帕金森病病耻感问卷(PDStigmaQuest)的验证研究。

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Parkinson's disease Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/JPD-240224
Vasilija Stopic, Stefanie T Jost, Julius Haupt, Gregor A Brandt, Christina van der Linden, Jan Niklas Petry-Schmelzer, Till A Dembek, Gereon R Fink, Lucia Batzu, Alexandra Rizos, K Ray Chaudhuri, Haidar S Dafsari, Doreen Gruber, Georg Ebersbach, Josef Kessler, Michael T Barbe, Anna Sauerbier
{"title":"帕金森病病耻感问卷(PDStigmaQuest)的验证研究。","authors":"Vasilija Stopic, Stefanie T Jost, Julius Haupt, Gregor A Brandt, Christina van der Linden, Jan Niklas Petry-Schmelzer, Till A Dembek, Gereon R Fink, Lucia Batzu, Alexandra Rizos, K Ray Chaudhuri, Haidar S Dafsari, Doreen Gruber, Georg Ebersbach, Josef Kessler, Michael T Barbe, Anna Sauerbier","doi":"10.3233/JPD-240224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stigma is a relevant aspect of Parkinson's disease (PD). Specific stigma tools are needed to address the complex construct of stigma in PD comprehensively.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the dimensionality and psychometric properties of the newly developed Parkinson's Disease Stigma Questionnaire (PDStigmaQuest).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multi-center, cross-sectional study including PD patients and healthy controls, the dimensionality of the PDStigmaQuest was examined through exploratory factor analysis. Acceptability and psychometric properties were investigated. PDStigmaQuest scores of patients and healthy controls were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 201 PD patients and 101 healthy controls were included in the final analysis. Results suggested high data quality of the PDStigmaQuest (0.0001% missing data for patients). The exploratory factor analysis produced four factors: felt stigma, hiding, enacted stigma: rejection, and enacted stigma: patronization, explaining 47.9% of variance. An optional work domain for employed patients was included. Moderate floor effects and skewness, but no ceiling effects were found. Cronbach's alpha of 0.85 indicated high internal consistency. Calculated item-total correlations met standard criteria. Test-retest reliability was high (rs = 0.83). PDStigmaQuest scores correlated significantly with other stigma measures (rs = 0.56-0.69) and were significantly higher in patients than in healthy controls and higher in patients with depressive symptoms than in those without.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patient-reported 18-item PDStigmaQuest showed strong psychometric properties of validity and reliability. Our results suggest that the PDStigmaQuest can be used to assess and evaluate stigma comprehensively in PD, which will improve our understanding of the construct of PD stigma.</p>","PeriodicalId":16660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parkinson's disease","volume":" ","pages":"1469-1480"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation Study of the Parkinson's Disease Stigma Questionnaire (PDStigmaQuest).\",\"authors\":\"Vasilija Stopic, Stefanie T Jost, Julius Haupt, Gregor A Brandt, Christina van der Linden, Jan Niklas Petry-Schmelzer, Till A Dembek, Gereon R Fink, Lucia Batzu, Alexandra Rizos, K Ray Chaudhuri, Haidar S Dafsari, Doreen Gruber, Georg Ebersbach, Josef Kessler, Michael T Barbe, Anna Sauerbier\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/JPD-240224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stigma is a relevant aspect of Parkinson's disease (PD). Specific stigma tools are needed to address the complex construct of stigma in PD comprehensively.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the dimensionality and psychometric properties of the newly developed Parkinson's Disease Stigma Questionnaire (PDStigmaQuest).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multi-center, cross-sectional study including PD patients and healthy controls, the dimensionality of the PDStigmaQuest was examined through exploratory factor analysis. Acceptability and psychometric properties were investigated. PDStigmaQuest scores of patients and healthy controls were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 201 PD patients and 101 healthy controls were included in the final analysis. Results suggested high data quality of the PDStigmaQuest (0.0001% missing data for patients). The exploratory factor analysis produced four factors: felt stigma, hiding, enacted stigma: rejection, and enacted stigma: patronization, explaining 47.9% of variance. An optional work domain for employed patients was included. Moderate floor effects and skewness, but no ceiling effects were found. Cronbach's alpha of 0.85 indicated high internal consistency. Calculated item-total correlations met standard criteria. Test-retest reliability was high (rs = 0.83). PDStigmaQuest scores correlated significantly with other stigma measures (rs = 0.56-0.69) and were significantly higher in patients than in healthy controls and higher in patients with depressive symptoms than in those without.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patient-reported 18-item PDStigmaQuest showed strong psychometric properties of validity and reliability. Our results suggest that the PDStigmaQuest can be used to assess and evaluate stigma comprehensively in PD, which will improve our understanding of the construct of PD stigma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Parkinson's disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1469-1480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492143/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Parkinson's disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-240224\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parkinson's disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-240224","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:成见是帕金森病(PD)的一个相关方面。需要专门的成见工具来全面解决帕金森病成见这一复杂问题:测试新开发的帕金森病病耻感问卷(PDStigmaQuest)的维度和心理测量特性:在这项包括帕金森病患者和健康对照者的多中心横断面研究中,通过探索性因子分析检验了帕金森病病耻感问卷的维度。研究还调查了可接受性和心理测量特性。比较了患者和健康对照组的 PDStigmaQuest 分数:共有 201 名 PD 患者和 101 名健康对照者参与了最终分析。结果表明,PDStigmaQuest 的数据质量很高(患者数据缺失率为 0.0001%)。探索性因子分析产生了四个因子:感受到的成见、隐藏、形成的成见:拒绝和形成的成见:赞助,解释了 47.9% 的方差。此外,还包括一个针对就业患者的可选工作域。研究发现了适度的下限效应和偏斜效应,但没有发现上限效应。Cronbach's alpha 为 0.85,表明内部一致性较高。计算出的项目-总相关性符合标准。测试-再测可靠性高(rs = 0.83)。PDStigmaQuest得分与其他耻辱感测量结果有显著相关性(rs = 0.56-0.69),患者的得分明显高于健康对照组,有抑郁症状的患者的得分高于无抑郁症状的患者:由患者报告的 18 个项目的 PDStigmaQuest 显示出很强的心理测量特性,具有很高的有效性和可靠性。我们的研究结果表明,PDStigmaQuest 可用于全面评估和评价帕金森病患者的病耻感,这将加深我们对帕金森病病耻感结构的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation Study of the Parkinson's Disease Stigma Questionnaire (PDStigmaQuest).

