{"title":"丁丙诺啡治疗癌症疼痛:系统综述的结果。","authors":"Maria Silveira, Victoria Powell","doi":"10.5055/bupe.24.rpj.1075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Buprenorphine may be safer and better-tolerated than full mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonists. Whether it effectively controls cancer-related pain is unclear. A prior review (Cochrane 2015) did not support prioritizing buprenorphine over full MOR agonists for cancer-associated pain.</p><p><strong>Purpose/hypothesis: </strong>We conducted an updated systematic review of buprenorphine's effect on cancer- related pain including both new studies and additional study designs. Procedures/data/observations: We searched Cochrane, OVID Medline, EMBASE, EBSCO and Web of Science for studies published in any language up to May 2023 for studies that examined buprenorphine's impact upon pain severity/intensity in patients with active cancer. Risk of bias and study quality were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort and casecontrol studies. Data were synthesized using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/applications: </strong>2322 publications were identified and 42 studies were included (14 RCTs, 10 pre-post uncontrolled, 5 cohort, and 2 case-control studies). All had moderate-high risk of bias. One RCT showed buprenorphine was superior to placebo. 11 RCTs (12 papers) showed buprenorphine was as effective as full MOR agonists for cancer pain. 10-30 percent of cancer patients trialing buprenorphine did not achieve adequate response.</p>","PeriodicalId":16601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of opioid management","volume":"20 4","pages":"B12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Buprenorphine for Cancer Pain: Results from a Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Silveira, Victoria Powell\",\"doi\":\"10.5055/bupe.24.rpj.1075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Buprenorphine may be safer and better-tolerated than full mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonists. Whether it effectively controls cancer-related pain is unclear. A prior review (Cochrane 2015) did not support prioritizing buprenorphine over full MOR agonists for cancer-associated pain.</p><p><strong>Purpose/hypothesis: </strong>We conducted an updated systematic review of buprenorphine's effect on cancer- related pain including both new studies and additional study designs. Procedures/data/observations: We searched Cochrane, OVID Medline, EMBASE, EBSCO and Web of Science for studies published in any language up to May 2023 for studies that examined buprenorphine's impact upon pain severity/intensity in patients with active cancer. Risk of bias and study quality were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort and casecontrol studies. Data were synthesized using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/applications: </strong>2322 publications were identified and 42 studies were included (14 RCTs, 10 pre-post uncontrolled, 5 cohort, and 2 case-control studies). All had moderate-high risk of bias. One RCT showed buprenorphine was superior to placebo. 11 RCTs (12 papers) showed buprenorphine was as effective as full MOR agonists for cancer pain. 10-30 percent of cancer patients trialing buprenorphine did not achieve adequate response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of opioid management\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"B12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of opioid management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5055/bupe.24.rpj.1075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of opioid management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/bupe.24.rpj.1075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:丁丙诺啡可能比完全μ阿片受体(MOR)激动剂更安全,耐受性更好。它是否能有效控制癌症相关疼痛尚不清楚。之前的一项综述(Cochrane,2015 年)不支持将丁丙诺啡优先于全 MOR 激动剂用于治疗癌症相关疼痛:我们对丁丙诺啡对癌症相关疼痛的影响进行了最新的系统综述,包括新的研究和额外的研究设计。程序/数据/观察结果:我们检索了 Cochrane、OVID Medline、EMBASE、EBSCO 和 Web of Science 中截至 2023 年 5 月以任何语言发表的研究,以了解丁丙诺啡对活动性癌症患者疼痛严重程度/强度的影响。对随机对照试验(RCT)采用 Cochrane 协作工具评估偏倚风险和研究质量,对队列和病例对照研究采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。采用建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)标准对数据进行综合:共鉴定了 2322 篇出版物,并纳入了 42 项研究(14 项研究性临床试验、10 项前后无对照研究、5 项队列研究和 2 项病例对照研究)。所有研究都存在中度-高度偏倚风险。一项研究表明丁丙诺啡优于安慰剂。11 项研究性试验(12 篇论文)显示,丁丙诺啡与完全 MOR 促效剂对治疗癌症疼痛同样有效。10%-30%试用丁丙诺啡的癌症患者没有获得足够的反应。
Buprenorphine for Cancer Pain: Results from a Systematic Review.
Background: Buprenorphine may be safer and better-tolerated than full mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonists. Whether it effectively controls cancer-related pain is unclear. A prior review (Cochrane 2015) did not support prioritizing buprenorphine over full MOR agonists for cancer-associated pain.
Purpose/hypothesis: We conducted an updated systematic review of buprenorphine's effect on cancer- related pain including both new studies and additional study designs. Procedures/data/observations: We searched Cochrane, OVID Medline, EMBASE, EBSCO and Web of Science for studies published in any language up to May 2023 for studies that examined buprenorphine's impact upon pain severity/intensity in patients with active cancer. Risk of bias and study quality were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort and casecontrol studies. Data were synthesized using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria.
Conclusions/applications: 2322 publications were identified and 42 studies were included (14 RCTs, 10 pre-post uncontrolled, 5 cohort, and 2 case-control studies). All had moderate-high risk of bias. One RCT showed buprenorphine was superior to placebo. 11 RCTs (12 papers) showed buprenorphine was as effective as full MOR agonists for cancer pain. 10-30 percent of cancer patients trialing buprenorphine did not achieve adequate response.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Opioid Management deals with all aspects of opioids. From basic science, pre-clinical, clinical, abuse, compliance and addiction medicine, the journal provides and unbiased forum for researchers and clinicians to explore and manage the complexities of opioid prescription.