通用标准是否接受之前经过验证的血压自我测量设备?系统回顾。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000003859
Estefanie Siqueira Vigato de Oliveira, Nila Larisse Silva de Albuquerque, Priscila Rangel Dordetto, José Luiz Tatagiba Lamas
{"title":"通用标准是否接受之前经过验证的血压自我测量设备?系统回顾。","authors":"Estefanie Siqueira Vigato de Oliveira, Nila Larisse Silva de Albuquerque, Priscila Rangel Dordetto, José Luiz Tatagiba Lamas","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000003859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to analyze whether oscillometric blood pressure devices validated for the general population may be considered approved under Universal Standard criteria. A systematic review was conducted, with searches in nine databases, up to September 2023, including 32 validation studies of noninvasive arm cuff devices for self-measurement. The British Hypertension Society protocol was most common (68%), followed by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (40%). Most devices met Universal Standard criterion 1, but only 17 (53%) met criterion 2. Few studies contained details about the choice of cuffs, the number of participants by arm circumference, or the differences between methods by cuff subgroup. Due to the considerable differences between validation protocols, 53% of the devices analyzed were approved under the Universal Standard. The study contributes to expanding the validated pool of self-measurement devices under the Universal Standard.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are previously validated blood pressure self-measurement devices accepted under the Universal Standard? A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Estefanie Siqueira Vigato de Oliveira, Nila Larisse Silva de Albuquerque, Priscila Rangel Dordetto, José Luiz Tatagiba Lamas\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HJH.0000000000003859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to analyze whether oscillometric blood pressure devices validated for the general population may be considered approved under Universal Standard criteria. A systematic review was conducted, with searches in nine databases, up to September 2023, including 32 validation studies of noninvasive arm cuff devices for self-measurement. The British Hypertension Society protocol was most common (68%), followed by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (40%). Most devices met Universal Standard criterion 1, but only 17 (53%) met criterion 2. Few studies contained details about the choice of cuffs, the number of participants by arm circumference, or the differences between methods by cuff subgroup. Due to the considerable differences between validation protocols, 53% of the devices analyzed were approved under the Universal Standard. The study contributes to expanding the validated pool of self-measurement devices under the Universal Standard.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003859\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003859","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析针对普通人群验证的示波测量血压装置是否可被视为符合《通用标准》标准。研究人员对截至 2023 年 9 月的 9 个数据库进行了系统性检索,其中包括 32 项关于用于自我测量的无创臂带式血压计的验证研究。最常见的是英国高血压学会协议(68%),其次是医学仪器促进协会协议(40%)。大多数设备符合通用标准准则 1,但只有 17 台(53%)符合准则 2。很少有研究详细说明袖带的选择、按臂围划分的参与者人数或按袖带分组划分的方法之间的差异。由于验证方案之间存在很大差异,53% 的分析设备是根据通用标准批准的。这项研究有助于扩大通用标准下的自我测量设备验证库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are previously validated blood pressure self-measurement devices accepted under the Universal Standard? A systematic review.

This study aimed to analyze whether oscillometric blood pressure devices validated for the general population may be considered approved under Universal Standard criteria. A systematic review was conducted, with searches in nine databases, up to September 2023, including 32 validation studies of noninvasive arm cuff devices for self-measurement. The British Hypertension Society protocol was most common (68%), followed by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (40%). Most devices met Universal Standard criterion 1, but only 17 (53%) met criterion 2. Few studies contained details about the choice of cuffs, the number of participants by arm circumference, or the differences between methods by cuff subgroup. Due to the considerable differences between validation protocols, 53% of the devices analyzed were approved under the Universal Standard. The study contributes to expanding the validated pool of self-measurement devices under the Universal Standard.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1