Background: Stigma is a relevant aspect of Parkinson's disease (PD). Specific stigma tools are needed to address the complex construct of stigma in PD comprehensively.

Objective: To test the dimensionality and psychometric properties of the newly developed Parkinson's Disease Stigma Questionnaire (PDStigmaQuest).

Methods: In this multi-center, cross-sectional study including PD patients and healthy controls, the dimensionality of the PDStigmaQuest was examined through exploratory factor analysis. Acceptability and psychometric properties were investigated. PDStigmaQuest scores of patients and healthy controls were compared.

Results: In total, 201 PD patients and 101 healthy controls were included in the final analysis. Results suggested high data quality of the PDStigmaQuest (0.0001% missing data for patients). The exploratory factor analysis produced four factors: felt stigma, hiding, enacted stigma: rejection, and enacted stigma: patronization, explaining 47.9% of variance. An optional work domain for employed patients was included. Moderate floor effects and skewness, but no ceiling effects were found. Cronbach's alpha of 0.85 indicated high internal consistency. Calculated item-total correlations met standard criteria. Test-retest reliability was high (rs = 0.83). PDStigmaQuest scores correlated significantly with other stigma measures (rs = 0.56-0.69) and were significantly higher in patients than in healthy controls and higher in patients with depressive symptoms than in those without.

Conclusions: The patient-reported 18-item PDStigmaQuest showed strong psychometric properties of validity and reliability. Our results suggest that the PDStigmaQuest can be used to assess and evaluate stigma comprehensively in PD, which will improve our understanding of the construct of PD stigma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
5.80%
发文量
338
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Parkinson''s Disease (JPD) publishes original research in basic science, translational research and clinical medicine in Parkinson’s disease in cooperation with the Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease. It features a first class Editorial Board and provides rigorous peer review and rapid online publication.
期刊最新文献
Prospective Study of Lung Function with Prodromal, Clinical Parkinson's Disease, and Mortality. Winding Back the Clock on Advanced Therapies: It's Time to Get Smart. Non-Pharmacological Interventions for People with Parkinson's Disease: Are We Entering a New Era? Prospective Role of PAK6 and 14-3-3γ as Biomarkers for Parkinson’s Disease U.S. Tax Credits to Promote Practical Proactive Preventative Care for Parkinson’s Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1