通过盆腔超声波、磁共振成像或诊断性宫腔镜检查确诊膀胱峡部畸形的相关因素:一项横断面研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Reproductive Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1007/s43032-024-01711-8
João Paulo Leonardo-Pinto, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito, Renata Teles Piva Belluomini, Cristina Laguna Benetti-Pinto, Daniela Angerame Yela
{"title":"通过盆腔超声波、磁共振成像或诊断性宫腔镜检查确诊膀胱峡部畸形的相关因素:一项横断面研究。","authors":"João Paulo Leonardo-Pinto, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito, Renata Teles Piva Belluomini, Cristina Laguna Benetti-Pinto, Daniela Angerame Yela","doi":"10.1007/s43032-024-01711-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to analyze the prevalence of isthmocele and factors associated with its onset within a cohort of women with previous history of cesarean section. A cross-sectional study with 90 women assessed from 2020 to 2022. Isthmocele was a composite variable diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or diagnostic hysteroscopy (DxHys) and were asked about clinical symptoms, sociodemographic and obstetrical history and quality of life by the WHO-QOL questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate analysis (odds ratio (OR) plus 95% confidence intervals-CI) were performed to seek factors associated with the presence of isthmocele (5% significance level).The prevalence of isthmocele after combining MRI, TVUS and DxHys was 63.3% (n = 57). Women with isthmocele presented a higher body mass index (BMI) measured during delivery (32.70 ± 6.07 vs. 28.28 ± 9.86 kg/m<sup>2</sup>;p < 0.05) than women without isthmocele. Other sociodemographic variables, obstetrical history and WHO-QOL subdomains did not differ between groups. Within women with isthmocele, the residual myometrial mantle had an average of 4.97 ± 1.57 cm. Uterine volume was higher in the isthmocele group (103.95 vs. 81.34 cm<sup>3</sup>; p = 0.08), but with no statistical difference. Multivariate analysis (logistic regression) has reported that the factors associated with isthmocele were: higher BMI during delivery (aOR = 1.26[1.07-1.49];p < 0.05); longer interpartum interval (aOR = 1.22[1.03-1.46];p = 0.02) and presence of more than two cesarean sections (aOR = 2.16[1.16-4.01];p = 0.02). We concluded that a high prevalence of isthmocele was found. Women with previous cesarean section, with higher BMI during delivery and longer interdelivery interval were risk factors for the presence of isthmocele.</p>","PeriodicalId":20920,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Associated to the Presence of Isthmocele Diagnosed by Pelvic Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Diagnostic Hysteroscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"João Paulo Leonardo-Pinto, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito, Renata Teles Piva Belluomini, Cristina Laguna Benetti-Pinto, Daniela Angerame Yela\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43032-024-01711-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We aimed to analyze the prevalence of isthmocele and factors associated with its onset within a cohort of women with previous history of cesarean section. A cross-sectional study with 90 women assessed from 2020 to 2022. Isthmocele was a composite variable diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or diagnostic hysteroscopy (DxHys) and were asked about clinical symptoms, sociodemographic and obstetrical history and quality of life by the WHO-QOL questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate analysis (odds ratio (OR) plus 95% confidence intervals-CI) were performed to seek factors associated with the presence of isthmocele (5% significance level).The prevalence of isthmocele after combining MRI, TVUS and DxHys was 63.3% (n = 57). Women with isthmocele presented a higher body mass index (BMI) measured during delivery (32.70 ± 6.07 vs. 28.28 ± 9.86 kg/m<sup>2</sup>;p < 0.05) than women without isthmocele. Other sociodemographic variables, obstetrical history and WHO-QOL subdomains did not differ between groups. Within women with isthmocele, the residual myometrial mantle had an average of 4.97 ± 1.57 cm. Uterine volume was higher in the isthmocele group (103.95 vs. 81.34 cm<sup>3</sup>; p = 0.08), but with no statistical difference. Multivariate analysis (logistic regression) has reported that the factors associated with isthmocele were: higher BMI during delivery (aOR = 1.26[1.07-1.49];p < 0.05); longer interpartum interval (aOR = 1.22[1.03-1.46];p = 0.02) and presence of more than two cesarean sections (aOR = 2.16[1.16-4.01];p = 0.02). We concluded that a high prevalence of isthmocele was found. Women with previous cesarean section, with higher BMI during delivery and longer interdelivery interval were risk factors for the presence of isthmocele.