核磁共振成像在区分恶性和良性膀胱狭窄方面的附加价值:一项多中心回顾性研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Japanese Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1007/s11604-024-01664-7
Ji Eun Lee, Seo-Youn Choi, Ye Rin Kim, Jisun Lee, Ji Hye Min, Jeong Ah Hwang, Sunyoung Lee, Kyeong Deok Kim, Ji Eun Moon
{"title":"核磁共振成像在区分恶性和良性膀胱狭窄方面的附加价值:一项多中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Ji Eun Lee, Seo-Youn Choi, Ye Rin Kim, Jisun Lee, Ji Hye Min, Jeong Ah Hwang, Sunyoung Lee, Kyeong Deok Kim, Ji Eun Moon","doi":"10.1007/s11604-024-01664-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the added value of using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in conjunction with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for differentiating malignant and benign ampullary strictures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The present retrospective study included 90 patients with ampullary strictures who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced MRI at two tertiary institutions. The image sets (i.e., CT alone vs. combined CT and MRI) were evaluated by three abdominal radiologists, who used a five-point Likert scale to score their confidence for diagnosing malignancy in patients with ampullary strictures. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Additionally, interobserver agreement regarding the scoring of potential malignancies of the ampullary strictures was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The addition of contrast-enhanced MRI to contrast-enhanced CT showed a significant improvement in predicting malignant ampullary strictures in all three observers (p = 0.007, 0.001, and 0.002) using ROC curve analysis, and a significant improvement was observed in diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy for predicting malignancy (p = 0.016 and 0.029 for observer 1; p = 0.023 and 0.010 for observer 2; and p = 0.010 and 0.011 for observer 3). The interobserver agreement for the five-point scale in determining malignancies of the ampullary strictures was 0.86 for CT alone and 0.93 for the combined set of CT and MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of contrast-enhanced MRI to CT provided added value for differentiating malignant from benign ampullary strictures.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The added value of MRI in distinguishing malignant and benign ampullary strictures: a multicenter retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Ji Eun Lee, Seo-Youn Choi, Ye Rin Kim, Jisun Lee, Ji Hye Min, Jeong Ah Hwang, Sunyoung Lee, Kyeong Deok Kim, Ji Eun Moon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11604-024-01664-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the added value of using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in conjunction with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for differentiating malignant and benign ampullary strictures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The present retrospective study included 90 patients with ampullary strictures who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced MRI at two tertiary institutions. The image sets (i.e., CT alone vs. combined CT and MRI) were evaluated by three abdominal radiologists, who used a five-point Likert scale to score their confidence for diagnosing malignancy in patients with ampullary strictures. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Additionally, interobserver agreement regarding the scoring of potential malignancies of the ampullary strictures was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The addition of contrast-enhanced MRI to contrast-enhanced CT showed a significant improvement in predicting malignant ampullary strictures in all three observers (p = 0.007, 0.001, and 0.002) using ROC curve analysis, and a significant improvement was observed in diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy for predicting malignancy (p = 0.016 and 0.029 for observer 1; p = 0.023 and 0.010 for observer 2; and p = 0.010 and 0.011 for observer 3). The interobserver agreement for the five-point scale in determining malignancies of the ampullary strictures was 0.86 for CT alone and 0.93 for the combined set of CT and MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of contrast-enhanced MRI to CT provided added value for differentiating malignant from benign ampullary strictures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-024-01664-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-024-01664-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究造影剂增强磁共振成像(MRI)与造影剂增强计算机断层扫描(CT)结合使用对恶性和良性膀胱狭窄进行鉴别的附加价值:本回顾性研究包括在两家三级医院接受术前对比增强 CT 和对比增强 MRI 检查的 90 名胰腺狭窄患者。三位腹部放射科医生对两组图像(即单独 CT 与 CT 和 MRI 联合成像)进行了评估,他们使用五点李克特量表对诊断膀胱狭窄患者恶性肿瘤的信心进行了评分。诊断准确性是通过接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析、灵敏度、特异性和准确性计算得出的。此外,还评估了观察者之间在对胰腺狭窄的潜在恶性肿瘤进行评分时的一致性:结果:通过ROC曲线分析,在对比增强CT的基础上增加对比增强MRI后,三位观察者预测恶性胰腺狭窄的能力均有显著提高(P = 0.007、0.001和0.002),预测恶性肿瘤的诊断敏感性和准确性也有显著提高(观察者1的P = 0.016和0.029;观察者2的P = 0.023和0.010;观察者3的P = 0.010和0.011)。在确定膀胱狭窄恶性程度的五点量表中,单纯 CT 的观察者间一致性为 0.86,CT 和 MRI 联合检查的观察者间一致性为 0.93:结论:在 CT 的基础上增加对比增强 MRI 可为区分恶性和良性胰盂狭窄提供更多价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The added value of MRI in distinguishing malignant and benign ampullary strictures: a multicenter retrospective study.

Purpose: To investigate the added value of using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in conjunction with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for differentiating malignant and benign ampullary strictures.

Materials and methods: The present retrospective study included 90 patients with ampullary strictures who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced MRI at two tertiary institutions. The image sets (i.e., CT alone vs. combined CT and MRI) were evaluated by three abdominal radiologists, who used a five-point Likert scale to score their confidence for diagnosing malignancy in patients with ampullary strictures. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Additionally, interobserver agreement regarding the scoring of potential malignancies of the ampullary strictures was assessed.

Results: The addition of contrast-enhanced MRI to contrast-enhanced CT showed a significant improvement in predicting malignant ampullary strictures in all three observers (p = 0.007, 0.001, and 0.002) using ROC curve analysis, and a significant improvement was observed in diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy for predicting malignancy (p = 0.016 and 0.029 for observer 1; p = 0.023 and 0.010 for observer 2; and p = 0.010 and 0.011 for observer 3). The interobserver agreement for the five-point scale in determining malignancies of the ampullary strictures was 0.86 for CT alone and 0.93 for the combined set of CT and MRI.

Conclusion: The addition of contrast-enhanced MRI to CT provided added value for differentiating malignant from benign ampullary strictures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Japanese Journal of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.
期刊最新文献
Advancing clinical MRI exams with artificial intelligence: Japan's contributions and future prospects. Comparative analysis of image quality and diagnostic performance among SS-EPI, MS-EPI, and rFOV DWI in bladder cancer. Artificial intelligence in fracture detection on radiographs: a literature review. Contrast-enhanced thin-slice abdominal CT with super-resolution deep learning reconstruction technique: evaluation of image quality and visibility of anatomical structures. Evaluation of nutritional parameters that may be associated with survival in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy: retrospective study conducted in a tertiary pulmonary hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1