精益多囊卵巢综合征患者的诊断经历。

Melissa Masters, Kenlee Dropping, Amie Parry-Jones, Rachel Sinley
{"title":"精益多囊卵巢综合征患者的诊断经历。","authors":"Melissa Masters, Kenlee Dropping, Amie Parry-Jones, Rachel Sinley","doi":"10.1016/j.nwh.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the diagnosis experience in an international sample of people with lean polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study with open-ended questions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 150 people with lean PCOS who met eligibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Measurements/intervention: </strong>An electronic survey was distributed on social media. Survey questions were adapted from previously published research. Categorical data were analyzed as count and proportions. Chi-square tests were used to examine factors associated with diagnosis experience satisfaction. Post hoc analysis was conducted using adjusted standardized residuals. Statistical significance was set at p < .05. Qualitative data were analyzed with an inductive thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 49.0% (n = 72) of participants reported diagnosis experience dissatisfaction, 72.8% (n = 99) disagreed that there is adequate information about lean PCOS, and 80.2% (n = 109) disagreed that health professionals have adequate knowledge about lean PCOS. Significant associations were found between length of time to diagnosis and diagnosis satisfaction (p = .001, χ<sup>2</sup> = 18.133, df = 4, Cramer's V = 0.258) and number of medical professionals seen and diagnosis satisfaction (p < .001, χ<sup>2</sup> = 18.095, df = 2, Cramer's V = 0.362). Main PCOS concerns included irregular menstrual cycles (n = 108, 72.0%), hormone imbalance (n = 97, 64.7%), and anxiety (n = 74, 49.3%). Qualitative analyses revealed that participants received limited PCOS management information and felt providers were dismissive of them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diagnosis experience for people with lean PCOS includes high feelings of dissatisfaction. Opportunities exist to expand education about lean PCOS among students and clinicians, provide quality resources to support lifestyle modification in patients with lean PCOS, and listen to the needs of each individual. Future research should further examine the lean subset of people with PCOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":39985,"journal":{"name":"Nursing for Women''s Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis Experiences in Individuals With Lean Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Masters, Kenlee Dropping, Amie Parry-Jones, Rachel Sinley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nwh.2024.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the diagnosis experience in an international sample of people with lean polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study with open-ended questions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 150 people with lean PCOS who met eligibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Measurements/intervention: </strong>An electronic survey was distributed on social media. Survey questions were adapted from previously published research. Categorical data were analyzed as count and proportions. Chi-square tests were used to examine factors associated with diagnosis experience satisfaction. Post hoc analysis was conducted using adjusted standardized residuals. Statistical significance was set at p < .05. Qualitative data were analyzed with an inductive thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 49.0% (n = 72) of participants reported diagnosis experience dissatisfaction, 72.8% (n = 99) disagreed that there is adequate information about lean PCOS, and 80.2% (n = 109) disagreed that health professionals have adequate knowledge about lean PCOS. Significant associations were found between length of time to diagnosis and diagnosis satisfaction (p = .001, χ<sup>2</sup> = 18.133, df = 4, Cramer's V = 0.258) and number of medical professionals seen and diagnosis satisfaction (p < .001, χ<sup>2</sup> = 18.095, df = 2, Cramer's V = 0.362). Main PCOS concerns included irregular menstrual cycles (n = 108, 72.0%), hormone imbalance (n = 97, 64.7%), and anxiety (n = 74, 49.3%). Qualitative analyses revealed that participants received limited PCOS management information and felt providers were dismissive of them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diagnosis experience for people with lean PCOS includes high feelings of dissatisfaction. Opportunities exist to expand education about lean PCOS among students and clinicians, provide quality resources to support lifestyle modification in patients with lean PCOS, and listen to the needs of each individual. Future research should further examine the lean subset of people with PCOS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing for Women''s Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing for Women''s Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2024.05.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing for Women''s Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2024.05.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究国际样本中多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者的诊断经验:研究瘦型多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者的国际样本诊断经验:设计:采用开放式问题的横断面研究:环境:在线:测量/干预:在社交媒体上发布电子调查问卷。调查问题改编自之前发表的研究。分类数据以计数和比例的形式进行分析。使用卡方检验来检查与诊断体验满意度相关的因素。使用调整后的标准化残差进行事后分析。统计显著性设定为 p 结果:约 49.0%(n = 72)的参与者表示对诊断体验不满意,72.8%(n = 99)的参与者不同意有足够的关于精益型多囊卵巢综合症的信息,80.2%(n = 109)的参与者不同意医疗专业人员有足够的关于精益型多囊卵巢综合症的知识。在诊断时间长短与诊断满意度(p = .001,χ2 = 18.133,df = 4,Cramer's V = 0.258)和就诊医务人员数量与诊断满意度(p < .001,χ2 = 18.095,df = 2,Cramer's V = 0.362)之间存在显著关联。多囊卵巢综合症的主要问题包括月经周期不规律(n = 108,72.0%)、激素失衡(n = 97,64.7%)和焦虑(n = 74,49.3%)。定性分析显示,参与者获得的多囊卵巢综合症管理信息有限,并认为医疗服务提供者对他们不屑一顾:结论:精益型多囊卵巢综合症患者的诊断经历包括高度的不满意感。我们有机会在学生和临床医生中扩大有关精益型多囊卵巢综合症的教育,提供优质资源以支持精益型多囊卵巢综合症患者改变生活方式,并倾听每个人的需求。未来的研究应进一步研究多囊卵巢综合症患者中的精益人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnosis Experiences in Individuals With Lean Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Objective: To examine the diagnosis experience in an international sample of people with lean polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

