Juri Fuchs, Lucas Rabaux-Eygasier, Fabian Ruping, Markus Kessler, Patrick Günther, Katrin Hoffmann, Zoltan Czigany, Christoph Michalski, Geraldine Hery, Arianeb Mehrabi, Sophie Branchereau
{"title":"重新评估肝切除术作为局部晚期肝母细胞瘤移植手术的替代方案:系统性综述和患者个体数据汇总分析。","authors":"Juri Fuchs, Lucas Rabaux-Eygasier, Fabian Ruping, Markus Kessler, Patrick Günther, Katrin Hoffmann, Zoltan Czigany, Christoph Michalski, Geraldine Hery, Arianeb Mehrabi, Sophie Branchereau","doi":"10.1002/pbc.31339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There is ongoing debate regarding liver transplantation (LT) versus liver resection (LR) for locally advanced hepatoblastoma. However, comparative studies are lacking. Consequently, a significant evidence gap persists, hindering the establishment of consensus guidelines. This study aimed to compare LT and LR for locally advanced hepatoblastoma, using predefined inclusion criteria to ensure comparable intervention groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>According to current Children's Oncology Group (COG) and SIOPEL (European Childhood Liver Tumour Study Group) recommendations, hepatoblastoma that requires LT evaluation was defined as either PRETEXT (PRE-Treatment EXTent of tumor) IV F+, POST-TEXT (POST-Treatment EXTent of tumor) IV, POST-TEXT P+, and/or POST-TEXT V+. A systematic literature search (Medline/Web-of-Science/Embase) was performed. Only patients who met the aforementioned criteria were included. Patient data were extracted individually and pooled.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 189 patients with locally advanced hepatoblastoma from 55 studies met the specified criteria, with 111 undergoing LT and 78 LR. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and PRETEXT stages. Local recurrence was more common after LR (14% vs. 3% in LT, <i>p</i> = .008), while distant recurrence was more often observed after LT (16% vs. 5% in LR, <i>p</i> = .035). Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) did not differ significantly between LT and LR (5-year OS: LT = 75.3% [95% confidence interval: 66.5–85.2], LR = 87.6% [80.4–95.6], <i>p </i>= .140; 5-year EFS: LT = 68.5% [59.3–79.1], LR = 71.1% [60.7–83.3], <i>p </i>= .700).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Real-life data revealed that a considerable number of patients with locally advanced hepatoblastoma underwent LR. This analysis suggests that outcomes are similar and favorable for both approaches. LR can therefore be considered an effective alternative to LT in selected cases even in locally advanced hepatoblastoma.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":19822,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Blood & Cancer","volume":"71 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/pbc.31339","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reappraisal of liver resection as an alternative to transplantation in locally advanced hepatoblastoma: A systematic review and analysis of pooled individual patient data\",\"authors\":\"Juri Fuchs, Lucas Rabaux-Eygasier, Fabian Ruping, Markus Kessler, Patrick Günther, Katrin Hoffmann, Zoltan Czigany, Christoph Michalski, Geraldine Hery, Arianeb Mehrabi, Sophie Branchereau\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pbc.31339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is ongoing debate regarding liver transplantation (LT) versus liver resection (LR) for locally advanced hepatoblastoma. However, comparative studies are lacking. Consequently, a significant evidence gap persists, hindering the establishment of consensus guidelines. This study aimed to compare LT and LR for locally advanced hepatoblastoma, using predefined inclusion criteria to ensure comparable intervention groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>According to current Children's Oncology Group (COG) and SIOPEL (European Childhood Liver Tumour Study Group) recommendations, hepatoblastoma that requires LT evaluation was defined as either PRETEXT (PRE-Treatment EXTent of tumor) IV F+, POST-TEXT (POST-Treatment EXTent of tumor) IV, POST-TEXT P+, and/or POST-TEXT V+. A systematic literature search (Medline/Web-of-Science/Embase) was performed. Only patients who met the aforementioned criteria were included. Patient data were extracted individually and pooled.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 189 patients with locally advanced hepatoblastoma from 55 studies met the specified criteria, with 111 undergoing LT and 78 LR. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and PRETEXT stages. Local recurrence was more common after LR (14% vs. 3% in LT, <i>p</i> = .008), while distant recurrence was more often observed after LT (16% vs. 5% in LR, <i>p</i> = .035). Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) did not differ significantly between LT and LR (5-year OS: LT = 75.3% [95% confidence interval: 66.5–85.2], LR = 87.6% [80.4–95.6], <i>p </i>= .140; 5-year EFS: LT = 68.5% [59.3–79.1], LR = 71.1% [60.7–83.3], <i>p </i>= .700).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Real-life data revealed that a considerable number of patients with locally advanced hepatoblastoma underwent LR. This analysis suggests that outcomes are similar and favorable for both approaches. LR can therefore be considered an effective alternative to LT in selected cases even in locally advanced hepatoblastoma.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Blood & Cancer\",\"volume\":\"71 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/pbc.31339\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Blood & Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pbc.31339\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Blood & Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pbc.31339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reappraisal of liver resection as an alternative to transplantation in locally advanced hepatoblastoma: A systematic review and analysis of pooled individual patient data
Background
There is ongoing debate regarding liver transplantation (LT) versus liver resection (LR) for locally advanced hepatoblastoma. However, comparative studies are lacking. Consequently, a significant evidence gap persists, hindering the establishment of consensus guidelines. This study aimed to compare LT and LR for locally advanced hepatoblastoma, using predefined inclusion criteria to ensure comparable intervention groups.
Methods
According to current Children's Oncology Group (COG) and SIOPEL (European Childhood Liver Tumour Study Group) recommendations, hepatoblastoma that requires LT evaluation was defined as either PRETEXT (PRE-Treatment EXTent of tumor) IV F+, POST-TEXT (POST-Treatment EXTent of tumor) IV, POST-TEXT P+, and/or POST-TEXT V+. A systematic literature search (Medline/Web-of-Science/Embase) was performed. Only patients who met the aforementioned criteria were included. Patient data were extracted individually and pooled.
Results
A total of 189 patients with locally advanced hepatoblastoma from 55 studies met the specified criteria, with 111 undergoing LT and 78 LR. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and PRETEXT stages. Local recurrence was more common after LR (14% vs. 3% in LT, p = .008), while distant recurrence was more often observed after LT (16% vs. 5% in LR, p = .035). Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) did not differ significantly between LT and LR (5-year OS: LT = 75.3% [95% confidence interval: 66.5–85.2], LR = 87.6% [80.4–95.6], p = .140; 5-year EFS: LT = 68.5% [59.3–79.1], LR = 71.1% [60.7–83.3], p = .700).
Conclusion
Real-life data revealed that a considerable number of patients with locally advanced hepatoblastoma underwent LR. This analysis suggests that outcomes are similar and favorable for both approaches. LR can therefore be considered an effective alternative to LT in selected cases even in locally advanced hepatoblastoma.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Blood & Cancer publishes the highest quality manuscripts describing basic and clinical investigations of blood disorders and malignant diseases of childhood including diagnosis, treatment, epidemiology, etiology, biology, and molecular and clinical genetics of these diseases as they affect children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatric Blood & Cancer will also include studies on such treatment options as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, immunology, and gene therapy.