mozambique and other lower-resource countries, there is a need to train providers to perform high-quality LEEP and for accurate and timely pathological interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"1698-1703"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scaling cervical cancer screening in Mozambique: analysis of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) specimens.\",\"authors\":\"Sydney Chambule, Ricardina Rangeiro, Samantha Batman, Eva Lathrop, Nafissa Osman, Andrea Neves, Arlete A N Mariano, Jean Claude Nkundabatware, Carla Carrilho, Eliane C S Monteiro, Rosita Paulo Mugolo, Joseph P Thomas, Jennifer Carns, Viviane Andrade, Hira Atif, Ellen Baker, Bryan M Fellman, Rebecca Richards-Kortum, Kathleen M Schmeler, Cesaltina Lorenzoni, Mila Pontremoli Salcedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ijgc-2024-005827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>As cervical cancer screening programs are implemented and expanded, an increasing number of women require loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for treatment of pre-invasive cervical disease. Our objective was to describe the pathological results of LEEP specimens performed as part of the MULHER study and identify factors associated with positive LEEP margins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MULHER study enrolled 9014 women who underwent HPV testing followed by visual assessment for treatment (VAT) using visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and thermal ablation for those with positive results. Participants with lesions ineligible for ablation underwent LEEP. Pathology reports were reviewed for specimen size/volume, number of fragments, pathological diagnosis and margin status. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with positive LEEP margins.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>169 participants underwent LEEP. The median age was 38 years (range 30-49). 65.1% were women living with HIV. Pathological diagnosis was available for 154 patients and included cancer (n=6, 3.9%); cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 (n=75, 48.7%); CIN 1 (n=67, 43.5%); and normal/benign findings (n=6,3.9%). 31.8% of LEEP specimens were removed in more than one fragment. The mean specimen volume was 2.9 cm<sup>3</sup> (range 0.2-15.0). LEEP margin status was available for 130 patients. Positive margins (ectocervical/endocervical only, or both) were noted in 76 (58.5%) patients and associated with HIV+status (p=0.0499) and a diagnosis of CIN 2 or worse (p=0.0197). There were no associations between margin status and age, number of fragments or specimen volume.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results showed a high number of LEEP specimens with positive margins. Additional evaluation is needed to better understand the characteristics of precancerous cervical lesions in this high-risk population. As cervical cancer screening programs are scaled in Mozambique and other lower-resource countries, there is a need to train providers to perform high-quality LEEP and for accurate and timely pathological interpretation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1698-1703\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005827\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005827","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:随着宫颈癌筛查计划的实施和扩大,越来越多的妇女需要采用环形电切术(LEEP)治疗浸润前宫颈疾病。我们的目的是描述作为 MULHER 研究一部分的 LEEP 标本的病理结果,并确定与 LEEP 边缘阳性相关的因素:MULHER研究共招募了9014名女性,她们接受了HPV检测,然后通过醋酸目视检查(VIA)进行治疗视觉评估(VAT),并对阳性结果进行热消融。病变不符合消融条件的参与者则接受了 LEEP。对病理报告的标本大小/体积、碎片数量、病理诊断和边缘状态进行了审查。进行了多变量回归分析,以确定与LEEP边缘阳性相关的变量:169名参与者接受了LEEP手术。中位年龄为 38 岁(30-49 岁不等)。65.1%为女性艾滋病感染者。154名患者获得了病理诊断,包括癌症(6人,占3.9%);宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)2/3(75人,占48.7%);CIN 1(67人,占43.5%);以及正常/良性结果(6人,占3.9%)。31.8%的LEEP标本被切除多个片段。标本的平均体积为 2.9 立方厘米(范围 0.2-15.0)。130例患者的LEEP切缘情况可供选择。76例(58.5%)患者的边缘呈阳性(仅宫颈外口/宫颈内口,或两者皆有),与HIV+状态(p=0.0499)和CIN 2或更严重的诊断(p=0.0197)有关。边缘状态与年龄、碎片数量或标本体积之间没有关联:结论:我们的研究结果显示,LEEP标本中边缘阳性的数量较多。结论:我们的研究结果表明,LEEP术标本中边缘阳性的数量较多,需要进行更多的评估,以更好地了解这一高风险人群宫颈癌前病变的特征。随着宫颈癌筛查项目在莫桑比克和其他资源较少的国家逐步推广,有必要对医疗服务提供者进行培训,使其能够实施高质量的LEEP术,并准确、及时地进行病理解读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scaling cervical cancer screening in Mozambique: analysis of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) specimens.

Objectives: As cervical cancer screening programs are implemented and expanded, an increasing number of women require loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for treatment of pre-invasive cervical disease. Our objective was to describe the pathological results of LEEP specimens performed as part of the MULHER study and identify factors associated with positive LEEP margins.

Methods: The MULHER study enrolled 9014 women who underwent HPV testing followed by visual assessment for treatment (VAT) using visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and thermal ablation for those with positive results. Participants with lesions ineligible for ablation underwent LEEP. Pathology reports were reviewed for specimen size/volume, number of fragments, pathological diagnosis and margin status. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with positive LEEP margins.

Results: 169 participants underwent LEEP. The median age was 38 years (range 30-49). 65.1% were women living with HIV. Pathological diagnosis was available for 154 patients and included cancer (n=6, 3.9%); cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 (n=75, 48.7%); CIN 1 (n=67, 43.5%); and normal/benign findings (n=6,3.9%). 31.8% of LEEP specimens were removed in more than one fragment. The mean specimen volume was 2.9 cm3 (range 0.2-15.0). LEEP margin status was available for 130 patients. Positive margins (ectocervical/endocervical only, or both) were noted in 76 (58.5%) patients and associated with HIV+status (p=0.0499) and a diagnosis of CIN 2 or worse (p=0.0197). There were no associations between margin status and age, number of fragments or specimen volume.

Conclusion: Our results showed a high number of LEEP specimens with positive margins. Additional evaluation is needed to better understand the characteristics of precancerous cervical lesions in this high-risk population. As cervical cancer screening programs are scaled in Mozambique and other lower-resource countries, there is a need to train providers to perform high-quality LEEP and for accurate and timely pathological interpretation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
期刊最新文献
The prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in vulvovaginal melanoma. First robotic radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer using the Hugo RAS platform. Secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent endometrial cancer: can we predict the future? Mixed neuroendocrine and endometrioid carcinoma of the endometrium: a rare aggressive malignancy. Diaphragmatic and pericardiac ovarian cancer recurrence removal and mesh reconstruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1