家禽屠宰线的细菌微生物组多样性:从鸡屠体和环境来源中获得的启示。

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Journal of Veterinary Research Pub Date : 2024-09-23 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.2478/jvetres-2024-0051
Arife Ezgi Telli, Yusuf Biçer, Nihat Telli, Gonca Sönmez, Gamze Turkal, İsmail Güzel
{"title":"家禽屠宰线的细菌微生物组多样性:从鸡屠体和环境来源中获得的启示。","authors":"Arife Ezgi Telli, Yusuf Biçer, Nihat Telli, Gonca Sönmez, Gamze Turkal, İsmail Güzel","doi":"10.2478/jvetres-2024-0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to determine the bacterial diversity of chicken carcasses and their surrounding environment at various stages along a poultry slaughter line.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene was employed to assess the shifts in bacterial community diversity at both phylum and genus levels. Samples were collected from September to November 2021, targeting carcass surfaces at various operational stages (post-defeathering, post-evisceration, post-water chilling, and post-cooling), as well as from the internal environments and air of these units. The study took place in a vertically integrated poultry slaughterhouse in Konya, Turkey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Microbial diversity increased after the chilling and storage stages as a result of redistribution of the microorganisms after the physical effect of the slaughtering stages. The final product sample taken after storage had the highest bacterial abundance. The abundance at this stage was found to be strongly correlated with that at other slaughtering stages, as well as with the abundance in chilling water and on the personnel's hands. The common genera in chicken carcasses during slaughter stages were <i>Macrococcus</i>, <i>Acinetobacter</i>, <i>Enterococcus</i>, <i>Escherichia-Shigella</i>, <i>Psychrobacter</i>, <i>Streptococcus</i>, <i>Lactococcus</i> and <i>Ligilactobacillus</i>. Microbiome data in environmental samples indicated that the genera in highest relative abundance were <i>Bacillus</i>, <i>Anoxybacillus</i>, <i>Acinetobacter</i> and <i>Psychrobacter</i>. In air samples, the storage room had the highest diversity and in this place <i>Bacillus</i> spp. and <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. were in the majority.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study may provide some useful information to pinpoint the critical contamination sources in the poultry slaughtering process.</p>","PeriodicalId":17617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Research","volume":"68 3","pages":"337-345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacterial microbiome diversity along poultry slaughtering lines: insights from chicken carcasses and environmental sources.\",\"authors\":\"Arife Ezgi Telli, Yusuf Biçer, Nihat Telli, Gonca Sönmez, Gamze Turkal, İsmail Güzel\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/jvetres-2024-0051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to determine the bacterial diversity of chicken carcasses and their surrounding environment at various stages along a poultry slaughter line.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene was employed to assess the shifts in bacterial community diversity at both phylum and genus levels. Samples were collected from September to November 2021, targeting carcass surfaces at various operational stages (post-defeathering, post-evisceration, post-water chilling, and post-cooling), as well as from the internal environments and air of these units. The study took place in a vertically integrated poultry slaughterhouse in Konya, Turkey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Microbial diversity increased after the chilling and storage stages as a result of redistribution of the microorganisms after the physical effect of the slaughtering stages. The final product sample taken after storage had the highest bacterial abundance. The abundance at this stage was found to be strongly correlated with that at other slaughtering stages, as well as with the abundance in chilling water and on the personnel's hands. The common genera in chicken carcasses during slaughter stages were <i>Macrococcus</i>, <i>Acinetobacter</i>, <i>Enterococcus</i>, <i>Escherichia-Shigella</i>, <i>Psychrobacter</i>, <i>Streptococcus</i>, <i>Lactococcus</i> and <i>Ligilactobacillus</i>. Microbiome data in environmental samples indicated that the genera in highest relative abundance were <i>Bacillus</i>, <i>Anoxybacillus</i>, <i>Acinetobacter</i> and <i>Psychrobacter</i>. In air samples, the storage room had the highest diversity and in this place <i>Bacillus</i> spp. and <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. were in the majority.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study may provide some useful information to pinpoint the critical contamination sources in the poultry slaughtering process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Veterinary Research\",\"volume\":\"68 3\",\"pages\":\"337-345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424139/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Veterinary Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2024-0051\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2024-0051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言本研究旨在确定家禽屠宰线上不同阶段鸡尸体及其周围环境的细菌多样性:采用 16S rRNA 基因扩增子测序来评估细菌群落多样性在门和属一级的变化。样本收集时间为 2021 年 9 月至 11 月,针对不同操作阶段(去毛后、去内脏后、水冷后和冷却后)的胴体表面,以及这些单元的内部环境和空气。研究在土耳其科尼亚的一家垂直一体化家禽屠宰场进行:结果:由于屠宰阶段的物理效应导致微生物重新分布,冷藏和储藏阶段后微生物多样性增加。贮藏后的最终产品样本中细菌数量最多。这一阶段的细菌数量与其他屠宰阶段的细菌数量以及冷冻水和工作人员手上的细菌数量密切相关。屠宰阶段鸡屠体中常见的菌属有大肠球菌、醋杆菌、肠球菌、志贺氏杆菌、精神杆菌、链球菌、乳球菌和ligilactobacillus。环境样本中的微生物组数据表明,相对含量最高的菌属是芽孢杆菌、无氧芽孢杆菌、产气杆菌和精神杆菌。在空气样本中,储藏室的多样性最高,其中以芽孢杆菌属和葡萄球菌属居多:这项研究可为确定家禽屠宰过程中的关键污染源提供一些有用信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bacterial microbiome diversity along poultry slaughtering lines: insights from chicken carcasses and environmental sources.

