在亚洲人群中进行反向肩关节置换术的盂部件旋转和最佳盂螺钉角度的计算机建模和验证测试。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1007/s00264-024-06340-z
Shun Sing Martin Cheng, Colin Shing-Yat Yung, Samuel De Hoi Wong, Christopher Chun Hei Yip, Issac Jun Ren Khoo, Tsoi Wan Karen Wong, Christian Fang
{"title":"在亚洲人群中进行反向肩关节置换术的盂部件旋转和最佳盂螺钉角度的计算机建模和验证测试。","authors":"Shun Sing Martin Cheng, Colin Shing-Yat Yung, Samuel De Hoi Wong, Christopher Chun Hei Yip, Issac Jun Ren Khoo, Tsoi Wan Karen Wong, Christian Fang","doi":"10.1007/s00264-024-06340-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Good initial fixation of glenoid component for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) relies on component placement and screw purchase in the scapula bone. This is especially difficult in an Asian population with small glenoid geometry. Optimal glenoid component roll angle and screw angulation to achieve the longest screws for best fixation has not been defined in the current literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Computer 3D modelling of 133 scapulas with RTSA performed were analyzed to determine patient specific optimal glenoid roll angle (GRA) for the longest bi-cortical screws attainable. The cranial-caudal angle (CCA), anterior-posterior angle (APA) and lengths for the superior and inferior screws were measured. Validation testing using calculated average (CA) angles and rounded average (RA) angles to the nearest 5 degree were recomputed for each case to determine the bi-cortical screw lengths achievable. The CA and RA screw lengths were compared against patient specific modelling using paired-sample t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average GRA was - 1.6°, almost perpendicular to the long axis of the glenoid and achieves an average bi-cortical screw length of 51.3 mm and 45.5 mm for the superior and inferior screws respectively. The CCA and APA were 9.1° cranial and 6.5° posterior for the superior screw and screw angulation of 11.2° caudal and 0.7° anterior for the inferior screw. Validation testing shows statistically shorter screw lengths in the CA and RA models compared to patient specific modelling (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Validation testing with average angles for GRA, CCA and APA demonstrates strong patient heterogeneity and anatomical variation. Despite this, screw lengths attainable in the RA group were > 38 mm with good safety profile. Surgeons may consider the additional use of navigation-assisted, or 3D printed patient specific instrumentation to optimize baseplate and screw configuration for RTSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11564314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computer modeling and validation testing for glenoid component rotation and optimal glenoid screw angles for reverse shoulder arthroplasty in an Asian population.\",\"authors\":\"Shun Sing Martin Cheng, Colin Shing-Yat Yung, Samuel De Hoi Wong, Christopher Chun Hei Yip, Issac Jun Ren Khoo, Tsoi Wan Karen Wong, Christian Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00264-024-06340-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Good initial fixation of glenoid component for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) relies on component placement and screw purchase in the scapula bone. This is especially difficult in an Asian population with small glenoid geometry. Optimal glenoid component roll angle and screw angulation to achieve the longest screws for best fixation has not been defined in the current literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Computer 3D modelling of 133 scapulas with RTSA performed were analyzed to determine patient specific optimal glenoid roll angle (GRA) for the longest bi-cortical screws attainable. The cranial-caudal angle (CCA), anterior-posterior angle (APA) and lengths for the superior and inferior screws were measured. Validation testing using calculated average (CA) angles and rounded average (RA) angles to the nearest 5 degree were recomputed for each case to determine the bi-cortical screw lengths achievable. The CA and RA screw lengths were compared against patient specific modelling using paired-sample t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average GRA was - 1.6°, almost perpendicular to the long axis of the glenoid and achieves an average bi-cortical screw length of 51.3 mm and 45.5 mm for the superior and inferior screws respectively. The CCA and APA were 9.1° cranial and 6.5° posterior for the superior screw and screw angulation of 11.2° caudal and 0.7° anterior for the inferior screw. Validation testing shows statistically shorter screw lengths in the CA and RA models compared to patient specific modelling (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Validation testing with average angles for GRA, CCA and APA demonstrates strong patient heterogeneity and anatomical variation. Despite this, screw lengths attainable in the RA group were > 38 mm with good safety profile. Surgeons may consider the additional use of navigation-assisted, or 3D printed patient specific instrumentation to optimize baseplate and screw configuration for RTSA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11564314/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06340-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06340-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:反向全肩关节置换术(RTSA)盂成形组件的良好初始固定依赖于在肩胛骨内放置组件和购买螺钉。这对于盂状结构较小的亚洲人来说尤其困难。目前的文献中还没有确定最佳的盂组件滚动角度和螺钉角度,以获得最佳固定的最长螺钉:方法:对133例实施RTSA的肩胛骨进行计算机三维建模分析,以确定患者的最佳盂臼滚动角(GRA),从而获得最长的双皮质螺钉。测量了上螺钉和下螺钉的头颅-尾椎角(CCA)、前-后角(APA)和长度。使用计算出的平均(CA)角度和最接近 5 度的圆角平均(RA)角度对每个病例进行重新计算验证测试,以确定可达到的双皮质螺钉长度。使用配对样本 t 检验将 CA 和 RA 螺钉长度与患者特定模型进行比较:平均GRA为-1.6°,几乎垂直于盂长轴,上螺钉和下螺钉的平均双皮质螺钉长度分别为51.3毫米和45.5毫米。上部螺钉的CCA和APA分别为9.1°头侧和6.5°后侧,下部螺钉的螺钉角度为11.2°尾侧和0.7°前侧。验证测试表明,与患者特定模型相比,CA 和 RA 模型的螺钉长度在统计学上更短(p 结论:CA 和 RA 模型的螺钉长度更短:使用 GRA、CCA 和 APA 的平均角度进行的验证测试表明,患者的异质性和解剖学差异很大。尽管如此,RA 组的螺钉长度仍大于 38 毫米,安全性良好。外科医生可考虑额外使用导航辅助或 3D 打印的患者专用器械,以优化 RTSA 的基板和螺钉配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Computer modeling and validation testing for glenoid component rotation and optimal glenoid screw angles for reverse shoulder arthroplasty in an Asian population.

