经皮经肝胆囊引流术后内镜胆囊支架植入术的益处。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2902
Fumitaka Niiya, Naoki Tamai, Masataka Yamawaki, Jun Noda, Tetsushi Azami, Yuichi Takano, Fumiya Nishimoto, Masatsugu Nagahama
{"title":"经皮经肝胆囊引流术后内镜胆囊支架植入术的益处。","authors":"Fumitaka Niiya, Naoki Tamai, Masataka Yamawaki, Jun Noda, Tetsushi Azami, Yuichi Takano, Fumiya Nishimoto, Masatsugu Nagahama","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage is challenging because of the complexity of the procedure and high incidence of adverse events (AEs). To overcome these problems, endoscopic gallbladder stenting (EGBS) after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) can be effective, as it mitigates inflammation and adhesion.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the benefits of EGBS after PTGBD to assess its efficacy and impact on AEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from 35 patients who underwent EGBS after PTGBD at a single center between January 2016 and December 2023. The primary outcomes were technical success and AEs, and the rate of recurrent cholecystitis was evaluated. In addition, the reasons for the failure of the procedure were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 35 patients, the technical success rate was 77.1% and the final contrast of the cystic duct was successful in 97.1% of patients. The incidence of early AEs was relatively low (11.4%), with no instances of cystic duct perforation. The rate of recurrent cholecystitis was 3.7%, and no other biliary events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EGBS after PTGBD may be significantly beneficial, with a substantial success rate and minimal AEs in both short- and long-term follow-ups.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11438794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits of endoscopic gallbladder stenting following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage.\",\"authors\":\"Fumitaka Niiya, Naoki Tamai, Masataka Yamawaki, Jun Noda, Tetsushi Azami, Yuichi Takano, Fumiya Nishimoto, Masatsugu Nagahama\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage is challenging because of the complexity of the procedure and high incidence of adverse events (AEs). To overcome these problems, endoscopic gallbladder stenting (EGBS) after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) can be effective, as it mitigates inflammation and adhesion.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the benefits of EGBS after PTGBD to assess its efficacy and impact on AEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from 35 patients who underwent EGBS after PTGBD at a single center between January 2016 and December 2023. The primary outcomes were technical success and AEs, and the rate of recurrent cholecystitis was evaluated. In addition, the reasons for the failure of the procedure were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 35 patients, the technical success rate was 77.1% and the final contrast of the cystic duct was successful in 97.1% of patients. The incidence of early AEs was relatively low (11.4%), with no instances of cystic duct perforation. The rate of recurrent cholecystitis was 3.7%, and no other biliary events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EGBS after PTGBD may be significantly beneficial, with a substantial success rate and minimal AEs in both short- and long-term follow-ups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11438794/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2902\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2902","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内镜下经肝胆囊引流术是一项具有挑战性的手术,因为手术过程复杂,不良事件(AEs)发生率高。为了克服这些问题,在经皮经肝胆囊引流术(PTGBD)后进行内镜下胆囊支架植入术(EGBS)可以有效缓解炎症和粘连。目的:研究经皮经肝胆囊引流术后进行 EGBS 的益处,评估其疗效和对 AEs 的影响:我们回顾性分析了 2016 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间在一个中心接受 PTGBD 后进行 EGBS 的 35 例患者的数据。主要结果为技术成功率和 AEs,并评估了复发性胆囊炎的发生率。此外,还确定了手术失败的原因:结果:在35名患者中,技术成功率为77.1%,97.1%的患者最终成功进行了胆囊管造影。早期AE发生率相对较低(11.4%),无囊管穿孔病例。复发性胆囊炎的发生率为 3.7%,未观察到其他胆道事件:结论:PTGBD 术后行 EGBS 可显著获益,成功率高,短期和长期随访中的 AEs 极少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benefits of endoscopic gallbladder stenting following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage.

Background: Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage is challenging because of the complexity of the procedure and high incidence of adverse events (AEs). To overcome these problems, endoscopic gallbladder stenting (EGBS) after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) can be effective, as it mitigates inflammation and adhesion.

Aim: To examine the benefits of EGBS after PTGBD to assess its efficacy and impact on AEs.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 35 patients who underwent EGBS after PTGBD at a single center between January 2016 and December 2023. The primary outcomes were technical success and AEs, and the rate of recurrent cholecystitis was evaluated. In addition, the reasons for the failure of the procedure were identified.

Results: Among the 35 patients, the technical success rate was 77.1% and the final contrast of the cystic duct was successful in 97.1% of patients. The incidence of early AEs was relatively low (11.4%), with no instances of cystic duct perforation. The rate of recurrent cholecystitis was 3.7%, and no other biliary events were observed.

Conclusion: EGBS after PTGBD may be significantly beneficial, with a substantial success rate and minimal AEs in both short- and long-term follow-ups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of B-ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of primary liver cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopic clipping of gastrojejunostomy leakage following Whipple procedure: A case report. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: The road is open for almighty biliopancreatic endoscopists! Enhancing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure efficiency with digital subtraction angiography image overlay technology in esophagogastric variceal bleeding. Establishment and evaluation of prediction model of recurrence after laparoscopic choledocholithotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1