平均值安装和面弓转移对半可调关节器髁状突引导设置的影响--使用数字头侧位图对无牙颌患者进行的比较研究

Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_740_23
M Z Mustafa, G Shetty, Y Deeban, M I Mathar, A M Joseph, S Aldhuwayhi, A A Thakare, K A Al-Hamad, S M Shamsudeen, M S Ayub
{"title":"平均值安装和面弓转移对半可调关节器髁状突引导设置的影响--使用数字头侧位图对无牙颌患者进行的比较研究","authors":"M Z Mustafa, G Shetty, Y Deeban, M I Mathar, A M Joseph, S Aldhuwayhi, A A Thakare, K A Al-Hamad, S M Shamsudeen, M S Ayub","doi":"10.4103/njcp.njcp_740_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While we attempt to restore occlusion in completely edentulous patients there is a consensus among clinicians to articulate the cast using average value and avoid performing facebow transfer. Various studies question the application of facebow transfer in the fabrication of removable complete denture fabrication.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study was therefore aimed to study the effect on condylar guidance with casts mounted by the facebow method, Bonwill's method, and radiographic method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed using casts of edentulous patients attending the Department of Prosthodontics. After establishing a tentative jaw relationship using wax occlusal rims in the edentulous participants, the casts were mounted by Bonwill's method and the facebow transfer method to a semi-adjustable articulator. Protrusive records of the subjects were used to program the articulator to obtain the condylar guidance values. Digital lateral cephalographs were made both in centric and protrusive jaw relationships. The mandibular condyles were then traced and overlapped to obtain radiographic values. The condylar guidance values obtained by Bonwill's method, facebow method and radiographic method were compared using Wilcoxon's signed rank test and Mann-Whitney U test. The SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 21.0. Armonk, NY, USA:IBM Corp.), and, at a probability value of 0.05, the significance of every statistical test was predetermined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten edentulous 45-70 year olds participated in the study. The mean discrepancy between radiography and facebow methods was 12.8° for the right side and 12.7° for the left (P < 0.005). The difference between radiography and Bonwill's methods was significant (P < 0.005), with a mean difference of 34.3° for the right side and 34.7° for the left side. The difference between Bonwill's method and the facebow method was significant (P < 0.005), with a mean difference of 21.5° for the right side and 22° for the left side.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The condylar guidance values obtained by clinical methods (Bonwill's and Facebow) were significantly lesser (P < 0.005) compared to the values obtained by radiographic method.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Average Value Mounting and Facebow Transfer on Condylar Guidance Settings in a Semi-Adjustable Articulator - A Comparative Study using Digital Lateral Cephalographs in Edentulous Patients.\",\"authors\":\"M Z Mustafa, G Shetty, Y Deeban, M I Mathar, A M Joseph, S Aldhuwayhi, A A Thakare, K A Al-Hamad, S M Shamsudeen, M S Ayub\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/njcp.njcp_740_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While we attempt to restore occlusion in completely edentulous patients there is a consensus among clinicians to articulate the cast using average value and avoid performing facebow transfer. Various studies question the application of facebow transfer in the fabrication of removable complete denture fabrication.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study was therefore aimed to study the effect on condylar guidance with casts mounted by the facebow method, Bonwill's method, and radiographic method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed using casts of edentulous patients attending the Department of Prosthodontics. After establishing a tentative jaw relationship using wax occlusal rims in the edentulous participants, the casts were mounted by Bonwill's method and the facebow transfer method to a semi-adjustable articulator. Protrusive records of the subjects were used to program the articulator to obtain the condylar guidance values. Digital lateral cephalographs were made both in centric and protrusive jaw relationships. The mandibular condyles were then traced and overlapped to obtain radiographic values. The condylar guidance values obtained by Bonwill's method, facebow method and radiographic method were compared using Wilcoxon's signed rank test and Mann-Whitney U test. The SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 21.0. Armonk, NY, USA:IBM Corp.), and, at a probability value of 0.05, the significance of every statistical test was predetermined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten edentulous 45-70 year olds participated in the study. The mean discrepancy between radiography and facebow methods was 12.8° for the right side and 12.7° for the left (P < 0.005). The difference between radiography and Bonwill's methods was significant (P < 0.005), with a mean difference of 34.3° for the right side and 34.7° for the left side. The difference between Bonwill's method and the facebow method was significant (P < 0.005), with a mean difference of 21.5° for the right side and 22° for the left side.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The condylar guidance values obtained by clinical methods (Bonwill's and Facebow) were significantly lesser (P < 0.005) compared to the values obtained by radiographic method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_740_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_740_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当我们试图恢复全口无牙患者的咬合时,临床医生的共识是使用平均值衔接石膏,避免进行面弓转移。目的:因此,本研究旨在研究面弓法、Bonwill 法和放射摄影法安装铸模对髁突引导的影响:方法:使用修复科就诊的无牙颌患者的石膏进行横断面研究。在使用蜡咬合边缘为无牙患者建立初步的颌骨关系后,用 Bonwill 法和面弓转移法将铸模安装到半可调关节器上。受试者的前突记录被用于对发音器进行编程,以获得髁突引导值。数字头颅侧位片是在颌骨居中和前突关系下制作的。然后对下颌骨髁状突进行追踪和重叠,以获得放射线数值。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和Mann-Whitney U检验比较了Bonwill方法、面弓方法和放射学方法获得的髁状突引导值。SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 21.0. Armonk, NY, USA:IBM Corp.),在概率值为 0.05 时,每次统计检验的显著性都是预先确定的:结果:10 名 45-70 岁的无牙颌患者参加了研究。放射摄影法和面弓法的平均差异为右侧 12.8°,左侧 12.7°(P < 0.005)。射线照相法和邦威尔法的差异显著(P < 0.005),右侧的平均差异为 34.3°,左侧为 34.7°。Bonwill方法与面弓方法的差异显著(P < 0.005),右侧平均差异为21.5°,左侧平均差异为22°:结论:临床方法(Bonwill's 法和面弓法)获得的髁突引导值明显低于放射学方法获得的值(P < 0.005)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
The Effect of Average Value Mounting and Facebow Transfer on Condylar Guidance Settings in a Semi-Adjustable Articulator - A Comparative Study using Digital Lateral Cephalographs in Edentulous Patients.