Purpose: Good initial fixation of glenoid component for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) relies on component placement and screw purchase in the scapula bone. This is especially difficult in an Asian population with small glenoid geometry. Optimal glenoid component roll angle and screw angulation to achieve the longest screws for best fixation has not been defined in the current literature.

Methods: Computer 3D modelling of 133 scapulas with RTSA performed were analyzed to determine patient specific optimal glenoid roll angle (GRA) for the longest bi-cortical screws attainable. The cranial-caudal angle (CCA), anterior-posterior angle (APA) and lengths for the superior and inferior screws were measured. Validation testing using calculated average (CA) angles and rounded average (RA) angles to the nearest 5 degree were recomputed for each case to determine the bi-cortical screw lengths achievable. The CA and RA screw lengths were compared against patient specific modelling using paired-sample t-tests.

Results: Average GRA was - 1.6°, almost perpendicular to the long axis of the glenoid and achieves an average bi-cortical screw length of 51.3 mm and 45.5 mm for the superior and inferior screws respectively. The CCA and APA were 9.1° cranial and 6.5° posterior for the superior screw and screw angulation of 11.2° caudal and 0.7° anterior for the inferior screw. Validation testing shows statistically shorter screw lengths in the CA and RA models compared to patient specific modelling (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Validation testing with average angles for GRA, CCA and APA demonstrates strong patient heterogeneity and anatomical variation. Despite this, screw lengths attainable in the RA group were > 38 mm with good safety profile. Surgeons may consider the additional use of navigation-assisted, or 3D printed patient specific instrumentation to optimize baseplate and screw configuration for RTSA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1