Arife Ezgi Telli, Yusuf Biçer, Nihat Telli, Gonca Sönmez, Gamze Turkal, İsmail Güzel
{"title":"家禽屠宰线的细菌微生物组多样性:从鸡屠体和环境来源中获得的启示。","authors":"Arife Ezgi Telli, Yusuf Biçer, Nihat Telli, Gonca Sönmez, Gamze Turkal, İsmail Güzel","doi":"10.2478/jvetres-2024-0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to determine the bacterial diversity of chicken carcasses and their surrounding environment at various stages along a poultry slaughter line.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene was employed to assess the shifts in bacterial community diversity at both phylum and genus levels. Samples were collected from September to November 2021, targeting carcass surfaces at various operational stages (post-defeathering, post-evisceration, post-water chilling, and post-cooling), as well as from the internal environments and air of these units. The study took place in a vertically integrated poultry slaughterhouse in Konya, Turkey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Microbial diversity increased after the chilling and storage stages as a result of redistribution of the microorganisms after the physical effect of the slaughtering stages. The final product sample taken after storage had the highest bacterial abundance. The abundance at this stage was found to be strongly correlated with that at other slaughtering stages, as well as with the abundance in chilling water and on the personnel's hands. The common genera in chicken carcasses during slaughter stages were <i>Macrococcus</i>, <i>Acinetobacter</i>, <i>Enterococcus</i>, <i>Escherichia-Shigella</i>, <i>Psychrobacter</i>, <i>Streptococcus</i>, <i>Lactococcus</i> and <i>Ligilactobacillus</i>. Microbiome data in environmental samples indicated that the genera in highest relative abundance were <i>Bacillus</i>, <i>Anoxybacillus</i>, <i>Acinetobacter</i> and <i>Psychrobacter</i>. In air samples, the storage room had the highest diversity and in this place <i>Bacillus</i> spp. and <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. were in the majority.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study may provide some useful information to pinpoint the critical contamination sources in the poultry slaughtering process.</p>","PeriodicalId":17617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Research","volume":"68 3","pages":"337-345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacterial microbiome diversity along poultry slaughtering lines: insights from chicken carcasses and environmental sources.\",\"authors\":\"Arife Ezgi Telli, Yusuf Biçer, Nihat Telli, Gonca Sönmez, Gamze Turkal, İsmail Güzel\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/jvetres-2024-0051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to determine the bacterial diversity of chicken carcasses and their surrounding environment at various stages along a poultry slaughter line.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene was employed to assess the shifts in bacterial community diversity at both phylum and genus levels. Samples were collected from September to November 2021, targeting carcass surfaces at various operational stages (post-defeathering, post-evisceration, post-water chilling, and post-cooling), as well as from the internal environments and air of these units. The study took place in a vertically integrated poultry slaughterhouse in Konya, Turkey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Microbial diversity increased after the chilling and storage stages as a result of redistribution of the microorganisms after the physical effect of the slaughtering stages. The final product sample taken after storage had the highest bacterial abundance. The abundance at this stage was found to be strongly correlated with that at other slaughtering stages, as well as with the abundance in chilling water and on the personnel's hands. The common genera in chicken carcasses during slaughter stages were <i>Macrococcus</i>, <i>Acinetobacter</i>, <i>Enterococcus</i>, <i>Escherichia-Shigella</i>, <i>Psychrobacter</i>, <i>Streptococcus</i>, <i>Lactococcus</i> and <i>Ligilactobacillus</i>. Microbiome data in environmental samples indicated that the genera in highest relative abundance were <i>Bacillus</i>, <i>Anoxybacillus</i>, <i>Acinetobacter</i> and <i>Psychrobacter</i>. In air samples, the storage room had the highest diversity and in this place <i>Bacillus</i> spp. and <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. were in the majority.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study may provide some useful information to pinpoint the critical contamination sources in the poultry slaughtering process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Veterinary Research\",\"volume\":\"68 3\",\"pages\":\"337-345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424139/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Veterinary Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2024-0051\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2024-0051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bacterial microbiome diversity along poultry slaughtering lines: insights from chicken carcasses and environmental sources.
Introduction: This study aimed to determine the bacterial diversity of chicken carcasses and their surrounding environment at various stages along a poultry slaughter line.
Material and methods: Amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene was employed to assess the shifts in bacterial community diversity at both phylum and genus levels. Samples were collected from September to November 2021, targeting carcass surfaces at various operational stages (post-defeathering, post-evisceration, post-water chilling, and post-cooling), as well as from the internal environments and air of these units. The study took place in a vertically integrated poultry slaughterhouse in Konya, Turkey.
Results: Microbial diversity increased after the chilling and storage stages as a result of redistribution of the microorganisms after the physical effect of the slaughtering stages. The final product sample taken after storage had the highest bacterial abundance. The abundance at this stage was found to be strongly correlated with that at other slaughtering stages, as well as with the abundance in chilling water and on the personnel's hands. The common genera in chicken carcasses during slaughter stages were Macrococcus, Acinetobacter, Enterococcus, Escherichia-Shigella, Psychrobacter, Streptococcus, Lactococcus and Ligilactobacillus. Microbiome data in environmental samples indicated that the genera in highest relative abundance were Bacillus, Anoxybacillus, Acinetobacter and Psychrobacter. In air samples, the storage room had the highest diversity and in this place Bacillus spp. and Staphylococcus spp. were in the majority.
Conclusion: This study may provide some useful information to pinpoint the critical contamination sources in the poultry slaughtering process.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Veterinary Research (formerly Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy) is a quarterly that publishes original papers, review articles and short communications on bacteriology, virology, parasitology, immunology, molecular biology, pathology, toxicology, pharmacology, and biochemistry. The main emphasis is, however, on infectious diseases of animals, food safety and public health, and clinical sciences.