[囚犯的社会问题解决和自杀倾向]。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Orvosi hetilap Pub Date : 2024-09-29 DOI:10.1556/650.2024.33133
Irina Horváthné Pató, Szilvia Kresznerits, Boglárka Erdélyi-Belle, Tamás Szekeres, Dóra Perczel-Forintos
{"title":"[囚犯的社会问题解决和自杀倾向]。","authors":"Irina Horváthné Pató, Szilvia Kresznerits, Boglárka Erdélyi-Belle, Tamás Szekeres, Dóra Perczel-Forintos","doi":"10.1556/650.2024.33133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction: Based on international studies, the risk of suicidality is higher in prisons than in the general population, which can have serious consequences for both the individuals concerned and the prison community. Low levels of problem-solving skills had been shown as a major risk factor for suicidal behaviour, along with depression and hopelessness. Objective: The aim of our study is to assess the social problem-solving skills by the Means End Problem Solving Inventory in a sample of incarcerated people as well as to examine the association of these skills with suicide risk factors in order to establish future intervention possibilities. Method: In our multicentre cross-sectional questionnaire study, we recruited prisoners (n = 363) from four prisons and, for comparison, we recruited volunteers (n = 234) from the general population by online convenience sampling. For comparative studies, we created a matched sample by gender and age (nprisoner = 174, ncontrol = 174). An independent samples t-test was used for the comparative analysis, and Cohen’s d-test was used to measure the effect size of differences. Pearson’s correlation was used to test the association of problem-solving skills with suicidal risk variables (suicidal ideation, depression, hopelessness, perceived stress, impulsivity, subjective well-being). Tests applied: Means End Problem Solving Test; Hopelessness Scale – short version; Paykel Suicide Scale; Beck Depression Inventory – short version; Perceived Stress Scale; Abbreviated Barratt Impulsivity Scale; WHO Well-Being Index-5 item – Hungarian version. Results: The prison sample has significantly worse mental health indicators of suicide risk than the matched control group. The findings show that the prison population has more serious level of depression, more intense suicidal ideation, higher level of perceived stress and impulsivity as well as lower level of social problem-solving skills and psychological well-being. There was no significant relationship between the frequency of suicidal ideation and the level of problem-solving skills neither on the matched sample (n = 174), nor on the full incarcerated sample (n = 363). However, the frequency of suicide thoughts, hopelessness, depression, the level of perceived stress and impulsivity showed moderately positive significant relationship on the full incarcerated sample. Conclusion: Based on our results, it seems that in order to reduce suicide vulnerability, hopelessness, perceived stress and impulsivity among incarcerated people mindfulness interventions might be more effective than problem-solving training. Orv Hetil. 2024; 165(39): 1529–1538.</p>","PeriodicalId":19911,"journal":{"name":"Orvosi hetilap","volume":"165 39","pages":"1529-1538"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Social problem-solving and suicidality in prisoners].\",\"authors\":\"Irina Horváthné Pató, Szilvia Kresznerits, Boglárka Erdélyi-Belle, Tamás Szekeres, Dóra Perczel-Forintos\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/650.2024.33133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction: Based on international studies, the risk of suicidality is higher in prisons than in the general population, which can have serious consequences for both the individuals concerned and the prison community. Low levels of problem-solving skills had been shown as a major risk factor for suicidal behaviour, along with depression and hopelessness. Objective: The aim of our study is to assess the social problem-solving skills by the Means End Problem Solving Inventory in a sample of incarcerated people as well as to examine the association of these skills with suicide risk factors in order to establish future intervention possibilities. Method: In our multicentre cross-sectional questionnaire study, we recruited prisoners (n = 363) from four prisons and, for comparison, we recruited volunteers (n = 234) from the general population by online convenience sampling. For comparative studies, we created a matched sample by gender and age (nprisoner = 174, ncontrol = 174). An independent samples t-test was used for the comparative analysis, and Cohen’s d-test was used to measure the effect size of differences. Pearson’s correlation was used to test the association of problem-solving skills with suicidal risk variables (suicidal ideation, depression, hopelessness, perceived stress, impulsivity, subjective well-being). Tests applied: Means End Problem Solving Test; Hopelessness Scale – short version; Paykel Suicide Scale; Beck Depression Inventory – short version; Perceived Stress Scale; Abbreviated Barratt Impulsivity Scale; WHO Well-Being Index-5 item – Hungarian version. Results: The prison sample has significantly worse mental health indicators of suicide risk than the matched control group. The findings show that the prison population has more serious level of depression, more intense suicidal ideation, higher level of perceived stress and impulsivity as well as lower level of social problem-solving skills and psychological well-being. There was no significant relationship between the frequency of suicidal ideation and the level of problem-solving skills neither on the matched sample (n = 174), nor on the full incarcerated sample (n = 363). However, the frequency of suicide thoughts, hopelessness, depression, the level of perceived stress and impulsivity showed moderately positive significant relationship on the full incarcerated sample. Conclusion: Based on our results, it seems that in order to reduce suicide vulnerability, hopelessness, perceived stress and impulsivity among incarcerated people mindfulness interventions might be more effective than problem-solving training. Orv Hetil. 