头孢他啶、头孢唑肟/阿维巴坦、头孢洛赞/他唑巴坦和美罗培南/伐巴坦对耐万古霉素肠球菌和肺炎克雷伯菌在小鼠体内定植的影响

Q1 Medicine Pathogens and Immunity Pub Date : 2024-09-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.20411/pai.v9i2.711
Bryan S Hausman, Samir Memic, Jennifer L Cadnum, Elizabeth G Zink, Brigid M Wilson, Curtis J Donskey
{"title":"头孢他啶、头孢唑肟/阿维巴坦、头孢洛赞/他唑巴坦和美罗培南/伐巴坦对耐万古霉素肠球菌和肺炎克雷伯菌在小鼠体内定植的影响","authors":"Bryan S Hausman, Samir Memic, Jennifer L Cadnum, Elizabeth G Zink, Brigid M Wilson, Curtis J Donskey","doi":"10.20411/pai.v9i2.711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The potential for promotion of intestinal colonization with healthcare-associated pathogens by new antibiotics used to treat infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mice treated for 3 days with daily subcutaneous phosphate-buffered saline (control), ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftaroline, and meropenem/vaborbactam were challenged with 10,000 colony-forming units (CFU) of vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus</i> (VRE) resistant to each of the antibioics or carbapenemase-producing <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> 1 day after the final treatment dose. The concentrations of VRE or <i>K. pneumoniae</i> in stool were measured on days 1, 3, 6, and 15 after challenge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Control mice had transient low levels of VRE or <i>K. pneumoniae</i> (<3 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g) detected in stool with negative cultures on days 6 and 15 after challenge. In comparison to control mice, each of the antibiotics promoted establishment of high-density colonization with VRE (mean concentration, >8 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g of stool on day 1 after challenge) that persisted at >4 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g of stool through day 15 (<i>P</i><0.01). In comparison to control mice, meropenem/vaborbactam and ceftaroline promoted high-density colonization with <i>K. pneumoniae</i> (peak concentration, >8 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g of stool) (<i>P</i><0.01), ceftolozane/tazobactam promoted colonization to a lesser degree (peak concentration, >5 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g of stool), and ceftazidime/avibactam did not promote colonization (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that several beta-lactam antibiotics recently developed for treatment of infections with resistant Gram-negative bacilli have the potential to promote colonization by healthcare-associated pathogens. Additional studies are needed to examine the impact of these agents in patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":36419,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens and Immunity","volume":"9 2","pages":"194-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11432534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Ceftaroline, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam on Establishment of Colonization by Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> in Mice.\",\"authors\":\"Bryan S Hausman, Samir Memic, Jennifer L Cadnum, Elizabeth G Zink, Brigid M Wilson, Curtis J Donskey\",\"doi\":\"10.20411/pai.v9i2.711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The potential for promotion of intestinal colonization with healthcare-associated pathogens by new antibiotics used to treat infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mice treated for 3 days with daily subcutaneous phosphate-buffered saline (control), ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftaroline, and meropenem/vaborbactam were challenged with 10,000 colony-forming units (CFU) of vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus</i> (VRE) resistant to each of the antibioics or carbapenemase-producing <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> 1 day after the final treatment dose. The concentrations of VRE or <i>K. pneumoniae</i> in stool were measured on days 1, 3, 6, and 15 after challenge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Control mice had transient low levels of VRE or <i>K. pneumoniae</i> (<3 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g) detected in stool with negative cultures on days 6 and 15 after challenge. In comparison to control mice, each of the antibiotics promoted establishment of high-density colonization with VRE (mean concentration, >8 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g of stool on day 1 after challenge) that persisted at >4 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g of stool through day 15 (<i>P</i><0.01). In comparison to control mice, meropenem/vaborbactam and ceftaroline promoted high-density colonization with <i>K. pneumoniae</i> (peak concentration, >8 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g of stool) (<i>P</i><0.01), ceftolozane/tazobactam promoted colonization to a lesser degree (peak concentration, >5 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g of stool), and ceftazidime/avibactam did not promote colonization (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that several beta-lactam antibiotics recently developed for treatment of infections with resistant Gram-negative bacilli have the potential to promote colonization by healthcare-associated pathogens. Additional studies are needed to examine the impact of these agents in patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathogens and Immunity\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"194-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11432534/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathogens and Immunity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20411/pai.v9i2.711\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens and Immunity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20411/pai.v9i2.711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:用于治疗耐多药革兰氏阴性杆菌感染的新型抗生素促进医疗相关病原体肠道定植的可能性尚不清楚:每天皮下注射磷酸盐缓冲盐水(对照组)、头孢唑肟/阿维巴坦、头孢洛氮烷/他唑巴坦、头孢他啶和美罗培南/伐硼巴坦治疗3天的小鼠,在最后一次治疗剂量后1天,接受对每种抗生素耐药的万古霉素耐药肠球菌(VRE)或产碳青霉烯酶肺炎克雷伯菌10,000菌落形成单位(CFU)的挑战。挑战后第 1、3、6 和 15 天测量粪便中 VRE 或肺炎克雷伯菌的浓度:结果:对照组小鼠在挑战后第 6 天和第 15 天的粪便中检测到一过性低水平的 VRE 或肺炎双球菌(10 CFU/g),培养结果为阴性。与对照组小鼠相比,每种抗生素都能促进 VRE 的高密度定植(平均浓度,挑战后第 1 天粪便中大于 8 log10 CFU/g),并在第 15 天粪便中持续大于 4 log10 CFU/g(PK. pneumoniae(峰值浓度,粪便中大于 8 log10 CFU/g)(P5 log10 CFU/g),而头孢唑肟/阿维巴坦不能促进定植(P>0.05):我们的研究结果表明,最近为治疗耐药革兰氏阴性杆菌感染而开发的几种β-内酰胺类抗生素有可能促进医疗相关病原体的定植。还需要进行更多的研究来探讨这些药物对患者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Ceftaroline, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam on Establishment of Colonization by Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Mice.

