Nicholas A Pierorazio, Jerrica L Robertson, M Shae Nester, Bethany L Brand
{"title":"\"他们认为我在胡编乱造\":解离者对其解离的理解、临床医生对解离概念的看法以及二者之间的差异。","authors":"Nicholas A Pierorazio, Jerrica L Robertson, M Shae Nester, Bethany L Brand","doi":"10.1037/tra0001800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dissociation is thought to be traumagenic, though this conceptualization is not without misunderstanding and stigma. There is little research regarding people's conceptualizations of their dissociative experiences and client-clinician discrepancies in understanding dissociation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An online survey assessed 208 self-reported dissociative participants' understandings of their dissociation and their beliefs about their clinicians' understanding of dissociation via two open-ended questions. Template analysis, a codebook thematic analysis approach, was employed to explore and compare the ways people understand their dissociation and their perceptions of their clinicians' conceptualizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were developed to capture participants' perspectives: (1) Dissociation as Stigmatized and Underexplored (<i>n</i> = 83; 39.90%); (2) Dissociation as Individualized and Normalized Lived Experience (<i>n</i> = 173; 83.17%); (3) Dissociation as Clinical and/or Pathological (<i>n</i> = 112; 53.85%); and (4) Dissociation Through Etiological Frameworks (<i>n</i> = 67; 32.21%). Overall, 73.48% of participants indicated discrepancies between their understandings of their dissociation and those of their clinicians. Participants understood their dissociation through a lens of individualized and normalized lived experiences (100.00%) more often than their clinicians (23.12%). They believed their clinicians held more clinical understandings of dissociation (81.25%) than themselves (69.64%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the perceived discrepancies between clients' and clinicians' understandings of dissociation, clinicians should engage in discussions with their clients about their dissociation-related lived experiences with awareness that they may have been misunderstood by previous providers. Client-clinician discrepancies should be addressed, as failure to do so could lead to misunderstandings and ruptures in the therapeutic relationship. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"They thought I was just making it up\\\": Dissociative individuals' understandings of their dissociation, perceptions of their clinicians' conceptualizations of dissociation, and discrepancies between them.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas A Pierorazio, Jerrica L Robertson, M Shae Nester, Bethany L Brand\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tra0001800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dissociation is thought to be traumagenic, though this conceptualization is not without misunderstanding and stigma. There is little research regarding people's conceptualizations of their dissociative experiences and client-clinician discrepancies in understanding dissociation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An online survey assessed 208 self-reported dissociative participants' understandings of their dissociation and their beliefs about their clinicians' understanding of dissociation via two open-ended questions. Template analysis, a codebook thematic analysis approach, was employed to explore and compare the ways people understand their dissociation and their perceptions of their clinicians' conceptualizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were developed to capture participants' perspectives: (1) Dissociation as Stigmatized and Underexplored (<i>n</i> = 83; 39.90%); (2) Dissociation as Individualized and Normalized Lived Experience (<i>n</i> = 173; 83.17%); (3) Dissociation as Clinical and/or Pathological (<i>n</i> = 112; 53.85%); and (4) Dissociation Through Etiological Frameworks (<i>n</i> = 67; 32.21%). Overall, 73.48% of participants indicated discrepancies between their understandings of their dissociation and those of their clinicians. Participants understood their dissociation through a lens of individualized and normalized lived experiences (100.00%) more often than their clinicians (23.12%). They believed their clinicians held more clinical understandings of dissociation (81.25%) than themselves (69.64%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the perceived discrepancies between clients' and clinicians' understandings of dissociation, clinicians should engage in discussions with their clients about their dissociation-related lived experiences with awareness that they may have been misunderstood by previous providers. Client-clinician discrepancies should be addressed, as failure to do so could lead to misunderstandings and ruptures in the therapeutic relationship. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001800\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001800","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
"They thought I was just making it up": Dissociative individuals' understandings of their dissociation, perceptions of their clinicians' conceptualizations of dissociation, and discrepancies between them.
Objective: Dissociation is thought to be traumagenic, though this conceptualization is not without misunderstanding and stigma. There is little research regarding people's conceptualizations of their dissociative experiences and client-clinician discrepancies in understanding dissociation.
Method: An online survey assessed 208 self-reported dissociative participants' understandings of their dissociation and their beliefs about their clinicians' understanding of dissociation via two open-ended questions. Template analysis, a codebook thematic analysis approach, was employed to explore and compare the ways people understand their dissociation and their perceptions of their clinicians' conceptualizations.
Results: Four themes were developed to capture participants' perspectives: (1) Dissociation as Stigmatized and Underexplored (n = 83; 39.90%); (2) Dissociation as Individualized and Normalized Lived Experience (n = 173; 83.17%); (3) Dissociation as Clinical and/or Pathological (n = 112; 53.85%); and (4) Dissociation Through Etiological Frameworks (n = 67; 32.21%). Overall, 73.48% of participants indicated discrepancies between their understandings of their dissociation and those of their clinicians. Participants understood their dissociation through a lens of individualized and normalized lived experiences (100.00%) more often than their clinicians (23.12%). They believed their clinicians held more clinical understandings of dissociation (81.25%) than themselves (69.64%).
Conclusions: Given the perceived discrepancies between clients' and clinicians' understandings of dissociation, clinicians should engage in discussions with their clients about their dissociation-related lived experiences with awareness that they may have been misunderstood by previous providers. Client-clinician discrepancies should be addressed, as failure to do so could lead to misunderstandings and ruptures in the therapeutic relationship. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy.
The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including:
-Psychological treatments and effects
-Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma
-Assessment and diagnosis of trauma
-Pathophysiology of trauma reactions
-Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations)
-Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies
-Neuroimaging studies
-Trauma and cultural competence