抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的静脉内地塞米松植入--瑞士队列研究。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Pharmaceuticals Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.3390/ph17091235
Ferhat Turgut, Gábor M Somfai, Christoph Tappeiner, Katja Hatz, Irmela Mantel, Aude Ambresin, Guy Donati, Viviane Guignard, Dana Nagyová, Isabel B Pfister, Christine Schild, Justus G Garweg
{"title":"抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的静脉内地塞米松植入--瑞士队列研究。","authors":"Ferhat Turgut, Gábor M Somfai, Christoph Tappeiner, Katja Hatz, Irmela Mantel, Aude Ambresin, Guy Donati, Viviane Guignard, Dana Nagyová, Isabel B Pfister, Christine Schild, Justus G Garweg","doi":"10.3390/ph17091235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a significant cause of visual impairment, often treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. However, some patients do not respond adequately to this treatment. This study aims to evaluate the contribution of the intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant as a second-line treatment in DME patients with insufficient response to anti-VEGF therapy or with high treatment burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted across seven clinical sites in Switzerland. The study included eyes with active DME that had been pretreated with anti-VEGF for at least six months before receiving DEX therapy. Data were extracted from electronic patient records, focusing on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and injection frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 95 eyes from 89 patients (38.8% females, mean age 65.6 ± 9.1 years, follow-up time 80.6 ± 38.5 [13.5-166.7] months) were analyzed. Prior to the first DEX implant, eyes had undergone an average of 16.0 ± 13.3 anti-VEGF injections over 32.5 ± 22.4 months. Post-DEX treatment, 22.1% of eyes received DEX monotherapy, 44.2% received a combination of DEX and anti-VEGF, 25.3% continued with anti-VEGF monotherapy, and 8.4% received no further treatment. The number of anti-VEGF injections decreased significantly from 6.4 ± 3.1 in the year before DEX to 1.6 ± 2.4 in the year after DEX (<i>p</i> < 0.001). BCVA remained stable (0.4 ± 0.3 logMAR at baseline, 0.4 ± 0.5 logMAR at 24 months, <i>p</i> = 0.2), while CST improved from 477.7 ± 141.0 to 320.4 ± 125.5 μm (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and the presence of retinal fluid decreased from 98.0% to 61.1% (<i>p</i> = 0.021). During follow-up, 26.3% of eyes required glaucoma medication, 4.2% underwent glaucoma surgery, and 1.1% needed cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In real-world clinical settings, the addition of DEX to anti-VEGF therapy in DME patients significantly reduces treatment burden and retinal fluid while maintaining visual function. Treatment decisions should balance anatomical and functional outcomes, considering individual patient needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20198,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11434786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant in Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Pretreated Diabetic Macular Edema-A Swiss Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ferhat Turgut, Gábor M Somfai, Christoph Tappeiner, Katja Hatz, Irmela Mantel, Aude Ambresin, Guy Donati, Viviane Guignard, Dana Nagyová, Isabel B Pfister, Christine Schild, Justus G Garweg\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ph17091235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a significant cause of visual impairment, often treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. However, some patients do not respond adequately to this treatment. This study aims to evaluate the contribution of the intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant as a second-line treatment in DME patients with insufficient response to anti-VEGF therapy or with high treatment burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted across seven clinical sites in Switzerland. The study included eyes with active DME that had been pretreated with anti-VEGF for at least six months before receiving DEX therapy. Data were extracted from electronic patient records, focusing on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and injection frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 95 eyes from 89 patients (38.8% females, mean age 65.6 ± 9.1 years, follow-up time 80.6 ± 38.5 [13.5-166.7] months) were analyzed. Prior to the first DEX implant, eyes had undergone an average of 16.0 ± 13.3 anti-VEGF injections over 32.5 ± 22.4 months. Post-DEX treatment, 22.1% of eyes received DEX monotherapy, 44.2% received a combination of DEX and anti-VEGF, 25.3% continued with anti-VEGF monotherapy, and 8.4% received no further treatment. The number of anti-VEGF injections decreased significantly from 6.4 ± 3.1 in the year before DEX to 1.6 ± 2.4 in the year after DEX (<i>p</i> < 0.001). BCVA remained stable (0.4 ± 0.3 logMAR at baseline, 0.4 ± 0.5 logMAR at 24 months, <i>p</i> = 0.2), while CST improved from 477.7 ± 141.0 to 320.4 ± 125.5 μm (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and the presence of retinal fluid decreased from 98.0% to 61.1% (<i>p</i> = 0.021). During follow-up, 26.3% of eyes required glaucoma medication, 4.2% underwent glaucoma surgery, and 1.1% needed cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In real-world clinical settings, the addition of DEX to anti-VEGF therapy in DME patients significantly reduces treatment burden and retinal fluid while maintaining visual function. Treatment decisions should balance anatomical and functional outcomes, considering individual patient needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceuticals\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11434786/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceuticals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17091235\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17091235","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)是视力损伤的重要原因,通常采用抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)药物治疗。然而,有些患者对这种治疗方法反应不佳。本研究旨在评估在抗血管内皮生长因子治疗无效或治疗负担较重的 DME 患者中,作为二线治疗手段的玻璃体内植入地塞米松(DEX)的作用:这项回顾性多中心队列研究在瑞士的七个临床机构进行。研究对象包括接受 DEX 治疗前已接受抗血管内皮生长因子治疗至少 6 个月的活动性 DME 患者。研究人员从电子病历中提取数据,重点关注最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、中央子场厚度(CST)和注射频率:共分析了 89 位患者的 95 只眼睛(38.8% 为女性,平均年龄为 65.6 ± 9.1 岁,随访时间为 80.6 ± 38.5 [13.5-166.7] 个月)。在首次植入 DEX 之前,患者平均接受了 16.0 ± 13.3 次抗血管内皮生长因子注射,时间为 32.5 ± 22.4 个月。DEX治疗后,22.1%的眼睛接受了DEX单药治疗,44.2%的眼睛接受了DEX和抗血管内皮生长因子联合治疗,25.3%的眼睛继续接受抗血管内皮生长因子单药治疗,8.4%的眼睛没有接受进一步治疗。抗血管内皮生长因子注射次数从DEX治疗前一年的6.4 ± 3.1次大幅减少到DEX治疗后一年的1.6 ± 2.4次(p < 0.001)。BCVA 保持稳定(基线时为 0.4 ± 0.3 logMAR,24 个月时为 0.4 ± 0.5 logMAR,p = 0.2),CST 从 477.7 ± 141.0 μm 下降到 320.4 ± 125.5 μm(p < 0.001),视网膜积液从 98.0% 下降到 61.1% (p = 0.021)。随访期间,26.3%的眼睛需要服用青光眼药物,4.2%的眼睛接受了青光眼手术,1.1%的眼睛需要接受白内障手术:结论:在真实世界的临床环境中,DME 患者在抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的基础上加用 DEX 可显著减轻治疗负担,减少视网膜积液,同时保持视觉功能。治疗决策应兼顾解剖和功能结果,并考虑患者的个体需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant in Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Pretreated Diabetic Macular Edema-A Swiss Cohort Study.

