时代变迁:根治性前列腺切除术后风险分类、肿瘤上移和手术切缘阳性的趋势--来自当代国家癌症数据库研究的结果。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY World Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1007/s00345-024-05262-0
Pedro F S Freitas, Ruben Blachman-Braun, Nachiketh Soodana-Prakash, Adam D Williams, Chad R Ritch, Sanoj Punnen, Mark L Gonzalgo, Dipen Parekh, Bruno Nahar
{"title":"时代变迁:根治性前列腺切除术后风险分类、肿瘤上移和手术切缘阳性的趋势--来自当代国家癌症数据库研究的结果。","authors":"Pedro F S Freitas, Ruben Blachman-Braun, Nachiketh Soodana-Prakash, Adam D Williams, Chad R Ritch, Sanoj Punnen, Mark L Gonzalgo, Dipen Parekh, Bruno Nahar","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05262-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recent advancements in screening, prostate MRI, robotic surgery, and active surveillance have influenced the profile of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). We sought to examine their impact on trends in clinicodemographic, risk classification, and adverse pathology in men undergoing surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried the National Cancer Database for clinicodemographic, risk group, and pathology data in men undergoing upfront RP between 2006 and 2020. Patients were categorized by NCCN risk groups, and trends were assessed among 2006-2010, 2011-2015, and 2016-2020 periods. Endpoints included rates of pT3, positive surgical margins (PSM), pathologic upstaging, and Gleason grade group (GG) upgrading.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>610,762 patients were included. There were significant increases in African Americans (9.8-14.1%), comorbidities (2.1-5.2% with Charlson scores > 1), and robot-assisted RP (78-84%). Over the three time periods, high-risk cases increased from 15 to 20 to 27%, and intermediate-risk from 54 to 51 to 60%. Overall rates of pT3 rose from 20 to 38%, and PSM from 20 to 27% (p < 0.001). Pathologic upstaging increased in low (6-15%), intermediate (20-33%), and high-risk groups (42-58%) -p < 0.001. Gleason upgrading rose in low-risk (45-59%, p < 0.001), with slight reductions in the intermediate and high-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recent trends in RP indicate a shift towards more advanced disease, evidenced by increasing rates of pT3, PSM, and pathologic upstaging across all NCCN risk groups. These findings emphasize the need for a careful balance in applying fascia and nerve-sparing techniques to avoid compromising oncological safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"42 1","pages":"551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changing times: trends in risk classification, tumor upstaging, and positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy - results from a contemporary National Cancer Database study.\",\"authors\":\"Pedro F S Freitas, Ruben Blachman-Braun, Nachiketh Soodana-Prakash, Adam D Williams, Chad R Ritch, Sanoj Punnen, Mark L Gonzalgo, Dipen Parekh, Bruno Nahar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00345-024-05262-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recent advancements in screening, prostate MRI, robotic surgery, and active surveillance have influenced the profile of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). We sought to examine their impact on trends in clinicodemographic, risk classification, and adverse pathology in men undergoing surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried the National Cancer Database for clinicodemographic, risk group, and pathology data in men undergoing upfront RP between 2006 and 2020. Patients were categorized by NCCN risk groups, and trends were assessed among 2006-2010, 2011-2015, and 2016-2020 periods. Endpoints included rates of pT3, positive surgical margins (PSM), pathologic upstaging, and Gleason grade group (GG) upgrading.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>610,762 patients were included. There were significant increases in African Americans (9.8-14.1%), comorbidities (2.1-5.2% with Charlson scores > 1), and robot-assisted RP (78-84%). Over the three time periods, high-risk cases increased from 15 to 20 to 27%, and intermediate-risk from 54 to 51 to 60%. Overall rates of pT3 rose from 20 to 38%, and PSM from 20 to 27% (p < 0.001). Pathologic upstaging increased in low (6-15%), intermediate (20-33%), and high-risk groups (42-58%) -p < 0.001. Gleason upgrading rose in low-risk (45-59%, p < 0.001), with slight reductions in the intermediate and high-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recent trends in RP indicate a shift towards more advanced disease, evidenced by increasing rates of pT3, PSM, and pathologic upstaging across all NCCN risk groups. These findings emphasize the need for a careful balance in applying fascia and nerve-sparing techniques to avoid compromising oncological safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"551\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442602/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05262-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05262-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近在筛查、前列腺磁共振成像、机器人手术和主动监测方面取得的进展影响了接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的患者情况。我们试图研究它们对接受手术的男性患者的临床人口学、风险分类和不良病理趋势的影响:我们从国家癌症数据库中查询了 2006 年至 2020 年间接受前列腺癌根治术的男性患者的临床人口学、风险组别和病理学数据。根据 NCCN 风险组别对患者进行分类,并评估 2006-2010、2011-2015 和 2016-2020 年间的趋势。终点包括pT3、手术切缘阳性(PSM)、病理分期和Gleason分级组(GG)升级率:共纳入 610 762 名患者。非裔美国人(9.8%-14.1%)、合并症患者(2.1%-5.2%,Charlson评分大于1)和机器人辅助RP患者(78%-84%)明显增加。在这三个时间段内,高危病例从 15% 增加到 20% 再到 27%,中危病例从 54% 增加到 51% 再到 60%。pT3 的总体比例从 20% 上升到 38%,PSM 的比例从 20% 上升到 27%(P 结论):所有 NCCN 风险组的 pT3、PSM 和病理分期率都在上升,这表明 RP 的最新趋势是向更晚期疾病发展。这些发现强调了在应用筋膜和神经保留技术时需要谨慎平衡,以避免影响肿瘤安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Changing times: trends in risk classification, tumor upstaging, and positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy - results from a contemporary National Cancer Database study.

