从棕榈红藻中提取抗氧化肽的 pH 值依赖性:一种顺序提取法。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Marine Drugs Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.3390/md22090413
Sakhi Ghelichi, Ann-Dorit Moltke Sørensen, Grazielle Náthia-Neves, Charlotte Jacobsen
{"title":"从棕榈红藻中提取抗氧化肽的 pH 值依赖性:一种顺序提取法。","authors":"Sakhi Ghelichi, Ann-Dorit Moltke Sørensen, Grazielle Náthia-Neves, Charlotte Jacobsen","doi":"10.3390/md22090413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study employed a diverse approach to extract antioxidant peptides from red seaweed <i>Palmaria palmata</i>, recognized for its comparatively high protein content. Initially, an aqueous extraction of the entire seaweed was performed, followed by enzymatic hydrolysis of the solid residues prepared from the first step. The effects of three different pH levels (3, 6, and 9) during the aqueous extraction were also examined. Results indicated that the solid fraction from the sequential extraction process contained significantly higher levels of proteins and amino acids than other fractions (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, the solid fractions (IC<sub>50</sub> ranging from 2.29 to 8.15 mg.mL<sup>-1</sup>) demonstrated significantly greater free radical scavengers than the liquid fractions (IC<sub>50</sub> ranging from 9.03 to 10.41 mg.mL<sup>-1</sup> or not obtained at the highest concentration tested) at both stages of extraction (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Among the solid fractions, those produced fractions under alkaline conditions were less effective in radical scavenging than the produced fractions under acidic or neutral conditions. The fractions with most effective metal ion chelating activity were the solid fractions from the enzymatic stage, particularly at pH 3 (IC<sub>50</sub> = 0.63 ± 0.04 mg.mL<sup>-1</sup>) and pH 6 (IC<sub>50</sub> = 0.89 ± 0.07 mg.mL<sup>-1</sup>), which were significantly more effective than those from the initial extraction stage (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Despite no significant difference in the total phenolic content between these solid fractions and their corresponding liquid fractions (3.79 ± 0.05 vs. 3.48 ± 0.02 mg.mL<sup>-1</sup> at pH 3 and 2.43 ± 0.22 vs. 2.51 ± 0.00 mg.mL<sup>-1</sup> at pH 6) (<i>p</i> > 0.05), the observed antioxidant properties may be attributed to bioactive amino acids such as histidine, glutamic acid, aspartic acid, tyrosine, and methionine, either as free amino acids or within proteins and peptides.</p>","PeriodicalId":18222,"journal":{"name":"Marine Drugs","volume":"22 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11433066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"pH-Dependent Extraction of Antioxidant Peptides from Red Seaweed <i>Palmaria palmata</i>: A Sequential Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Sakhi Ghelichi, Ann-Dorit Moltke Sørensen, Grazielle Náthia-Neves, Charlotte Jacobsen\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/md22090413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study employed a diverse approach to extract antioxidant peptides from red seaweed <i>Palmaria palmata</i>, recognized for its comparatively high protein content. Initially, an aqueous extraction of the entire seaweed was performed, followed by enzymatic hydrolysis of the solid residues prepared from the first step. The effects of three different pH levels (3, 6, and 9) during the aqueous extraction were also examined. Results indicated that the solid fraction from the sequential extraction process contained significantly higher levels of proteins and amino acids than other fractions (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, the solid fractions (IC<sub>50</sub> ranging from 2.29 to 8.15 mg.mL<sup>-1</sup>) demonstrated significantly greater free radical scavengers than the liquid fractions (IC<sub>50</sub> ranging from 9.03 to 10.41 mg.mL<sup>-1</sup> or not obtained at the highest concentration tested) at both stages of extraction (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Among the solid fractions, those produced fractions under alkaline conditions were less effective in radical scavenging than the produced fractions under acidic or neutral conditions. The fractions with most effective metal ion chelating activity were the solid fractions from the enzymatic stage, particularly at pH 3 (IC<sub>50</sub> = 0.63 ± 0.04 mg.mL<sup>-1</sup>) and pH 6 (IC<sub>50</sub> = 0.89 ± 0.07 mg.mL<sup>-1</sup>), which were significantly more effective than those from the initial extraction stage (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Despite no significant difference in the total phenolic content between these solid fractions and their corresponding liquid fractions (3.79 ± 0.05 vs. 3.48 ± 0.02 mg.mL<sup>-1</sup> at pH 3 and 2.43 ± 0.22 vs. 2.51 ± 0.00 mg.mL<sup>-1</sup> at pH 6) (<i>p</i> > 0.05), the observed antioxidant properties may be attributed to bioactive amino acids such as histidine, glutamic acid, aspartic acid, tyrosine, and methionine, either as free amino acids or within proteins and peptides.