R'ay Fodor, Abir Kalandar, Antonio Rampazzo, Raymond Isakov, Cecile Ferrando, Francis Papay, Bahar Bassiri Gharb
{"title":"确定女性化基因整形术的下巴尺寸:解剖学研究","authors":"R'ay Fodor, Abir Kalandar, Antonio Rampazzo, Raymond Isakov, Cecile Ferrando, Francis Papay, Bahar Bassiri Gharb","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Feminizing genioplasty warrants chin modification to achieve feminine characteristics. This study compared female and male facial skeletal dimensions and shape to guide feminizing genioplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Skulls stored at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History were analyzed. Sex, age, and race were documented. Heights and widths of the face and chin were measured, normalized, and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three male (43.58±12.52-y-old) and 43 female (40.48±12.04-y-old) skulls were included. Within each group, 25 skulls were of African American (AA) origin and 18 were of Caucasian (C) origin. Absolute chin heights were larger in AA and C males compared with females (P<0.05). After normalization to lower facial height, there was a trend toward greater chin height in AA males compared with females (P=0.07). Parasagittal chin width in AA males was significantly larger than AA females (P=0.0006). Interforaminal chin width in C males trended toward being significantly larger than females (P=0.08). Following normalization of chin widths, no significant sex-based differences were noted for AA skulls except for the interforaminal/intergonial ratio, which was smaller in AA males (P=0.04). For C skulls, most normalized ratios were significantly smaller in males (P<0.05). C females had wider angles at the point of maximum chin projection (P=0.007) and wider symphyseal inclinations (P<0.0001). These differences were not present in AA skulls (P>0.05). Regardless of race, male chins appeared square, whereas female chins were round.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While chin width reduction is not needed for most patients, height reduction could be considered. Chin contouring is the most central component of feminizing genioplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining Chin Dimensions for Feminizing Genioplasty: An Anatomic Study.\",\"authors\":\"R'ay Fodor, Abir Kalandar, Antonio Rampazzo, Raymond Isakov, Cecile Ferrando, Francis Papay, Bahar Bassiri Gharb\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Feminizing genioplasty warrants chin modification to achieve feminine characteristics. This study compared female and male facial skeletal dimensions and shape to guide feminizing genioplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Skulls stored at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History were analyzed. Sex, age, and race were documented. Heights and widths of the face and chin were measured, normalized, and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three male (43.58±12.52-y-old) and 43 female (40.48±12.04-y-old) skulls were included. Within each group, 25 skulls were of African American (AA) origin and 18 were of Caucasian (C) origin. Absolute chin heights were larger in AA and C males compared with females (P<0.05). After normalization to lower facial height, there was a trend toward greater chin height in AA males compared with females (P=0.07). Parasagittal chin width in AA males was significantly larger than AA females (P=0.0006). Interforaminal chin width in C males trended toward being significantly larger than females (P=0.08). Following normalization of chin widths, no significant sex-based differences were noted for AA skulls except for the interforaminal/intergonial ratio, which was smaller in AA males (P=0.04). For C skulls, most normalized ratios were significantly smaller in males (P<0.05). C females had wider angles at the point of maximum chin projection (P=0.007) and wider symphyseal inclinations (P<0.0001). These differences were not present in AA skulls (P>0.05). Regardless of race, male chins appeared square, whereas female chins were round.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While chin width reduction is not needed for most patients, height reduction could be considered. Chin contouring is the most central component of feminizing genioplasty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010618\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010618","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determining Chin Dimensions for Feminizing Genioplasty: An Anatomic Study.
Background: Feminizing genioplasty warrants chin modification to achieve feminine characteristics. This study compared female and male facial skeletal dimensions and shape to guide feminizing genioplasty.
Methods: Skulls stored at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History were analyzed. Sex, age, and race were documented. Heights and widths of the face and chin were measured, normalized, and compared.
Results: Forty-three male (43.58±12.52-y-old) and 43 female (40.48±12.04-y-old) skulls were included. Within each group, 25 skulls were of African American (AA) origin and 18 were of Caucasian (C) origin. Absolute chin heights were larger in AA and C males compared with females (P<0.05). After normalization to lower facial height, there was a trend toward greater chin height in AA males compared with females (P=0.07). Parasagittal chin width in AA males was significantly larger than AA females (P=0.0006). Interforaminal chin width in C males trended toward being significantly larger than females (P=0.08). Following normalization of chin widths, no significant sex-based differences were noted for AA skulls except for the interforaminal/intergonial ratio, which was smaller in AA males (P=0.04). For C skulls, most normalized ratios were significantly smaller in males (P<0.05). C females had wider angles at the point of maximum chin projection (P=0.007) and wider symphyseal inclinations (P<0.0001). These differences were not present in AA skulls (P>0.05). Regardless of race, male chins appeared square, whereas female chins were round.
Conclusions: While chin width reduction is not needed for most patients, height reduction could be considered. Chin contouring is the most central component of feminizing genioplasty.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.