Design: Cross-sectional study with open-ended questions.

Setting: Online.

Participants: A total of 150 people with lean PCOS who met eligibility criteria.

Measurements/intervention: An electronic survey was distributed on social media. Survey questions were adapted from previously published research. Categorical data were analyzed as count and proportions. Chi-square tests were used to examine factors associated with diagnosis experience satisfaction. Post hoc analysis was conducted using adjusted standardized residuals. Statistical significance was set at p < .05. Qualitative data were analyzed with an inductive thematic approach.

Results: Approximately 49.0% (n = 72) of participants reported diagnosis experience dissatisfaction, 72.8% (n = 99) disagreed that there is adequate information about lean PCOS, and 80.2% (n = 109) disagreed that health professionals have adequate knowledge about lean PCOS. Significant associations were found between length of time to diagnosis and diagnosis satisfaction (p = .001, χ2 = 18.133, df = 4, Cramer's V = 0.258) and number of medical professionals seen and diagnosis satisfaction (p < .001, χ2 = 18.095, df = 2, Cramer's V = 0.362). Main PCOS concerns included irregular menstrual cycles (n = 108, 72.0%), hormone imbalance (n = 97, 64.7%), and anxiety (n = 74, 49.3%). Qualitative analyses revealed that participants received limited PCOS management information and felt providers were dismissive of them.

Conclusion: The diagnosis experience for people with lean PCOS includes high feelings of dissatisfaction. Opportunities exist to expand education about lean PCOS among students and clinicians, provide quality resources to support lifestyle modification in patients with lean PCOS, and listen to the needs of each individual. Future research should further examine the lean subset of people with PCOS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing for Women''s Health
Nursing for Women''s Health Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Nursing for Women"s Health publishes the most recent and compelling health care information on women"s health, newborn care and professional nursing issues. As a refereed, clinical practice journal, it provides professionals involved in providing optimum nursing care for women and their newborns with health care trends and everyday issues in a concise, practical, and easy-to-read format.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Screening Women for Intimate Partner Violence Among Health Care Providers in Thailand. A Guide to Successfully Publishing a Clinical Practice Manuscript. Evaluation of a Menstrual Hygiene Education Program for Adolescent Girls in Rural India. The Experiences of Pregnancy Among Adolescent Girls in Jordan. Implementation of Genetic Carrier Screening at Gynecologic-Related Visits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1