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Drugs\",\"volume\":\"22 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11433066/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/md22090413\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/md22090413","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用多种方法从棕榈红藻中提取抗氧化肽,棕榈红藻的蛋白质含量相对较高。首先对整个海藻进行水提取,然后对第一步提取的固体残留物进行酶水解。此外,还研究了水提取过程中三种不同 pH 值(3、6 和 9)的影响。结果表明,连续萃取过程中的固体馏分所含的蛋白质和氨基酸含量明显高于其他馏分(p < 0.05)。此外,在萃取的两个阶段,固体馏分(IC50 为 2.29 至 8.15 mg.mL-1)的自由基清除能力明显高于液体馏分(IC50 为 9.03 至 10.41 mg.mL-1,或在测试的最高浓度下未获得)(p < 0.05)。在固体馏分中,碱性条件下产生的馏分清除自由基的效果低于酸性或中性条件下产生的馏分。金属离子螯合活性最有效的馏分是酶解阶段产生的固体馏分,尤其是在 pH 3(IC50 = 0.63 ± 0.04 mg.mL-1)和 pH 6(IC50 = 0.89 ± 0.07 mg.mL-1)时,其效果明显高于初始提取阶段产生的馏分(p < 0.05)。尽管这些固体馏分与相应的液体馏分在总酚含量上没有明显差异(pH 3 时为 3.79 ± 0.05 vs. 3.48 ± 0.02 mg.mL-1,pH 6 时为 2.43 ± 0.22 vs. 2.51 ± 0.00 mg.p>0.05),观察到的抗氧化特性可能归因于组氨酸、谷氨酸、天门冬氨酸、酪氨酸和蛋氨酸等生物活性氨基酸,它们可以是游离氨基酸,也可以是蛋白质和肽中的氨基酸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
pH-Dependent Extraction of Antioxidant Peptides from Red Seaweed Palmaria palmata: A Sequential Approach.

This study employed a diverse approach to extract antioxidant peptides from red seaweed Palmaria palmata, recognized for its comparatively high protein content. Initially, an aqueous extraction of the entire seaweed was performed, followed by enzymatic hydrolysis of the solid residues prepared from the first step. The effects of three different pH levels (3, 6, and 9) during the aqueous extraction were also examined. Results indicated that the solid fraction from the sequential extraction process contained significantly higher levels of proteins and amino acids than other fractions (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the solid fractions (IC50 ranging from 2.29 to 8.15 mg.mL-1) demonstrated significantly greater free radical scavengers than the liquid fractions (IC50 ranging from 9.03 to 10.41 mg.mL-1 or not obtained at the highest concentration tested) at both stages of extraction (p < 0.05). Among the solid fractions, those produced fractions under alkaline conditions were less effective in radical scavenging than the produced fractions under acidic or neutral conditions. The fractions with most effective metal ion chelating activity were the solid fractions from the enzymatic stage, particularly at pH 3 (IC50 = 0.63 ± 0.04 mg.mL-1) and pH 6 (IC50 = 0.89 ± 0.07 mg.mL-1), which were significantly more effective than those from the initial extraction stage (p < 0.05). Despite no significant difference in the total phenolic content between these solid fractions and their corresponding liquid fractions (3.79 ± 0.05 vs. 3.48 ± 0.02 mg.mL-1 at pH 3 and 2.43 ± 0.22 vs. 2.51 ± 0.00 mg.mL-1 at pH 6) (p > 0.05), the observed antioxidant properties may be attributed to bioactive amino acids such as histidine, glutamic acid, aspartic acid, tyrosine, and methionine, either as free amino acids or within proteins and peptides.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Drugs
Marine Drugs 医学-医药化学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
671
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Marine Drugs (ISSN 1660-3397) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on the research, development and production of drugs from the sea. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible, particularly synthetic procedures and characterization information for bioactive compounds. There is no restriction on the length of the experimental section.
期刊最新文献
Antioxidative and Anti-Atopic Dermatitis Effects of Peptides Derived from Hydrolyzed Sebastes schlegelii Tail By-Products. Metabolite Profiling of Macroalgae: Biosynthesis and Beneficial Biological Properties of Active Compounds. Characterization of Phytoplankton-Derived Amino Acids and Tracing the Source of Organic Carbon Using Stable Isotopes in the Amundsen Sea. Discovery of Anti-Inflammatory Alkaloids from Sponge Stylissa massa Suggests New Biosynthetic Pathways for Pyrrole-Imidazole Alkaloids. Talaroterpenoids A-F: Six New Seco-Terpenoids from the Marine-Derived Fungus Talaromyces aurantiacus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1