Purpose: Recent advancements in screening, prostate MRI, robotic surgery, and active surveillance have influenced the profile of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). We sought to examine their impact on trends in clinicodemographic, risk classification, and adverse pathology in men undergoing surgery.

Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database for clinicodemographic, risk group, and pathology data in men undergoing upfront RP between 2006 and 2020. Patients were categorized by NCCN risk groups, and trends were assessed among 2006-2010, 2011-2015, and 2016-2020 periods. Endpoints included rates of pT3, positive surgical margins (PSM), pathologic upstaging, and Gleason grade group (GG) upgrading.

Results: 610,762 patients were included. There were significant increases in African Americans (9.8-14.1%), comorbidities (2.1-5.2% with Charlson scores > 1), and robot-assisted RP (78-84%). Over the three time periods, high-risk cases increased from 15 to 20 to 27%, and intermediate-risk from 54 to 51 to 60%. Overall rates of pT3 rose from 20 to 38%, and PSM from 20 to 27% (p < 0.001). Pathologic upstaging increased in low (6-15%), intermediate (20-33%), and high-risk groups (42-58%) -p < 0.001. Gleason upgrading rose in low-risk (45-59%, p < 0.001), with slight reductions in the intermediate and high-risk groups.

Conclusions: Recent trends in RP indicate a shift towards more advanced disease, evidenced by increasing rates of pT3, PSM, and pathologic upstaging across all NCCN risk groups. These findings emphasize the need for a careful balance in applying fascia and nerve-sparing techniques to avoid compromising oncological safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
期刊最新文献
Can suction technology be a potential game changer that reshapes pediatric endourological interventions? Results from a scoping review. Does race and insurance status play a role in high-grade renal trauma in the pediatric population? - An analysis from the traumatic renal injury collaborative in kids (TRICK) consortium. Risk factors for kidney cancer and socio-occupational category: significant impact of chlorinated solvents (UroCCR 111). RAM2: animal study for safety evaluation of the new artificial urinary sphincter uroactive on a castrated RAM model. Correction: Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced and clinically positive nodes Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma treated with Nephroureterectomy: real-world data from the ROBUUST 2.0 Registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1