[德国物理治疗受训人员和学生对疼痛的认知现状及教学干预措施的影响]。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Schmerz Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1007/s00482-024-00832-y
Ahura Bassimtabar, Martin Alfuth
{"title":"[德国物理治疗受训人员和学生对疼痛的认知现状及教学干预措施的影响]。","authors":"Ahura Bassimtabar, Martin Alfuth","doi":"10.1007/s00482-024-00832-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In order to properly inform patients about their pain and initiate targeted therapies, it is important for physiotherapists to learn about the latest scientific evidence on pain during their training.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the pain knowledge of German physiotherapy trainees and students. In addition, the influence of a teaching intervention (Pain Neuroscience Education, PNE) on their pain knowledge was investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online test was performed, which contained the German versions of the revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (rNPQ-D) and the Essential Knowledge of Pain Questionnaire (EKPQ). This test was completed by physiotherapy trainees and students (N = 279) in their final semester of vocational education or graduation under virtual supervision. After the test, a sub-cohort of physiotherapy trainees (n = 31) received a four-hour online teaching intervention (PNE), whereupon two retests took place.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean rNPQ-D score (63.8%) was significantly higher than the mean EKPQ score (28.4%) (p < 0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between the scores of rNPQ-D and EKPQ (r = 0.365, p < 0.001). Undergraduate students from university (n = 142) achieved significantly higher scores in both questionnaires (p < 0.001) compared to trainees from vocational schools (n = 137). In the sub-cohort, the online teaching intervention significantly improved the scores of both questionnaires immediately (p < 0.001) and six weeks after intervention (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The knowledge of German physiotherapy students about pain seems to be insufficient for an evidence-based treatment of pain patients. A PNE-based online learning program with the latest scientific evidence can significantly improve physiotherapy students' knowledge about pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":21572,"journal":{"name":"Schmerz","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Current knowledge of German physiotherapy trainees and students on pain and the influence of a teaching intervention].\",\"authors\":\"Ahura Bassimtabar, Martin Alfuth\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00482-024-00832-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In order to properly inform patients about their pain and initiate targeted therapies, it is important for physiotherapists to learn about the latest scientific evidence on pain during their training.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the pain knowledge of German physiotherapy trainees and students. In addition, the influence of a teaching intervention (Pain Neuroscience Education, PNE) on their pain knowledge was investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online test was performed, which contained the German versions of the revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (rNPQ-D) and the Essential Knowledge of Pain Questionnaire (EKPQ). This test was completed by physiotherapy trainees and students (N = 279) in their final semester of vocational education or graduation under virtual supervision. After the test, a sub-cohort of physiotherapy trainees (n = 31) received a four-hour online teaching intervention (PNE), whereupon two retests took place.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean rNPQ-D score (63.8%) was significantly higher than the mean EKPQ score (28.4%) (p < 0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between the scores of rNPQ-D and EKPQ (r = 0.365, p < 0.001). Undergraduate students from university (n = 142) achieved significantly higher scores in both questionnaires (p < 0.001) compared to trainees from vocational schools (n = 137). In the sub-cohort, the online teaching intervention significantly improved the scores of both questionnaires immediately (p < 0.001) and six weeks after intervention (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The knowledge of German physiotherapy students about pain seems to be insufficient for an evidence-based treatment of pain patients. A PNE-based online learning program with the latest scientific evidence can significantly improve physiotherapy students' knowledge about pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schmerz\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schmerz\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-024-00832-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schmerz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-024-00832-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:本研究旨在评估德国物理治疗实习生和学生的疼痛知识。此外,还调查了教学干预(疼痛神经科学教育,PNE)对疼痛知识的影响:方法:进行了一项在线测试,其中包括德文版疼痛神经生理学问卷(rNPQ-D)和疼痛基本知识问卷(EKPQ)。该测试由职业教育或毕业班最后一学期的物理治疗学员和学生(279 人)在虚拟指导下完成。测试结束后,一部分物理治疗学员(31 人)接受了四小时的在线教学干预(PNE),之后进行了两次重测:结果:rNPQ-D 的平均得分(63.8%)明显高于 EKPQ 的平均得分(28.4%)(p 结论:德国物理治疗专业学生对物理治疗知识的了解程度远高于 EKPQ:德国物理治疗专业学生的疼痛知识似乎不足以对疼痛患者进行循证治疗。以 PNE 为基础的在线学习项目提供了最新的科学证据,可显著提高物理治疗专业学生的疼痛知识水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Current knowledge of German physiotherapy trainees and students on pain and the influence of a teaching intervention].

Background: In order to properly inform patients about their pain and initiate targeted therapies, it is important for physiotherapists to learn about the latest scientific evidence on pain during their training.

Aim: This study aimed to assess the pain knowledge of German physiotherapy trainees and students. In addition, the influence of a teaching intervention (Pain Neuroscience Education, PNE) on their pain knowledge was investigated.

Methods: An online test was performed, which contained the German versions of the revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (rNPQ-D) and the Essential Knowledge of Pain Questionnaire (EKPQ). This test was completed by physiotherapy trainees and students (N = 279) in their final semester of vocational education or graduation under virtual supervision. After the test, a sub-cohort of physiotherapy trainees (n = 31) received a four-hour online teaching intervention (PNE), whereupon two retests took place.

Results: The mean rNPQ-D score (63.8%) was significantly higher than the mean EKPQ score (28.4%) (p < 0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between the scores of rNPQ-D and EKPQ (r = 0.365, p < 0.001). Undergraduate students from university (n = 142) achieved significantly higher scores in both questionnaires (p < 0.001) compared to trainees from vocational schools (n = 137). In the sub-cohort, the online teaching intervention significantly improved the scores of both questionnaires immediately (p < 0.001) and six weeks after intervention (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The knowledge of German physiotherapy students about pain seems to be insufficient for an evidence-based treatment of pain patients. A PNE-based online learning program with the latest scientific evidence can significantly improve physiotherapy students' knowledge about pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Schmerz
Schmerz 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Schmerz is an internationally recognized journal and addresses all scientists, practitioners and psychologists, dealing with the treatment of pain patients or working in pain research. The aim of the journal is to enhance the treatment of pain patients in the long run. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of pain research, pain management and pain symptom management. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
期刊最新文献
Mitteilungen der Deutschen Schmerzgesellschaft e.V. Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Schmerzgesellschaft. [Emotions in chronic pain : Changes in the course of day clinic interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy]. [Pain-related stigma in patients with breast, colon, prostate or lung cancer : Results of a bicentric register-based cross-sectional study]. [Concept-dependent and -independent care effects of site-specific care concepts using "pain" as an example].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1