Background: While we attempt to restore occlusion in completely edentulous patients there is a consensus among clinicians to articulate the cast using average value and avoid performing facebow transfer. Various studies question the application of facebow transfer in the fabrication of removable complete denture fabrication.

Aim: This study was therefore aimed to study the effect on condylar guidance with casts mounted by the facebow method, Bonwill's method, and radiographic method.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed using casts of edentulous patients attending the Department of Prosthodontics. After establishing a tentative jaw relationship using wax occlusal rims in the edentulous participants, the casts were mounted by Bonwill's method and the facebow transfer method to a semi-adjustable articulator. Protrusive records of the subjects were used to program the articulator to obtain the condylar guidance values. Digital lateral cephalographs were made both in centric and protrusive jaw relationships. The mandibular condyles were then traced and overlapped to obtain radiographic values. The condylar guidance values obtained by Bonwill's method, facebow method and radiographic method were compared using Wilcoxon's signed rank test and Mann-Whitney U test. The SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 21.0. Armonk, NY, USA:IBM Corp.), and, at a probability value of 0.05, the significance of every statistical test was predetermined.

Results: Ten edentulous 45-70 year olds participated in the study. The mean discrepancy between radiography and facebow methods was 12.8° for the right side and 12.7° for the left (P < 0.005). The difference between radiography and Bonwill's methods was significant (P < 0.005), with a mean difference of 34.3° for the right side and 34.7° for the left side. The difference between Bonwill's method and the facebow method was significant (P < 0.005), with a mean difference of 21.5° for the right side and 22° for the left side.

Conclusion: The condylar guidance values obtained by clinical methods (Bonwill's and Facebow) were significantly lesser (P < 0.005) compared to the values obtained by radiographic method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1