双特异性 FpFs:临床前抗体开发的多功能工具。

IF 4.2 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY RSC Chemical Biology Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1039/D4CB00130C
Matthew Collins, Nkiru Ibeanu, Wiktoria Roksana Grabowska, Sahar Awwad, Peng T. Khaw, Steve Brocchini and Hanieh Khalili
{"title":"双特异性 FpFs:临床前抗体开发的多功能工具。","authors":"Matthew Collins, Nkiru Ibeanu, Wiktoria Roksana Grabowska, Sahar Awwad, Peng T. Khaw, Steve Brocchini and Hanieh Khalili","doi":"10.1039/D4CB00130C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >We previously described FpFs <strong><img></strong> (Fab–PEG–Fab) as binding mimetics of IgGs. FpFs are prepared with di(bis-sulfone) conjugation reagents <strong><img></strong> that undergo disulfide rebridging conjugation with the accessible disulfide of each Fab (Scheme 1). We have now prepared bispecific FpFs <strong><img></strong> (bsFpF and Fab<small><sub>1</sub></small>–PEG–Fab<small><sub>2</sub></small>) as potential bispecific antibody mimetics with the intent that bsFpFs could be used in preclinical antibody development since sourcing bispecific antibodies may be challenging during preclinical research. The di(bis-sulfone) reagent <strong><img></strong> was first used to prepare a bsFpF <strong><img></strong> by the sequential conjugation of a first Fab and then a second Fab to another target (Scheme 2). Seeking to improve bsFpF synthesis, the asymmetric conjugation reagent, bis-sulfone bis-sulfide <strong><img><img>,</strong> with different thiol conjugation reactivities at each terminus (Scheme 4) was examined and the bsFpFs appeared to be formed at similar conversion to the di(bis-sulfone) reagent <strong><img></strong>. To explore the advantages of using common intermediates in the preparation of bsFpF families, we investigated bsFpF synthesis with a protein conjugation–ligation approach (Scheme 5). Reagents with a bis-sulfone moiety for conjugation on one PEG terminus and a ligation moiety on the other terminus were examined. Bis-sulfone PEG <em>trans</em>-cyclooctene (TCO) <strong><img><img></strong> and bis-sulfone PEG tetrazine (Tz) <strong><img><img></strong> were used to prepare several bsFpFs targeting various therapeutic targets (TNF-α, IL6R, IL17, and VEGF) and tissue affinity targets (hyaluronic acid and collagen II). Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) binding studies indicated that there was little difference between the dissociation rate constant (<em>k</em><small><sub>d</sub></small>) for the unmodified Fab, mono-conjugated PEG–Fab and the corresponding Fab in a bsFpF. The Fab association rate (<em>k</em><small><sub>a</sub></small>) in the bsFpF was slower than for PEG–Fab, which may be because of mass differences that influence SPR results. These observations suggest that each Fab will bind to its target independently of the other Fab and that bsFpF binding profiles can be estimated using the corresponding PEG–Fab conjugates.</p>","PeriodicalId":40691,"journal":{"name":"RSC Chemical Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bispecific FpFs: a versatile tool for preclinical antibody development†\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Collins, Nkiru Ibeanu, Wiktoria Roksana Grabowska, Sahar Awwad, Peng T. Khaw, Steve Brocchini and Hanieh Khalili\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4CB00130C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >We previously described FpFs <strong><img></strong> (Fab–PEG–Fab) as binding mimetics of IgGs. FpFs are prepared with di(bis-sulfone) conjugation reagents <strong><img></strong> that undergo disulfide rebridging conjugation with the accessible disulfide of each Fab (Scheme 1). We have now prepared bispecific FpFs <strong><img></strong> (bsFpF and Fab<small><sub>1</sub></small>–PEG–Fab<small><sub>2</sub></small>) as potential bispecific antibody mimetics with the intent that bsFpFs could be used in preclinical antibody development since sourcing bispecific antibodies may be challenging during preclinical research. The di(bis-sulfone) reagent <strong><img></strong> was first used to prepare a bsFpF <strong><img></strong> by the sequential conjugation of a first Fab and then a second Fab to another target (Scheme 2). Seeking to improve bsFpF synthesis, the asymmetric conjugation reagent, bis-sulfone bis-sulfide <strong><img><img>,</strong> with different thiol conjugation reactivities at each terminus (Scheme 4) was examined and the bsFpFs appeared to be formed at similar conversion to the di(bis-sulfone) reagent <strong><img></strong>. To explore the advantages of using common intermediates in the preparation of bsFpF families, we investigated bsFpF synthesis with a protein conjugation–ligation approach (Scheme 5). Reagents with a bis-sulfone moiety for conjugation on one PEG terminus and a ligation moiety on the other terminus were examined. Bis-sulfone PEG <em>trans</em>-cyclooctene (TCO) <strong><img><img></strong> and bis-sulfone PEG tetrazine (Tz) <strong><img><img></strong> were used to prepare several bsFpFs targeting various therapeutic targets (TNF-α, IL6R, IL17, and VEGF) and tissue affinity targets (hyaluronic acid and collagen II). Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) binding studies indicated that there was little difference between the dissociation rate constant (<em>k</em><small><sub>d</sub></small>) for the unmodified Fab, mono-conjugated PEG–Fab and the corresponding Fab in a bsFpF. The Fab association rate (<em>k</em><small><sub>a</sub></small>) in the bsFpF was slower than for PEG–Fab, which may be because of mass differences that influence SPR results. These observations suggest that each Fab will bind to its target independently of the other Fab and that bsFpF binding profiles can be estimated using the corresponding PEG–Fab conjugates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RSC Chemical Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427889/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RSC Chemical Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/cb/d4cb00130c\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC Chemical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/cb/d4cb00130c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们以前曾将 FpFs 1̲(Fab-PEG-Fab)描述为 IgG 的结合模拟物。FpFs 是用二(双砜)共轭试剂 3̲制备的,这种试剂会与每个 Fab 的可触及二硫化物发生二硫重桥共轭(方案 1)。我们现在制备了双特异性 FpFs 2̲(bsFpF 和 Fab1-PEG-Fab2),作为潜在的双特异性抗体模拟物,目的是将 bsFpFs 用于临床前抗体开发,因为在临床前研究中寻找双特异性抗体可能具有挑战性。二(双砜)试剂 3̲首先用于制备 bsFpF 2̲,方法是先将第一个 Fab 然后将第二个 Fab 顺序连接到另一个靶点(方案 2)。为了改进 bsFpF 的合成,我们研究了不对称共轭试剂双砜双硫醚 1̲6̲,其每个末端的硫醇共轭反应活性不同(方案 4)。为了探索在制备 bsFpF 家族时使用普通中间体的优势,我们研究了用蛋白质共轭-连接方法合成 bsFpF(方案 5)。我们研究了在 PEG 的一个末端带有用于共轭的双砜基,而在另一个末端带有连接基的试剂。双砜基 PEG 反环辛烯(TCO)2̲8̲ 和双砜基 PEG 四嗪(Tz)3̲0̲ 被用来制备针对各种治疗靶点(TNF-α、IL6R、IL17 和 VEGF)和组织亲和性靶点(透明质酸和胶原蛋白 II)的多种 bsFpF。表面等离子共振(SPR)结合研究表明,未修饰的 Fab、单共轭 PEG-Fab 和 bsFpF 中相应 Fab 的解离速率常数(k d)差别不大。bsFpF中的Fab结合速率(k a)比PEG-Fab慢,这可能是因为质量差异影响了SPR结果。这些观察结果表明,每种 Fab 都会独立于其他 Fab 与靶标结合,因此可以使用相应的 PEG-Fab 共轭物来估计 bsFpF 的结合曲线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bispecific FpFs: a versatile tool for preclinical antibody development†

We previously described FpFs (Fab–PEG–Fab) as binding mimetics of IgGs. FpFs are prepared with di(bis-sulfone) conjugation reagents that undergo disulfide rebridging conjugation with the accessible disulfide of each Fab (Scheme 1). We have now prepared bispecific FpFs (bsFpF and Fab1–PEG–Fab2) as potential bispecific antibody mimetics with the intent that bsFpFs could be used in preclinical antibody development since sourcing bispecific antibodies may be challenging during preclinical research. The di(bis-sulfone) reagent was first used to prepare a bsFpF by the sequential conjugation of a first Fab and then a second Fab to another target (Scheme 2). Seeking to improve bsFpF synthesis, the asymmetric conjugation reagent, bis-sulfone bis-sulfide , with different thiol conjugation reactivities at each terminus (Scheme 4) was examined and the bsFpFs appeared to be formed at similar conversion to the di(bis-sulfone) reagent . To explore the advantages of using common intermediates in the preparation of bsFpF families, we investigated bsFpF synthesis with a protein conjugation–ligation approach (Scheme 5). Reagents with a bis-sulfone moiety for conjugation on one PEG terminus and a ligation moiety on the other terminus were examined. Bis-sulfone PEG trans-cyclooctene (TCO) and bis-sulfone PEG tetrazine (Tz) were used to prepare several bsFpFs targeting various therapeutic targets (TNF-α, IL6R, IL17, and VEGF) and tissue affinity targets (hyaluronic acid and collagen II). Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) binding studies indicated that there was little difference between the dissociation rate constant (kd) for the unmodified Fab, mono-conjugated PEG–Fab and the corresponding Fab in a bsFpF. The Fab association rate (ka) in the bsFpF was slower than for PEG–Fab, which may be because of mass differences that influence SPR results. These observations suggest that each Fab will bind to its target independently of the other Fab and that bsFpF binding profiles can be estimated using the corresponding PEG–Fab conjugates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Back cover Sequence-function space of radical SAM cyclophane synthases reveal conserved active site residues that influence substrate specificity. Induced degradation of SNAP-fusion proteins. Fluorescent probes for investigating the internalisation and action of bioorthogonal ruthenium catalysts within Gram-positive bacteria. Discovery and design of molecular glue enhancers of CDK12-DDB1 interactions for targeted degradation of cyclin K.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1