Introduction: This study aimed to determine the bacterial diversity of chicken carcasses and their surrounding environment at various stages along a poultry slaughter line.

Material and methods: Amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene was employed to assess the shifts in bacterial community diversity at both phylum and genus levels. Samples were collected from September to November 2021, targeting carcass surfaces at various operational stages (post-defeathering, post-evisceration, post-water chilling, and post-cooling), as well as from the internal environments and air of these units. The study took place in a vertically integrated poultry slaughterhouse in Konya, Turkey.

Results: Microbial diversity increased after the chilling and storage stages as a result of redistribution of the microorganisms after the physical effect of the slaughtering stages. The final product sample taken after storage had the highest bacterial abundance. The abundance at this stage was found to be strongly correlated with that at other slaughtering stages, as well as with the abundance in chilling water and on the personnel's hands. The common genera in chicken carcasses during slaughter stages were Macrococcus, Acinetobacter, Enterococcus, Escherichia-Shigella, Psychrobacter, Streptococcus, Lactococcus and Ligilactobacillus. Microbiome data in environmental samples indicated that the genera in highest relative abundance were Bacillus, Anoxybacillus, Acinetobacter and Psychrobacter. In air samples, the storage room had the highest diversity and in this place Bacillus spp. and Staphylococcus spp. were in the majority.

Conclusion: This study may provide some useful information to pinpoint the critical contamination sources in the poultry slaughtering process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Veterinary Research
Journal of Veterinary Research Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
58
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Veterinary Research (formerly Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy) is a quarterly that publishes original papers, review articles and short communications on bacteriology, virology, parasitology, immunology, molecular biology, pathology, toxicology, pharmacology, and biochemistry. The main emphasis is, however, on infectious diseases of animals, food safety and public health, and clinical sciences.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the role of Dirofilaria repens macrophage migration inhibitory factors in host-parasite interactions. Bacterial microbiome diversity along poultry slaughtering lines: insights from chicken carcasses and environmental sources. Biomarkers of oxidative stress, biochemical changes, and the activity of lysosomal enzymes in the livers of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum) vaccinated against yersiniosis before a Yersinia ruckeri challenge. Effect of chokeberry pomace as a feed additive for high-producing dairy goats on oxidative stress parameters and quality of milk. Effect of the addition of different forms of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) on the quality of vacuum-packed minced pork.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1