2024; 165(39): 1529–1538.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orvosi hetilap\",\"volume\":\"165 39\",\"pages\":\"1529-1538\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orvosi hetilap\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2024.33133\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orvosi hetilap","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2024.33133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:根据国际研究,监狱中的自杀风险高于一般人群,这可能对有关个人和监狱社区造成严重后果。低水平的问题解决能力已被证明是自杀行为的主要风险因素,此外还有抑郁和绝望。目的:本研究的目的是通过手段-目的-问题解决量表评估被监禁人员的社会问题解决能力,并研究这些技能与自杀风险因素的关系,以建立未来干预的可能性。方法:在我们的多中心横断面问卷研究中,我们从四个监狱中招募了363名囚犯,并通过在线方便抽样的方式从一般人群中招募了234名志愿者进行比较。为了进行比较研究,我们按性别和年龄创建了一个匹配的样本(nprisoner = 174, ncontrol = 174)。比较分析采用独立样本t检验,差异效应量采用Cohen’s d检验。Pearson’s相关性被用来测试问题解决能力与自杀风险变量(自杀意念、抑郁、绝望、感知压力、冲动、主观幸福感)之间的关系。适用的测试:方法和问题解决测试;绝望量表-简短版本;佩克尔自杀量表;贝克抑郁量表-短版本;感知压力量表;简易Barratt冲动性量表;世卫组织幸福指数5项目-匈牙利版。结果:监狱样本的自杀风险心理健康指标明显低于匹配对照组。研究结果表明,监狱人口的抑郁程度更严重,自杀意念更强烈,感知压力和冲动水平更高,社会问题解决能力和心理健康水平较低。在匹配的样本(n = 174)和完全监禁的样本(n = 363)中,自杀意念的频率和解决问题的技能水平之间没有显著的关系。然而,自杀念头、绝望、抑郁、感知压力和冲动的频率在全监禁样本中呈中等正相关。结论:基于我们的研究结果,为了减少被监禁者的自杀脆弱性、绝望感、感知压力和冲动性,正念干预可能比问题解决训练更有效。奥夫·海泰尔。2024;165(39): 1529 - 1538。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Social problem-solving and suicidality in prisoners].

Introduction: Based on international studies, the risk of suicidality is higher in prisons than in the general population, which can have serious consequences for both the individuals concerned and the prison community. Low levels of problem-solving skills had been shown as a major risk factor for suicidal behaviour, along with depression and hopelessness. Objective: The aim of our study is to assess the social problem-solving skills by the Means End Problem Solving Inventory in a sample of incarcerated people as well as to examine the association of these skills with suicide risk factors in order to establish future intervention possibilities. Method: In our multicentre cross-sectional questionnaire study, we recruited prisoners (n = 363) from four prisons and, for comparison, we recruited volunteers (n = 234) from the general population by online convenience sampling. For comparative studies, we created a matched sample by gender and age (nprisoner = 174, ncontrol = 174). An independent samples t-test was used for the comparative analysis, and Cohen’s d-test was used to measure the effect size of differences. Pearson’s correlation was used to test the association of problem-solving skills with suicidal risk variables (suicidal ideation, depression, hopelessness, perceived stress, impulsivity, subjective well-being). Tests applied: Means End Problem Solving Test; Hopelessness Scale – short version; Paykel Suicide Scale; Beck Depression Inventory – short version; Perceived Stress Scale; Abbreviated Barratt Impulsivity Scale; WHO Well-Being Index-5 item – Hungarian version. Results: The prison sample has significantly worse mental health indicators of suicide risk than the matched control group. The findings show that the prison population has more serious level of depression, more intense suicidal ideation, higher level of perceived stress and impulsivity as well as lower level of social problem-solving skills and psychological well-being. There was no significant relationship between the frequency of suicidal ideation and the level of problem-solving skills neither on the matched sample (n = 174), nor on the full incarcerated sample (n = 363). However, the frequency of suicide thoughts, hopelessness, depression, the level of perceived stress and impulsivity showed moderately positive significant relationship on the full incarcerated sample. Conclusion: Based on our results, it seems that in order to reduce suicide vulnerability, hopelessness, perceived stress and impulsivity among incarcerated people mindfulness interventions might be more effective than problem-solving training. Orv Hetil. 2024; 165(39): 1529–1538.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orvosi hetilap
Orvosi hetilap MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
274
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original and review papers in the fields of experimental and clinical medicine. It covers epidemiology, diagnostics, therapy and the prevention of human diseases as well as papers of medical history. Orvosi Hetilap is the oldest, still in-print, Hungarian publication and also the one-and-only weekly published scientific journal in Hungary. The strategy of the journal is based on the Curatorium of the Lajos Markusovszky Foundation and on the National and International Editorial Board. The 150 year-old journal is part of the Hungarian Cultural Heritage.
期刊最新文献
[Comparative reliability of transcutaneous bilirubinometers in full-term newborn infants]. [Book reviews]. [The role of attachment in healthy ageing]. [Ferenc Markhot and the history of the medical faculty in Eger, parallel with the University of Nagyszombat]. [Dental sociology as the background and validation framework of childhood oral health promotion programs].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1