胃肠道手术麻醉患者术中目标导向液体疗法的效果。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2815
Jun Zhang, Xiao-Wen Li, Bing-Feng Xie
{"title":"胃肠道手术麻醉患者术中目标导向液体疗法的效果。","authors":"Jun Zhang, Xiao-Wen Li, Bing-Feng Xie","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative fluid management is an important aspect of anesthesia management in gastrointestinal surgery. Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is a method for optimizing a patient's physiological state by monitoring and regulating fluid input in real-time.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative GDFT in patients under anesthesia for gastrointestinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized a retrospective comparative study design and included 60 patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery at a hospital. The experimental group (GDFT group) and the control group, each comprising 30 patients, received intraoperative GDFT and traditional fluid management strategies, respectively. The effect of GDFT was evaluated by comparing postoperative recovery, complication rates, hospitalization time, and other indicators between the two patient groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative blood loss in the experimental and control groups was 296.64 ± 46.71 mL and 470.05 ± 73.26 mL (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and urine volume was 415.13 ± 96.72 mL and 239.15 ± 94.69 mL (<i>P</i> < 0.001), respectively. The postoperative recovery time was 5.44 ± 1.1 days for the experimental group compared to 7.59 ± 1.45 days (<i>P</i> < 0.001) for the control group. Hospitalization time for the experimental group was 10.87 ± 2.36 days <i>vs</i> 13.65 ± 3 days for the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The visual analogue scale scores of the experimental and control groups at 24 h and 48 h post-surgery were 3.38 ± 0.79 and 4.51 ± 0.86, and 2.05 ± 0.57 and 3.51 ± 0.97 (<i>P</i> < 0.001), respectively. The cardiac output of the experimental and control groups was 5.99 ± 1.04 L/min and 4.88 ± 1.17 L/min, respectively, while the pulse pressure variability for these two groups was 10.87 ± 2.36% and 17.5 ± 3.21%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of GDFT in gastrointestinal surgery can significantly improve postoperative recovery, reduce the incidence of complications, and shorten hospital stays.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11438805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in patients under anesthesia for gastrointestinal surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Jun Zhang, Xiao-Wen Li, Bing-Feng Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative fluid management is an important aspect of anesthesia management in gastrointestinal surgery. Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is a method for optimizing a patient's physiological state by monitoring and regulating fluid input in real-time.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative GDFT in patients under anesthesia for gastrointestinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized a retrospective comparative study design and included 60 patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery at a hospital. The experimental group (GDFT group) and the control group, each comprising 30 patients, received intraoperative GDFT and traditional fluid management strategies, respectively. The effect of GDFT was evaluated by comparing postoperative recovery, complication rates, hospitalization time, and other indicators between the two patient groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative blood loss in the experimental and control groups was 296.64 ± 46.71 mL and 470.05 ± 73.26 mL (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and urine volume was 415.13 ± 96.72 mL and 239.15 ± 94.69 mL (<i>P</i> < 0.001), respectively. The postoperative recovery time was 5.44 ± 1.1 days for the experimental group compared to 7.59 ± 1.45 days (<i>P</i> < 0.001) for the control group. Hospitalization time for the experimental group was 10.87 ± 2.36 days <i>vs</i> 13.65 ± 3 days for the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The visual analogue scale scores of the experimental and control groups at 24 h and 48 h post-surgery were 3.38 ± 0.79 and 4.51 ± 0.86, and 2.05 ± 0.57 and 3.51 ± 0.97 (<i>P</i> < 0.001), respectively. The cardiac output of the experimental and control groups was 5.99 ± 1.04 L/min and 4.88 ± 1.17 L/min, respectively, while the pulse pressure variability for these two groups was 10.87 ± 2.36% and 17.5 ± 3.21%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of GDFT in gastrointestinal surgery can significantly improve postoperative recovery, reduce the incidence of complications, and shorten hospital stays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11438805/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2815\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2815","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术中液体管理是胃肠道手术麻醉管理的一个重要方面。术中目标导向液体疗法(GDFT)是一种通过实时监测和调节液体输入来优化患者生理状态的方法:本研究采用回顾性对比研究设计,纳入了在一家医院接受胃肠道手术的 60 名患者。实验组(GDFT 组)和对照组各 30 名患者分别接受术中 GDFT 和传统液体管理策略。通过比较两组患者的术后恢复情况、并发症发生率、住院时间等指标来评估 GDFT 的效果:实验组和对照组的术中失血量分别为(296.64 ± 46.71)毫升和(470.05 ± 73.26)毫升(P < 0.001),尿量分别为(415.13 ± 96.72)毫升和(239.15 ± 94.69)毫升(P < 0.001)。实验组术后恢复时间为(5.44 ± 1.1)天,对照组为(7.59 ± 1.45)天(P < 0.001)。实验组的住院时间为 10.87 ± 2.36 天,对照组为 13.65 ± 3 天(P < 0.001)。实验组和对照组在术后 24 小时和 48 小时的视觉模拟量表评分分别为(3.38 ± 0.79)和(4.51 ± 0.86),以及(2.05 ± 0.57)和(3.51 ± 0.97)(P < 0.001)。实验组和对照组的心输出量分别为 5.99 ± 1.04 L/min 和 4.88 ± 1.17 L/min,两组的脉压变异率分别为 10.87 ± 2.36% 和 17.5 ± 3.21%:在胃肠道手术中应用 GDFT 可显著改善术后恢复,降低并发症的发生率,缩短住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in patients under anesthesia for gastrointestinal surgery.

Background: Intraoperative fluid management is an important aspect of anesthesia management in gastrointestinal surgery. Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is a method for optimizing a patient's physiological state by monitoring and regulating fluid input in real-time.

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative GDFT in patients under anesthesia for gastrointestinal surgery.

Methods: This study utilized a retrospective comparative study design and included 60 patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery at a hospital. The experimental group (GDFT group) and the control group, each comprising 30 patients, received intraoperative GDFT and traditional fluid management strategies, respectively. The effect of GDFT was evaluated by comparing postoperative recovery, complication rates, hospitalization time, and other indicators between the two patient groups.

Results: Intraoperative blood loss in the experimental and control groups was 296.64 ± 46.71 mL and 470.05 ± 73.26 mL (P < 0.001), and urine volume was 415.13 ± 96.72 mL and 239.15 ± 94.69 mL (P < 0.001), respectively. The postoperative recovery time was 5.44 ± 1.1 days for the experimental group compared to 7.59 ± 1.45 days (P < 0.001) for the control group. Hospitalization time for the experimental group was 10.87 ± 2.36 days vs 13.65 ± 3 days for the control group (P < 0.001). The visual analogue scale scores of the experimental and control groups at 24 h and 48 h post-surgery were 3.38 ± 0.79 and 4.51 ± 0.86, and 2.05 ± 0.57 and 3.51 ± 0.97 (P < 0.001), respectively. The cardiac output of the experimental and control groups was 5.99 ± 1.04 L/min and 4.88 ± 1.17 L/min, respectively, while the pulse pressure variability for these two groups was 10.87 ± 2.36% and 17.5 ± 3.21%, respectively.

Conclusion: The application of GDFT in gastrointestinal surgery can significantly improve postoperative recovery, reduce the incidence of complications, and shorten hospital stays.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of B-ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of primary liver cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopic clipping of gastrojejunostomy leakage following Whipple procedure: A case report. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: The road is open for almighty biliopancreatic endoscopists! Enhancing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure efficiency with digital subtraction angiography image overlay technology in esophagogastric variceal bleeding. Establishment and evaluation of prediction model of recurrence after laparoscopic choledocholithotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1