Background: The potential for promotion of intestinal colonization with healthcare-associated pathogens by new antibiotics used to treat infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli is unclear.

Methods: Mice treated for 3 days with daily subcutaneous phosphate-buffered saline (control), ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftaroline, and meropenem/vaborbactam were challenged with 10,000 colony-forming units (CFU) of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) resistant to each of the antibioics or carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae 1 day after the final treatment dose. The concentrations of VRE or K. pneumoniae in stool were measured on days 1, 3, 6, and 15 after challenge.

Results: Control mice had transient low levels of VRE or K. pneumoniae (<3 log10 CFU/g) detected in stool with negative cultures on days 6 and 15 after challenge. In comparison to control mice, each of the antibiotics promoted establishment of high-density colonization with VRE (mean concentration, >8 log10 CFU/g of stool on day 1 after challenge) that persisted at >4 log10 CFU/g of stool through day 15 (P<0.01). In comparison to control mice, meropenem/vaborbactam and ceftaroline promoted high-density colonization with K. pneumoniae (peak concentration, >8 log10 CFU/g of stool) (P<0.01), ceftolozane/tazobactam promoted colonization to a lesser degree (peak concentration, >5 log10 CFU/g of stool), and ceftazidime/avibactam did not promote colonization (P>0.05).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that several beta-lactam antibiotics recently developed for treatment of infections with resistant Gram-negative bacilli have the potential to promote colonization by healthcare-associated pathogens. Additional studies are needed to examine the impact of these agents in patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pathogens and Immunity
Pathogens and Immunity Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Historical Highlight: The Luria-Delbrück Fluctuation Test - A Study of the Nature of Bacterial Mutations Conferring Resistance to Infection by Bacteriophage. Escape of SARS-CoV-2 Variants KP.1.1, LB.1, and KP3.3 From Approved Monoclonal Antibodies. Jonathan Yewdell Discusses Viral Immunology, Vaccine Development, Navigating a Scientific Career, and Offers Perspectives on Transforming Scientific Publishing and Research Education. Effect of Ceftaroline, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam on Establishment of Colonization by Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Mice. People Living With HIV Have More Intact HIV DNA in Circulating CD4+ T Cells if They Have History of Pulmonary Tuberculosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1