Background/objectives: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a significant cause of visual impairment, often treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. However, some patients do not respond adequately to this treatment. This study aims to evaluate the contribution of the intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant as a second-line treatment in DME patients with insufficient response to anti-VEGF therapy or with high treatment burden.

Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted across seven clinical sites in Switzerland. The study included eyes with active DME that had been pretreated with anti-VEGF for at least six months before receiving DEX therapy. Data were extracted from electronic patient records, focusing on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and injection frequency.

Results: A total of 95 eyes from 89 patients (38.8% females, mean age 65.6 ± 9.1 years, follow-up time 80.6 ± 38.5 [13.5-166.7] months) were analyzed. Prior to the first DEX implant, eyes had undergone an average of 16.0 ± 13.3 anti-VEGF injections over 32.5 ± 22.4 months. Post-DEX treatment, 22.1% of eyes received DEX monotherapy, 44.2% received a combination of DEX and anti-VEGF, 25.3% continued with anti-VEGF monotherapy, and 8.4% received no further treatment. The number of anti-VEGF injections decreased significantly from 6.4 ± 3.1 in the year before DEX to 1.6 ± 2.4 in the year after DEX (p < 0.001). BCVA remained stable (0.4 ± 0.3 logMAR at baseline, 0.4 ± 0.5 logMAR at 24 months, p = 0.2), while CST improved from 477.7 ± 141.0 to 320.4 ± 125.5 μm (p < 0.001), and the presence of retinal fluid decreased from 98.0% to 61.1% (p = 0.021). During follow-up, 26.3% of eyes required glaucoma medication, 4.2% underwent glaucoma surgery, and 1.1% needed cataract surgery.

Conclusions: In real-world clinical settings, the addition of DEX to anti-VEGF therapy in DME patients significantly reduces treatment burden and retinal fluid while maintaining visual function. Treatment decisions should balance anatomical and functional outcomes, considering individual patient needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceuticals
Pharmaceuticals Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
1332
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceuticals (ISSN 1424-8247) is an international scientific journal of medicinal chemistry and related drug sciences.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Cardiovascular Target Attainment in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Tertiary Diabetes Center in Romania. Cancer Metastases to the Liver: Mechanisms of Tumor Cell Colonization. Comparative Assessment of Beeswax Alcohol and Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) to Prevent Liver Aging, Organ Damage, and Oxidative Stress in Hyperlipidemic Zebrafish Exposed to D-Galactose: A 12-Week Dietary Intervention. The Anti-Vitiligo Effects of Feshurin In Vitro from Ferula samarcandica and the Mechanism of Action. Real-Time Fluorescence Monitoring System for Optimal Light Dosage in Cancer Photoimmunotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1