人工智能辅助评估X光片中的股骨颈骨折:系统回顾与多层次元分析

IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1111/os.14250
Nikolai Ramadanov, Jonathan Lettner, Robert Hable, Hassan Tarek Hakam, Robert Prill, Dobromir Dimitrov, Roland Becker, Andreas G Schreyer, Mikhail Salzmann
{"title":"人工智能辅助评估X光片中的股骨颈骨折:系统回顾与多层次元分析","authors":"Nikolai Ramadanov, Jonathan Lettner, Robert Hable, Hassan Tarek Hakam, Robert Prill, Dobromir Dimitrov, Roland Becker, Andreas G Schreyer, Mikhail Salzmann","doi":"10.1111/os.14250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a dynamic area of computer science that is constantly expanding its practical benefits in various fields. The aim of this study was to analyze AI-guided radiological assessment of femoral neck fractures by performing a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis of primary studies. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on May 21, 2024 [CRD42024541055]. The updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were strictly followed. A systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid (Med), and Epistemonikos databases was conducted until May 31, 2024. Critical appraisal using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool showed that the overall quality of the included studies was moderate. In addition, publication bias was presented in funnel plots. A frequentist multilevel meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model with inverse variance and restricted maximum likelihood heterogeneity estimator with Hartung-Knapp adjustment. The accuracy between AI-based and human assessment of femoral neck fractures, sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Study heterogeneity was assessed using the Higgins test I<sup>2</sup> (low heterogeneity <25%, moderate heterogeneity: 25%-75%, and high heterogeneity >75%). Finally, 11 studies with a total of 21,163 radiographs were included for meta-analysis. The results of the study quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool are presented in Table 2. The funnel plots indicated a moderate publication bias. The AI showed excellent accuracy in assessment of femoral neck fractures (Accuracy = 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.96; I<sup>2</sup> = 99%; p < 0.01). The AI showed good sensitivity in assessment of femoral neck fractures (Sensitivity = 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.93; I<sup>2</sup> = 98%; p < 0.01). The AI showed excellent specificity in assessment of femoral neck fractures (Specificity = 0.91, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.97; I<sup>2</sup> = 97%; p < 0.01). AI-guided radiological assessment of femoral neck fractures showed excellent accuracy and specificity as well as good sensitivity. The use of AI as a faster and more reliable assessment tool and as an aid in radiological routine seems justified.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence-Guided Assessment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Radiographs: A Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nikolai Ramadanov, Jonathan Lettner, Robert Hable, Hassan Tarek Hakam, Robert Prill, Dobromir Dimitrov, Roland Becker, Andreas G Schreyer, Mikhail Salzmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/os.14250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a dynamic area of computer science that is constantly expanding its practical benefits in various fields. The aim of this study was to analyze AI-guided radiological assessment of femoral neck fractures by performing a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis of primary studies. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on May 21, 2024 [CRD42024541055]. The updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were strictly followed. A systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid (Med), and Epistemonikos databases was conducted until May 31, 2024. Critical appraisal using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool showed that the overall quality of the included studies was moderate. In addition, publication bias was presented in funnel plots. A frequentist multilevel meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model with inverse variance and restricted maximum likelihood heterogeneity estimator with Hartung-Knapp adjustment. The accuracy between AI-based and human assessment of femoral neck fractures, sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Study heterogeneity was assessed using the Higgins test I<sup>2</sup> (low heterogeneity <25%, moderate heterogeneity: 25%-75%, and high heterogeneity >75%). Finally, 11 studies with a total of 21,163 radiographs were included for meta-analysis. The results of the study quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool are presented in Table 2. The