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01711-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01711-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是分析曾有过剖宫产史的妇女队列中的峡部畸形发病率及其相关因素。这是一项横断面研究,在 2020 年至 2022 年期间对 90 名妇女进行了评估。经阴道超声(TVUS)、磁共振成像(MRI)和/或诊断性宫腔镜检查(DxHys)确诊的子宫内膜异位症是一个复合变量,研究人员通过世界卫生组织的 QOL 问卷询问了临床症状、社会人口学和产科病史以及生活质量。研究人员进行了单变量和多变量分析(几率比(OR)加95%置信区间-CI),以寻找与峡部畸形相关的因素(显著性水平为5%)。综合磁共振成像、TVUS和DxHys检查后,峡部畸形的患病率为63.3%(57人)。在分娩过程中测量的体重指数(BMI)显示,患有峡部疝的妇女的体重指数更高(32.70 ± 6.07 vs. 28.28 ± 9.86 kg/m2;P 3;P = 0.08),但没有统计学差异。多变量分析(逻辑回归)显示,与峡部肌瘤相关的因素有:分娩时体重指数较高(aOR = 1.26[1.07-1.49];p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors Associated to the Presence of Isthmocele Diagnosed by Pelvic Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Diagnostic Hysteroscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study.

We aimed to analyze the prevalence of isthmocele and factors associated with its onset within a cohort of women with previous history of cesarean section. A cross-sectional study with 90 women assessed from 2020 to 2022. Isthmocele was a composite variable diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or diagnostic hysteroscopy (DxHys) and were asked about clinical symptoms, sociodemographic and obstetrical history and quality of life by the WHO-QOL questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate analysis (odds ratio (OR) plus 95% confidence intervals-CI) were performed to seek factors associated with the presence of isthmocele (5% significance level).The prevalence of isthmocele after combining MRI, TVUS and DxHys was 63.3% (n = 57). Women with isthmocele presented a higher body mass index (BMI) measured during delivery (32.70 ± 6.07 vs. 28.28 ± 9.86 kg/m2;p < 0.05) than women without isthmocele. Other sociodemographic variables, obstetrical history and WHO-QOL subdomains did not differ between groups. Within women with isthmocele, the residual myometrial mantle had an average of 4.97 ± 1.57 cm. Uterine volume was higher in the isthmocele group (103.95 vs. 81.34 cm3; p = 0.08), but with no statistical difference. Multivariate analysis (logistic regression) has reported that the factors associated with isthmocele were: higher BMI during delivery (aOR = 1.26[1.07-1.49];p < 0.05); longer interpartum interval (aOR = 1.22[1.03-1.46];p = 0.02) and presence of more than two cesarean sections (aOR = 2.16[1.16-4.01];p = 0.02). We concluded that a high prevalence of isthmocele was found. Women with previous cesarean section, with higher BMI during delivery and longer interdelivery interval were risk factors for the presence of isthmocele.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Sciences
Reproductive Sciences 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
322
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Sciences (RS) is a peer-reviewed, monthly journal publishing original research and reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. RS is multi-disciplinary and includes research in basic reproductive biology and medicine, maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, urogynecology, fertility/infertility, embryology, gynecologic/reproductive oncology, developmental biology, stem cell research, molecular/cellular biology and other related fields.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Letrozole Versus Combination Letrozole and Clomiphene Citrate (CC) for Ovulation Induction in Sub Fertile Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS)-An Open Label Randomized Control Trial. Establishment of 3D Cultures of Myometrium, Leiomyoma, and Leiomyosarcoma Cells: Advantages and Disadvantages of Two Different Models. Menstrual Blood-Derived Endometrial Stem Cells Ameliorate Ovarian Senescence by Relieving Oxidative Stress-Induced Inflammation. Polycystic Ovary Morphology, Subclinical Hypothyroidism, and the Cutoff Value of Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone, a Population-Based Study. Effect of Different Concentrations of PRP on the Expression of Factors Involved in the Endometrial Receptivity in the Human Endometrial Cells from RIF Patients Compared to the Controls.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1