人体头皮活体成像技术:文献系统回顾。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1002/lsm.23835
Bobak Hedayati, Luke Horton, Brittany Urso, Chloe Ekelem, Arash Babadjouni, Ajay N. Sharma, Natasha Atanaskova Mesinkovska
{"title":"人体头皮活体成像技术:文献系统回顾。","authors":"Bobak Hedayati,&nbsp;Luke Horton,&nbsp;Brittany Urso,&nbsp;Chloe Ekelem,&nbsp;Arash Babadjouni,&nbsp;Ajay N. Sharma,&nbsp;Natasha Atanaskova Mesinkovska","doi":"10.1002/lsm.23835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Scalp inflammation and alopecia are distressing conditions for which patients regularly present to dermatology. Although some diagnoses can be made clinically, others require biopsy, which carries the risk of pain, infection, bleeding, and scarring. This review examines the existing literature regarding noninvasive in vivo imaging techniques and their evidence and utility in evaluating scalp pathology, with a focus on the diagnostics of hair conditions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic literature search was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines without timeframe restrictions. The PubMed and Clarivate (Web of Science) databases were searched using the terms (“imaging” OR “in-vivo imaging” OR “non-invasive imaging” OR “non-invasive in vivo imaging” “imaging,” “in-vivo imaging) AND (“human scalp disorders” OR “scalp” OR “hair loss” OR “alopecia”). Peer-reviewed randomized control trials (RCTs), prospective studies, retrospective studies, and case series or reports discussing in vivo imaging of the scalp published before 2022 were selected.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-two studies were included and discussed; modalities included laser devices (<i>n</i> = 27), ultrasound (US) (<i>n</i> = 13), infrared thermography (<i>n</i> = 1), skin capacitance imaging (SCI), and ultraviolet light–enhanced visualization (ULEV) (<i>n</i> = 1). The most common laser devices used were reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), multiphoton microscopy (MPM), and optical coherence tomography (OCT). US techniques included high-frequency US (HFUS) and US biomicroscopy (UBM).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Quality imaging of the scalp in the setting of alopecic, neoplastic, and inflammatory diseases is highly sought after. Many of these noninvasive imaging techniques show promise, each with individual advantages and disadvantages in imaging-specific conditions. Ultimately, noninvasive imaging techniques may be used to optimize patient management and minimize morbidity associated with scalp biopsies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17961,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","volume":"56 9","pages":"741-754"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lsm.23835","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Vivo Imaging Techniques for the Human Scalp: A Systematic Review of the Literature\",\"authors\":\"Bobak Hedayati,&nbsp;Luke Horton,&nbsp;Brittany Urso,&nbsp;Chloe Ekelem,&nbsp;Arash Babadjouni,&nbsp;Ajay N. Sharma,&nbsp;Natasha Atanaskova Mesinkovska\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lsm.23835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Scalp inflammation and alopecia are distressing conditions for which patients regularly present to dermatology. Although some diagnoses can be made clinically, others require biopsy, which carries the risk of pain, infection, bleeding, and scarring. This review examines the existing literature regarding noninvasive in vivo imaging techniques and their evidence and utility in evaluating scalp pathology, with a focus on the diagnostics of hair conditions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A systematic literature search was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines without timeframe restrictions. The PubMed and Clarivate (Web of Science) databases were searched using the terms (“imaging” OR “in-vivo imaging” OR “non-invasive imaging” OR “non-invasive in vivo imaging” “imaging,” “in-vivo imaging) AND (“human scalp disorders” OR “scalp” OR “hair loss” OR “alopecia”). Peer-reviewed randomized control trials (RCTs), prospective studies, retrospective studies, and case series or reports discussing in vivo imaging of the scalp published before 2022 were selected.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Forty-two studies were included and discussed; modalities included laser devices (<i>n</i> = 27), ultrasound (US) (<i>n</i> = 13), infrared thermography (<i>n</i> = 1), skin capacitance imaging (SCI), and ultraviolet light–enhanced visualization (ULEV) (<i>n</i> = 1). The most common laser devices used were reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), multiphoton microscopy (MPM), and optical coherence tomography (OCT). US techniques included high-frequency US (HFUS) and US biomicroscopy (UBM).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Quality imaging of the scalp in the setting of alopecic, neoplastic, and inflammatory diseases is highly sought after. Many of these noninvasive imaging techniques show promise, each with individual advantages and disadvantages in imaging-specific conditions. Ultimately, noninvasive imaging techniques may be used to optimize patient management and minimize morbidity associated with scalp biopsies.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"56 9\",\"pages\":\"741-754\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lsm.23835\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lsm.23835\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lsm.23835","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:头皮发炎和脱发是一种令人苦恼的疾病,患者经常因此到皮肤科就诊。虽然有些诊断可以通过临床方式做出,但有些则需要进行活检,而活检会带来疼痛、感染、出血和疤痕的风险。本综述研究了有关无创活体成像技术及其在评估头皮病理方面的证据和效用的现有文献,重点是毛发病症的诊断:采用《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)指南进行了系统性文献检索,没有时间限制。使用术语("成像 "或 "体内成像 "或 "无创成像 "或 "无创体内成像""成像""体内成像")和("人类头皮疾病 "或 "头皮 "或 "脱发 "或 "脱发症")在 PubMed 和 Clarivate(Web of Science)数据库中进行检索。选择了同行评议的随机对照试验(RCT)、前瞻性研究、回顾性研究以及 2022 年之前发表的讨论头皮活体成像的系列病例或报告:共纳入并讨论了 42 项研究;研究方式包括激光设备(n = 27)、超声波(US)(n = 13)、红外热成像(n = 1)、皮肤电容成像(SCI)和紫外线增强可视化(ULEV)(n = 1)。最常用的激光设备是反射共聚焦显微镜(RCM)、多光子显微镜(MPM)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)。US 技术包括高频 US(HFUS)和 US 生物显微镜(UBM):结论:脱发、肿瘤和炎症性疾病患者对头皮成像的质量要求很高。许多无创成像技术都显示出了良好的前景,但在成像特定病症时各有利弊。最终,无创成像技术可用于优化患者管理,最大限度地降低头皮活检的发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In Vivo Imaging Techniques for the Human Scalp: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Objective

