对未进行积极治疗的癌症患者的心理干预效果:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Journal of Cancer Survivorship Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1007/s11764-024-01675-3
Kanjana Thana, Megan Miller, Rojanee Chintanawat, Chuntana Reangsing
{"title":"对未进行积极治疗的癌症患者的心理干预效果:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Kanjana Thana, Megan Miller, Rojanee Chintanawat, Chuntana Reangsing","doi":"10.1007/s11764-024-01675-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cancer and its treatment can generate substantial psychological distress (depression and anxiety). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to explore the effectiveness of dyadic interventions on psychological outcomes in cancer patients with non-active treatment and to test subgroup analyses to explore the source of heterogeneity affecting effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic searching across eight databases identified studies related to dyadic interventions for psychological outcomes of cancer patients published between 2007 and 2022. Rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria were utilized. Random-effects models were used to compute effect sizes with Hedge's g, forest plot, and Q and I<sup>2</sup> statistics to measure heterogeneity. Moderator analyses were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven primary studies were identified (938 patients with cancer, 56.14 ± 7.29 years old). Overall, dyadic interventions significantly improved depression (g = .36, 95% confidence interval .026 to .68, I<sup>2</sup> = 76%) and anxiety (g = .29, 95% confidence interval 0.14 to .45, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) compared to controls. With subgroup analyses, fidelity of dyadic interventions, number of weeks across intervention, and number of days after intervention measured were moderators affecting effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dyadic interventions appear to be effective among adults with cancer with non-active treatment. Additional research is needed to explore the efficacy of dyadic interventions among more diverse samples and to examine routes for integrating dyadic interventions into practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Adult with cancer might participate in the dyadic intervention for improving psychological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of dyadic interventions on psychological outcomes among cancer patients with non-active treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kanjana Thana, Megan Miller, Rojanee Chintanawat, Chuntana Reangsing\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11764-024-01675-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cancer and its treatment can generate substantial psychological distress (depression and anxiety). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to explore the effectiveness of dyadic interventions on psychological outcomes in cancer patients with non-active treatment and to test subgroup analyses to explore the source of heterogeneity affecting effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic searching across eight databases identified studies related to dyadic interventions for psychological outcomes of cancer patients published between 2007 and 2022. Rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria were utilized. Random-effects models were used to compute effect sizes with Hedge's g, forest plot, and Q and I<sup>2</sup> statistics to measure heterogeneity. Moderator analyses were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven primary studies were identified (938 patients with cancer, 56.14 ± 7.29 years old). Overall, dyadic interventions significantly improved depression (g = .36, 95% confidence interval .026 to .68, I<sup>2</sup> = 76%) and anxiety (g = .29, 95% confidence interval 0.14 to .45, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) compared to controls. With subgroup analyses, fidelity of dyadic interventions, number of weeks across intervention, and number of days after intervention measured were moderators affecting effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dyadic interventions appear to be effective among adults with cancer with non-active treatment. Additional research is needed to explore the efficacy of dyadic interventions among more diverse samples and to examine routes for integrating dyadic interventions into practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Adult with cancer might participate in the dyadic intervention for improving psychological outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Survivorship\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Survivorship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-024-01675-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-024-01675-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的癌症及其治疗会产生巨大的心理压力(抑郁和焦虑)。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是探讨对未进行积极治疗的癌症患者的心理干预效果,并测试亚组分析,以探索影响效应大小的异质性来源:设计:在八个数据库中进行系统检索,确定了 2007 年至 2022 年间发表的与针对癌症患者心理疗效的双向干预相关的研究。采用了严格的纳入和排除标准。采用随机效应模型计算效应大小,并用Hedge's g、森林图、Q和I2统计量来衡量异质性。研究还进行了调节因素分析:共确定了 11 项主要研究(938 名癌症患者,56.14 ± 7.29 岁)。总体而言,与对照组相比,二元干预能显著改善抑郁(g = .36,95% 置信区间为 .026 至 .68,I2 = 76%)和焦虑(g = .29,95% 置信区间为 0.14 至 .45,I2 = 0%)。在分组分析中,双向干预的忠实度、跨干预的周数和干预后测量的天数是影响效应大小的调节因素:结语:对于未接受积极治疗的成年癌症患者来说,两人一组的干预似乎是有效的。还需要进行更多的研究,以探讨在更多样化的样本中进行双向干预的有效性,并研究将双向干预纳入实践的途径。对癌症幸存者的影响:成人癌症患者可以参加干式干预,以改善心理结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of dyadic interventions on psychological outcomes among cancer patients with non-active treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: Cancer and its treatment can generate substantial psychological distress (depression and anxiety). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to explore the effectiveness of dyadic interventions on psychological outcomes in cancer patients with non-active treatment and to test subgroup analyses to explore the source of heterogeneity affecting effect sizes.

Design: Systematic searching across eight databases identified studies related to dyadic interventions for psychological outcomes of cancer patients published between 2007 and 2022. Rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria were utilized. Random-effects models were used to compute effect sizes with Hedge's g, forest plot, and Q and I2 statistics to measure heterogeneity. Moderator analyses were examined.

Results: Eleven primary studies were identified (938 patients with cancer, 56.14 ± 7.29 years old). Overall, dyadic interventions significantly improved depression (g = .36, 95% confidence interval .026 to .68, I2 = 76%) and anxiety (g = .29, 95% confidence interval 0.14 to .45, I2 = 0%) compared to controls. With subgroup analyses, fidelity of dyadic interventions, number of weeks across intervention, and number of days after intervention measured were moderators affecting effect sizes.

Conclusion: Dyadic interventions appear to be effective among adults with cancer with non-active treatment. Additional research is needed to explore the efficacy of dyadic interventions among more diverse samples and to examine routes for integrating dyadic interventions into practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Adult with cancer might participate in the dyadic intervention for improving psychological outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
10.80%
发文量
149
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Psychological and physical function in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant survivors with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Fear of cancer recurrence and its predictors among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sexual satisfaction in prostate cancer: a multi-group comparison study of treated patients, patients under active surveillance, patients with negative biopsy, and controls. Quality of life assessment in testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumour survivors. State of research, feasibility, safety, acceptability, and outcomes examined on remotely delivered exercises using technology for older adult with cancer: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1