三种不同的腹腔镜肾积水矫正术后胚胎移植的结果。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15932
Juan Wang, Simi Liao, Yanfen Luo, Xiaofeng Pang, Rirong Li, Arshad Mehmood
{"title":"三种不同的腹腔镜肾积水矫正术后胚胎移植的结果。","authors":"Juan Wang, Simi Liao, Yanfen Luo, Xiaofeng Pang, Rirong Li, Arshad Mehmood","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effect of three different surgical approaches: simple terminal salpingostomy, bilateral proximal tubal ligation plus terminal salpingostomy, and bilateral salpingectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 292 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for hydrosalpinx and embryo transfer within 2 years postoperatively from January 2018 to August 2021. The patients were divided into three groups: Group A (68 cases) underwent simple terminal salpingostomy, Group B (199 cases) underwent ligation plus terminal salpingostomy, and Group C (25 cases) underwent bilateral salpingectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age, body mass index, surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, and infertility type showed no significant differences among the different surgical groups (P > 0.05), except for the age 30-39 group, which showed statistically significant differences in surgical time (P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (P < 0.001); the age 40 or above group showed statistically significant differences in intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.008). A total of 336 oocyte retrievals and 451 embryo transfers were successfully performed in the 292 patients within 2 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The choice of surgical approach for hydrosalpinx does not affect pregnancy rates after embryo transfer within the same age group.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The outcome of embryo transfer after three different procedures for laparoscopic correction of hydrosalpinx.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Wang, Simi Liao, Yanfen Luo, Xiaofeng Pang, Rirong Li, Arshad Mehmood\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.15932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effect of three different surgical approaches: simple terminal salpingostomy, bilateral proximal tubal ligation plus terminal salpingostomy, and bilateral salpingectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 292 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for hydrosalpinx and embryo transfer within 2 years postoperatively from January 2018 to August 2021. The patients were divided into three groups: Group A (68 cases) underwent simple terminal salpingostomy, Group B (199 cases) underwent ligation plus terminal salpingostomy, and Group C (25 cases) underwent bilateral salpingectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age, body mass index, surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, and infertility type showed no significant differences among the different surgical groups (P > 0.05), except for the age 30-39 group, which showed statistically significant differences in surgical time (P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (P < 0.001); the age 40 or above group showed statistically significant differences in intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.008). A total of 336 oocyte retrievals and 451 embryo transfers were successfully performed in the 292 patients within 2 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The choice of surgical approach for hydrosalpinx does not affect pregnancy rates after embryo transfer within the same age group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15932\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15932","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较三种不同手术方法的效果:比较单纯输卵管末端造口术、双侧输卵管近端结扎加输卵管末端造口术、双侧输卵管切除术三种不同手术方式的效果:对2018年1月至2021年8月期间接受腹腔镜手术治疗输卵管积水并在术后2年内进行胚胎移植的292例患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。患者被分为三组:A组(68例)行单纯末端输卵管造口术,B组(199例)行结扎加末端输卵管造口术,C组(25例)行双侧输卵管切除术:结果:不同手术组的年龄、体重指数、手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间和不孕类型无显著差异(P>0.05),但 30-39 岁组的手术时间差异有统计学意义(P 结论:输卵管积水患者手术方式的选择应根据患者的具体情况而定:在同一年龄组中,选择何种手术方法治疗肾积水不会影响胚胎移植后的妊娠率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The outcome of embryo transfer after three different procedures for laparoscopic correction of hydrosalpinx.

Objective: To compare the effect of three different surgical approaches: simple terminal salpingostomy, bilateral proximal tubal ligation plus terminal salpingostomy, and bilateral salpingectomy.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 292 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for hydrosalpinx and embryo transfer within 2 years postoperatively from January 2018 to August 2021. The patients were divided into three groups: Group A (68 cases) underwent simple terminal salpingostomy, Group B (199 cases) underwent ligation plus terminal salpingostomy, and Group C (25 cases) underwent bilateral salpingectomy.

Results: Age, body mass index, surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, and infertility type showed no significant differences among the different surgical groups (P > 0.05), except for the age 30-39 group, which showed statistically significant differences in surgical time (P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (P < 0.001); the age 40 or above group showed statistically significant differences in intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.008). A total of 336 oocyte retrievals and 451 embryo transfers were successfully performed in the 292 patients within 2 years postoperatively.

Conclusion: The choice of surgical approach for hydrosalpinx does not affect pregnancy rates after embryo transfer within the same age group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Routine ultrasound does not improve instrument placement at operative vaginal delivery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Beyond borders: The global impact of violating reproductive human rights. Trustworthiness criteria for meta-analyses of randomized controlled studies: OBGYN Journal guidelines. Menstrual management using the etonogestrel implant in individuals with intellectual disabilities in Joinville, Brazil. Anticoagulant therapy in pregnant women with mechanical and bioprosthetic heart valves.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1