未被发现的美国士兵自杀企图:评估军人风险和复原力的陆军研究(陆军 STARRS)结果。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychological Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1017/S0033291724001028
James A Naifeh, Robert J Ursano, Rachel Shor, Holly B Herberman Mash, Pablo A Aliaga, Carol S Fullerton, Matthew K Nock, Tzu-Cheg Kao, Nancy A Sampson, Ronald C Kessler, Murray B Stein
{"title":"未被发现的美国士兵自杀企图:评估军人风险和复原力的陆军研究(陆军 STARRS)结果。","authors":"James A Naifeh, Robert J Ursano, Rachel Shor, Holly B Herberman Mash, Pablo A Aliaga, Carol S Fullerton, Matthew K Nock, Tzu-Cheg Kao, Nancy A Sampson, Ronald C Kessler, Murray B Stein","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724001028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While previous studies have reported high rates of documented suicide attempts (SAs) in the U.S. Army, the extent to which soldiers make SAs that are not identified in the healthcare system is unknown. Understanding undetected suicidal behavior is important in broadening prevention and intervention efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Representative survey of U.S. Regular Army enlisted soldiers (<i>n</i> = 24 475). Reported SAs during service were compared with SAs documented in administrative medical records. Logistic regression analyses examined sociodemographic characteristics differentiating soldiers with an undetected SA v. documented SA. Among those with an undetected SA, chi-square tests examined characteristics associated with receiving a mental health diagnosis (MH-Dx) prior to SA. Discrete-time survival analysis estimated risk of undetected SA by time in service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prevalence of undetected SA (unweighted <i>n</i> = 259) was 1.3%. Annual incidence was 255.6 per 100 000 soldiers, suggesting one in three SAs are undetected. In multivariable analysis, rank ⩾E5 (OR = 3.1[95%CI 1.6-5.7]) was associated with increased odds of undetected v. documented SA. Females were more likely to have a MH-Dx prior to their undetected SA (Rao-Scott <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup><sub>1</sub> = 6.1, <i>p</i> = .01). Over one-fifth of undetected SAs resulted in at least moderate injury. Risk of undetected SA was greater during the first four years of service.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that substantially more soldiers make SAs than indicated by estimates based on documented attempts. A sizable minority of undetected SAs result in significant injury. Soldiers reporting an undetected SA tend to be higher ranking than those with documented SAs. Undetected SAs require additional approaches to identifying individuals at risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Undetected suicide attempts among U.S. soldiers: results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).\",\"authors\":\"James A Naifeh, Robert J Ursano, Rachel Shor, Holly B Herberman Mash, Pablo A Aliaga, Carol S Fullerton, Matthew K Nock, Tzu-Cheg Kao, Nancy A Sampson, Ronald C Kessler, Murray B Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0033291724001028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While previous studies have reported high rates of documented suicide attempts (SAs) in the U.S. Army, the extent to which soldiers make SAs that are not identified in the healthcare system is unknown. Understanding undetected suicidal behavior is important in broadening prevention and intervention efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Representative survey of U.S. Regular Army enlisted soldiers (<i>n</i> = 24 475). Reported SAs during service were compared with SAs documented in administrative medical records. Logistic regression analyses examined sociodemographic characteristics differentiating soldiers with an undetected SA v. documented SA. Among those with an undetected SA, chi-square tests examined characteristics associated with receiving a mental health diagnosis (MH-Dx) prior to SA. Discrete-time survival analysis estimated risk of undetected SA by time in service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prevalence of undetected SA (unweighted <i>n</i> = 259) was 1.3%. Annual incidence was 255.6 per 100 000 soldiers, suggesting one in three SAs are undetected. In multivariable analysis, rank ⩾E5 (OR = 3.1[95%CI 1.6-5.7]) was associated with increased odds of undetected v. documented SA. Females were more likely to have a MH-Dx prior to their undetected SA (Rao-Scott <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup><sub>1</sub> = 6.1, <i>p</i> = .01). Over one-fifth of undetected SAs resulted in at least moderate injury. Risk of undetected SA was greater during the first four years of service.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that substantially more soldiers make SAs than indicated by estimates based on documented attempts. A sizable minority of undetected SAs result in significant injury. Soldiers reporting an undetected SA tend to be higher ranking than those with documented SAs. Undetected SAs require additional approaches to identifying individuals at risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724001028\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724001028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管之前的研究报告称美国陆军中记录在案的自杀未遂(SAs)率很高,但士兵在多大程度上做出了未被医疗系统识别的自杀行为尚不得而知。了解未被发现的自杀行为对于扩大预防和干预工作具有重要意义:方法:对美国正规军入伍士兵(n = 24 475)进行代表性调查。将服役期间报告的自杀行为与行政医疗记录中记录的自杀行为进行比较。逻辑回归分析研究了未检测到 SA 与有记录 SA 的士兵的社会人口学特征。在未被发现 SA 的士兵中,卡方检验检查了与 SA 前接受心理健康诊断 (MH-Dx) 相关的特征。离散时间生存分析根据服务时间估算出未检测到 SA 的风险:结果:未被发现的 SA 患病率(未加权 n = 259)为 1.3%。年发病率为每 10 万名士兵中有 255.6 例,这表明每三名士兵中就有一人未被发现。在多变量分析中,军衔⩾E5(OR = 3.1[95%CI 1.6-5.7])与未检测到的 SA 和已记录的 SA 的几率增加有关。女性在未检测到 SA 之前更有可能患有 MH-Dx(Rao-Scott χ21 = 6.1,P = .01)。超过五分之一的未检测到的 SA 至少造成了中度伤害。在服役的前四年中,未被发现的自伤风险更大:研究结果表明,发生自毁行为的士兵人数远远多于根据记录的自毁行为估计的人数。在未被发现的自毁行为中,有相当一部分会造成重大伤害。与记录在案的 SA 相比,报告未被发现的 SA 的士兵往往级别更高。未被发现的自卫行为需要采取其他方法来识别有风险的个人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Undetected suicide attempts among U.S. soldiers: results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).