funnel plots indicated a moderate publication bias. The AI showed excellent accuracy in assessment of femoral neck fractures (Accuracy = 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.96; I<sup>2</sup> = 99%; p < 0.01). The AI showed good sensitivity in assessment of femoral neck fractures (Sensitivity = 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.93; I<sup>2</sup> = 98%; p < 0.01). The AI showed excellent specificity in assessment of femoral neck fractures (Specificity = 0.91, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.97; I<sup>2</sup> = 97%; p < 0.01). AI-guided radiological assessment of femoral neck fractures showed excellent accuracy and specificity as well as good sensitivity. The use of AI as a faster and more reliable assessment tool and as an aid in radiological routine seems justified.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14250\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14250","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)是计算机科学中一个充满活力的领域,它在各个领域的实用性不断扩大。本研究旨在通过对主要研究进行系统综述和多层次荟萃分析,分析人工智能引导下的股骨颈骨折放射学评估。研究方案于2024年5月21日在国际系统综述前瞻性注册中心(PROSPERO)注册[CRD42024541055]。研究严格遵守最新的系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。对PubMed、Web of Science、Ovid (Med)和Epistemonikos数据库进行了系统性文献检索,直至2024年5月31日。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2(QUADAS-2)工具进行的严格评估显示,纳入研究的总体质量为中等。此外,漏斗图还显示了发表偏倚。我们使用带有反方差的随机效应模型和带有 Hartung-Knapp 调整的受限最大似然异质性估计器进行了频数主义多层次荟萃分析。计算了人工智能和人工评估股骨颈骨折的准确性、灵敏度和特异性以及 95% 的置信区间 (CI)。使用希金斯检验 I2 评估了研究的异质性(低异质性为 75%)。最后,荟萃分析纳入了 11 项研究,共 21,163 张射线照片。表 2 列出了使用 QUADAS-2 工具进行的研究质量评估结果。漏斗图显示存在中度发表偏倚。人工智能在评估股骨颈骨折方面显示出极佳的准确性(准确性 = 0.91,95% CI 0.83 至 0.96;I2 = 99%;P 2 = 98%;P 2 = 97%;P 2 = 98%;P 2 = 97%;P 2 = 98%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial Intelligence-Guided Assessment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Radiographs: A Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a dynamic area of computer science that is constantly expanding its practical benefits in various fields. The aim of this study was to analyze AI-guided radiological assessment of femoral neck fractures by performing a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis of primary studies. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on May 21, 2024 [CRD42024541055]. The updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were strictly followed. A systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid (Med), and Epistemonikos databases was conducted until May 31, 2024. Critical appraisal using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool showed that the overall quality of the included studies was moderate. In addition, publication bias was presented in funnel plots. A frequentist multilevel meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model with inverse variance and restricted maximum likelihood heterogeneity estimator with Hartung-Knapp adjustment. The accuracy between AI-based and human assessment of femoral neck fractures, sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Study heterogeneity was assessed using the Higgins test I2 (low heterogeneity <25%, moderate heterogeneity: 25%-75%, and high heterogeneity >75%). Finally, 11 studies with a total of 21,163 radiographs were included for meta-analysis. The results of the study quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool are presented in Table 2. The funnel plots indicated a moderate publication bias. The AI showed excellent accuracy in assessment of femoral neck fractures (Accuracy = 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.96; I2 = 99%; p < 0.01). The AI showed good sensitivity in assessment of femoral neck fractures (Sensitivity = 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.93; I2 = 98%; p < 0.01). The AI showed excellent specificity in assessment of femoral neck fractures (Specificity = 0.91, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.97; I2 = 97%; p < 0.01). AI-guided radiological assessment of femoral neck fractures showed excellent accuracy and specificity as well as good sensitivity. The use of AI as a faster and more reliable assessment tool and as an aid in radiological routine seems justified.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
期刊最新文献
Arthroscopic Management of Juxta-Articular Proximal Tibial Chondroblastoma: A Case Report and Literature Review. HyProCure for Flatfoot Deformity: A Clinical Characteristics Analysis in China. Incidence and Risk Factors of Infection After Fracture Fixation: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Novel MRI Signs in Atlantodental Space Predict Reduction Degree of Atlantoaxial Dislocation. Portable Gait Analysis of Patients With Rotating Hinge Knee Megaprosthesis Compared With Total Knee Arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1