TOMAC疗法治疗药物难治性不安腿综合征的成本效益:基于扩展研究数据的最新分析。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2024.2410595
Anne M Ryschon, Asim Roy, Jan B Pietzsch
{"title":"TOMAC疗法治疗药物难治性不安腿综合征的成本效益:基于扩展研究数据的最新分析。","authors":"Anne M Ryschon, Asim Roy, Jan B Pietzsch","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2410595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Patients with medication-refractory restless legs syndrome (RLS) have limited therapeutic options available for symptom relief. Tonic motor activation (TOMAC) presents a novel, non-invasive therapy for this patient population. The aim of this study was to conduct an updated cost-effectiveness analysis of TOMAC therapy based on recently available longer-term follow-up data.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A previously published decision-analytic Markov model was utilized to project strategy-specific costs and outcomes over three-years and lifetime for TOMAC compared to status quo treatment (control). Cohort characteristics were based on 24-week clinical data from the extension cohort of the RESTFUL study, which included longer-term follow-up of RESTFUL completers who were assigned to continue or discontinue TOMAC use (TOMAC and control, respectively). The primary analysis outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in $ per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, calculated using change in International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) score as the effect measure. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TOMAC treatment improved IRLS by 5.9 versus control, resulting in estimated utility improvement of +0.05. Over three-years and lifetime, TOMAC added 0.14 and 0.73 QALYs, at incremental costs of $6,751 and $27,440, resulting in projected ICERs of $47,609 and $37,823 per QALY gained, respectively. TOMAC was found to be cost-effective across all tested sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Limitations and conclusion: </strong>The inclusion of longer follow-up data in the current analysis confirms earlier exploratory cost-effectiveness findings and suggest TOMAC therapy may provide a high-value treatment option for patients with medication-refractory RLS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness of TOMAC therapy for medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: an updated analysis based on Extension study data.\",\"authors\":\"Anne M Ryschon, Asim Roy, Jan B Pietzsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13696998.2024.2410595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Patients with medication-refractory restless legs syndrome (RLS) have limited therapeutic options available for symptom relief. Tonic motor activation (TOMAC) presents a novel, non-invasive therapy for this patient population. The aim of this study was to conduct an updated cost-effectiveness analysis of TOMAC therapy based on recently available longer-term follow-up data.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A previously published decision-analytic Markov model was utilized to project strategy-specific costs and outcomes over three-years and lifetime for TOMAC compared to status quo treatment (control). Cohort characteristics were based on 24-week clinical data from the extension cohort of the RESTFUL study, which included longer-term follow-up of RESTFUL completers who were assigned to continue or discontinue TOMAC use (TOMAC and control, respectively). The primary analysis outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in $ per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, calculated using change in International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) score as the effect measure. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TOMAC treatment improved IRLS by 5.9 versus control, resulting in estimated utility improvement of +0.05. Over three-years and lifetime, TOMAC added 0.14 and 0.73 QALYs, at incremental costs of $6,751 and $27,440, resulting in projected ICERs of $47,609 and $37,823 per QALY gained, respectively. TOMAC was found to be cost-effective across all tested sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Limitations and conclusion: </strong>The inclusion of longer follow-up data in the current analysis confirms earlier exploratory cost-effectiveness findings and suggest TOMAC therapy may provide a high-value treatment option for patients with medication-refractory RLS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2410595\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2410595","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的药物难治性不宁腿综合征(RLS)患者可用于缓解症状的治疗方法有限。强直性运动激活疗法(TOMAC)是针对这一患者群体的一种新型非侵入性疗法。本研究的目的是根据最近获得的长期随访数据,对 TOMAC 疗法进行最新的成本效益分析。材料与方法利用之前发表的决策分析马尔可夫模型,预测 TOMAC 与维持现状治疗(对照组)相比,三年内和终生的特定策略成本和疗效。队列特征基于RESTFUL研究扩展队列的24周临床数据,其中包括对RESTFUL研究完成者的长期随访,这些完成者被分配继续或停止使用TOMAC(分别为TOMAC和对照组)。主要分析结果是以每质量调整生命年(QALY)收益美元为单位的增量成本效益比(ICER),以国际RLS研究组评定量表(IRLS)评分的变化作为效果衡量标准进行计算。结果TOMAC治疗与对照组相比,IRLS提高了5.9分,估计效用提高了+0.05分。在三年和终生期间,TOMAC分别增加了0.14和0.73 QALY,增量成本分别为6,751美元和27,440美元,预计每QALY增益的ICER分别为47,609美元和37,823美元。在所有测试的敏感性分析中,TOMAC均被认为具有成本效益。局限性和结论在当前分析中纳入更长时间的随访数据证实了之前的探索性成本效益研究结果,并表明TOMAC疗法可为药物难治性RLS患者提供一种高价值的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost-effectiveness of TOMAC therapy for medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: an updated analysis based on Extension study data.

Aims: Patients with medication-refractory restless legs syndrome (RLS) have limited therapeutic options available for symptom relief. Tonic motor activation (TOMAC) presents a novel, non-invasive therapy for this patient population. The aim of this study was to conduct an updated cost-effectiveness analysis of TOMAC therapy based on recently available longer-term follow-up data.

Materials and methods: A previously published decision-analytic Markov model was utilized to project strategy-specific costs and outcomes over three-years and lifetime for TOMAC compared to status quo treatment (control). Cohort characteristics were based on 24-week clinical data from the extension cohort of the RESTFUL study, which included longer-term follow-up of RESTFUL completers who were assigned to continue or discontinue TOMAC use (TOMAC and control, respectively). The primary analysis outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in $ per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, calculated using change in International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) score as the effect measure. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results: TOMAC treatment improved IRLS by 5.9 versus control, resulting in estimated utility improvement of +0.05. Over three-years and lifetime, TOMAC added 0.14 and 0.73 QALYs, at incremental costs of $6,751 and $27,440, resulting in projected ICERs of $47,609 and $37,823 per QALY gained, respectively. TOMAC was found to be cost-effective across all tested sensitivity analyses.

Limitations and conclusion: The inclusion of longer follow-up data in the current analysis confirms earlier exploratory cost-effectiveness findings and suggest TOMAC therapy may provide a high-value treatment option for patients with medication-refractory RLS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
期刊最新文献
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and the value of increasing treatment for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis: a plain language summary. Employment status of multiple sclerosis patients in Japan. Relationship between a diagnosis of kidney failure and heart diseases in patients with hyperkalaemia. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of Acalabrutinib versus Ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a lung cancer screening program in the netherlands: a simulation based on NELSON and NLST study outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1