Soumick Chatterjee, Alessandro Sciarra, Max Dünnwald, Anitha Bhat Talagini Ashoka, Mayura Gurjar Cheepinahalli Vasudeva, Shudarsan Saravanan, Venkatesh Thirugnana Sambandham, Pavan Tummala, Steffen Oeltze-Jafra, Oliver Speck, Andreas Nürnberger
{"title":"超越奈奎斯特:增强核磁共振成像分辨率的三维深度学习模型比较分析》(Beyond Nyquist: A Comparative Analysis of 3D Deep Learning Models Enhancing MRI Resolution.","authors":"Soumick Chatterjee, Alessandro Sciarra, Max Dünnwald, Anitha Bhat Talagini Ashoka, Mayura Gurjar Cheepinahalli Vasudeva, Shudarsan Saravanan, Venkatesh Thirugnana Sambandham, Pavan Tummala, Steffen Oeltze-Jafra, Oliver Speck, Andreas Nürnberger","doi":"10.3390/jimaging10090207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-spatial resolution MRI produces abundant structural information, enabling highly accurate clinical diagnosis and image-guided therapeutics. However, the acquisition of high-spatial resolution MRI data typically can come at the expense of less spatial coverage, lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and longer scan time due to physical, physiological and hardware limitations. In order to overcome these limitations, super-resolution MRI deep-learning-based techniques can be utilised. In this work, different state-of-the-art 3D convolution neural network models for super resolution (RRDB, SPSR, UNet, UNet-MSS and ShuffleUNet) were compared for the super-resolution task with the goal of finding the best model in terms of performance and robustness. The public IXI dataset (only structural images) was used. Data were artificially downsampled to obtain lower-resolution spatial MRIs (downsampling factor varying from 8 to 64). When assessing performance using the SSIM metric in the test set, all models performed well. In particular, regardless of the downsampling factor, the UNet consistently obtained the top results. On the other hand, the SPSR model consistently performed worse. In conclusion, UNet and UNet-MSS achieved overall top performances while RRDB performed relatively poorly compared to the other models.</p>","PeriodicalId":37035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Imaging","volume":"10 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11433164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Nyquist: A Comparative Analysis of 3D Deep Learning Models Enhancing MRI Resolution.\",\"authors\":\"Soumick Chatterjee, Alessandro Sciarra, Max Dünnwald, Anitha Bhat Talagini Ashoka, Mayura Gurjar Cheepinahalli Vasudeva, Shudarsan Saravanan, Venkatesh Thirugnana Sambandham, Pavan Tummala, Steffen Oeltze-Jafra, Oliver Speck, Andreas Nürnberger\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jimaging10090207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>High-spatial resolution MRI produces abundant structural information, enabling highly accurate clinical diagnosis and image-guided therapeutics. However, the acquisition of high-spatial resolution MRI data typically can come at the expense of less spatial coverage, lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and longer scan time due to physical, physiological and hardware limitations. In order to overcome these limitations, super-resolution MRI deep-learning-based techniques can be utilised. In this work, different state-of-the-art 3D convolution neural network models for super resolution (RRDB, SPSR, UNet, UNet-MSS and ShuffleUNet) were compared for the super-resolution task with the goal of finding the best model in terms of performance and robustness. The public IXI dataset (only structural images) was used. Data were artificially downsampled to obtain lower-resolution spatial MRIs (downsampling factor varying from 8 to 64). When assessing performance using the SSIM metric in the test set, all models performed well. In particular, regardless of the downsampling factor, the UNet consistently obtained the top results. On the other hand, the SPSR model consistently performed worse. In conclusion, UNet and UNet-MSS achieved overall top performances while RRDB performed relatively poorly compared to the other models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Imaging\",\"volume\":\"10 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11433164/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging10090207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging10090207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond Nyquist: A Comparative Analysis of 3D Deep Learning Models Enhancing MRI Resolution.
High-spatial resolution MRI produces abundant structural information, enabling highly accurate clinical diagnosis and image-guided therapeutics. However, the acquisition of high-spatial resolution MRI data typically can come at the expense of less spatial coverage, lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and longer scan time due to physical, physiological and hardware limitations. In order to overcome these limitations, super-resolution MRI deep-learning-based techniques can be utilised. In this work, different state-of-the-art 3D convolution neural network models for super resolution (RRDB, SPSR, UNet, UNet-MSS and ShuffleUNet) were compared for the super-resolution task with the goal of finding the best model in terms of performance and robustness. The public IXI dataset (only structural images) was used. Data were artificially downsampled to obtain lower-resolution spatial MRIs (downsampling factor varying from 8 to 64). When assessing performance using the SSIM metric in the test set, all models performed well. In particular, regardless of the downsampling factor, the UNet consistently obtained the top results. On the other hand, the SPSR model consistently performed worse. In conclusion, UNet and UNet-MSS achieved overall top performances while RRDB performed relatively poorly compared to the other models.