Background: While previous studies have reported high rates of documented suicide attempts (SAs) in the U.S. Army, the extent to which soldiers make SAs that are not identified in the healthcare system is unknown. Understanding undetected suicidal behavior is important in broadening prevention and intervention efforts.

Methods: Representative survey of U.S. Regular Army enlisted soldiers (n = 24 475). Reported SAs during service were compared with SAs documented in administrative medical records. Logistic regression analyses examined sociodemographic characteristics differentiating soldiers with an undetected SA v. documented SA. Among those with an undetected SA, chi-square tests examined characteristics associated with receiving a mental health diagnosis (MH-Dx) prior to SA. Discrete-time survival analysis estimated risk of undetected SA by time in service.

Results: Prevalence of undetected SA (unweighted n = 259) was 1.3%. Annual incidence was 255.6 per 100 000 soldiers, suggesting one in three SAs are undetected. In multivariable analysis, rank ⩾E5 (OR = 3.1[95%CI 1.6-5.7]) was associated with increased odds of undetected v. documented SA. Females were more likely to have a MH-Dx prior to their undetected SA (Rao-Scott χ21 = 6.1, p = .01). Over one-fifth of undetected SAs resulted in at least moderate injury. Risk of undetected SA was greater during the first four years of service.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that substantially more soldiers make SAs than indicated by estimates based on documented attempts. A sizable minority of undetected SAs result in significant injury. Soldiers reporting an undetected SA tend to be higher ranking than those with documented SAs. Undetected SAs require additional approaches to identifying individuals at risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
期刊最新文献
Enriching ultra-high risk for psychosis cohorts based on accumulated exposure to environmental risk factors for psychotic disorders. Examining the association between aggression and suicide attempts among army soldiers. A comparative meta-analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging studies and gene expression profiles revealing the similarities and differences between late life depression and mild cognitive impairment. Letter to the editor: social influences on the relationship between dissociation and psychotic-like experience. Review and consensus on pharmacogenomic testing in psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1