Scalp inflammation and alopecia are distressing conditions for which patients regularly present to dermatology. Although some diagnoses can be made clinically, others require biopsy, which carries the risk of pain, infection, bleeding, and scarring. This review examines the existing literature regarding noninvasive in vivo imaging techniques and their evidence and utility in evaluating scalp pathology, with a focus on the diagnostics of hair conditions.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines without timeframe restrictions. The PubMed and Clarivate (Web of Science) databases were searched using the terms (“imaging” OR “in-vivo imaging” OR “non-invasive imaging” OR “non-invasive in vivo imaging” “imaging,” “in-vivo imaging) AND (“human scalp disorders” OR “scalp” OR “hair loss” OR “alopecia”). Peer-reviewed randomized control trials (RCTs), prospective studies, retrospective studies, and case series or reports discussing in vivo imaging of the scalp published before 2022 were selected.

Results

Forty-two studies were included and discussed; modalities included laser devices (n = 27), ultrasound (US) (n = 13), infrared thermography (n = 1), skin capacitance imaging (SCI), and ultraviolet light–enhanced visualization (ULEV) (n = 1). The most common laser devices used were reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), multiphoton microscopy (MPM), and optical coherence tomography (OCT). US techniques included high-frequency US (HFUS) and US biomicroscopy (UBM).

Conclusion

Quality imaging of the scalp in the setting of alopecic, neoplastic, and inflammatory diseases is highly sought after. Many of these noninvasive imaging techniques show promise, each with individual advantages and disadvantages in imaging-specific conditions. Ultimately, noninvasive imaging techniques may be used to optimize patient management and minimize morbidity associated with scalp biopsies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine publishes the highest quality research and clinical manuscripts in areas relating to the use of lasers in medicine and biology. The journal publishes basic and clinical studies on the therapeutic and diagnostic use of lasers in all the surgical and medical specialties. Contributions regarding clinical trials, new therapeutic techniques or instrumentation, laser biophysics and bioengineering, photobiology and photochemistry, outcomes research, cost-effectiveness, and other aspects of biomedicine are welcome. Using a process of rigorous yet rapid review of submitted manuscripts, findings of high scientific and medical interest are published with a minimum delay.
期刊最新文献
Cutaneous Immune Responses to Ablative Fractional Laser, Heat- and Cold-Based Dermatological Procedures. Multiphoton Microscopy Assessment of Healing From Tendon Laceration and Microthermal Coagula in a Rat Model. Differentiation of Tumors of the Upper Respiratory Tract Using Optical Metabolic Imaging. Evaluation of Papain-Urea for Enzymatic Debridement of Coagulation Zones Following Ablative Fractional Laser Treatment. The 595-nm Wavelength Pulsed Dye Laser for Pediatric Port-Wine Birthmarks and Infantile Hemangiomas: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1