Jared E Gurba, Nomi S Weiss-Laxer, Mohammad N Haider, John M Marzo
{"title":"内侧半月板根部撕裂修复术与其他内侧半月板修复术后的患者报告结果:单臂队列的探索性 Meta 分析。","authors":"Jared E Gurba, Nomi S Weiss-Laxer, Mohammad N Haider, John M Marzo","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to (1) compare patient-reported outcome measures between patients who underwent medial meniscus root tear (MMRT) repair and those who underwent other types of medial meniscus repair, and (2) identify factors associated with observed differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search identified studies reporting PROMs-knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) or visual analog scale (VAS) for pain-after repair of the medial meniscus. Studies were excluded if outcomes were not separated by tear type or reported graphically, different or no outcomes reported, no repair or repair with a sutureless method, follow-up greater than 72 months, case report, and systematic review. Patient-reported outcome measures and demographics were summarized as sample-weighted means and compared using t-tests. Mixed model linear regressions were fit predicting postoperative PROMs adjusted for tear type, preoperative PROMs, and follow-up time. F statistics of type III tests of fixed effects were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen articles were included, n = 10 received MMRT repair and n = 8 other tear repairs. Postoperative values for all KOOS scores were less for the MMRT repair group compared with the other tear repair group, VAS pain was not statistically different. Tear type was a stronger predictor for postoperative PROMs than the preoperative score and duration of follow-up for all KOOS scores, but not VAS pain. On average, the MMRT repair group had shorter follow-up, more women, older age, and greater BMI.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>All postoperative PROMs except for VAS pain were worse for patients who underwent MMRT repair compared with patients who underwent other types of medial meniscus repair. Tear type was a better predictor of postoperative PROMs despite intergroup differences in preoperative PROMs and duration of follow-up. Relative risk factors for MMRT compared with other types of medial meniscus tears include older age, greater BMI, and female sex.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"8 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-reported Outcomes After Medial Meniscus Root Tear Repair Versus Other Medial Meniscus Repairs: An Exploratory Meta-analysis of Single-arm Cohorts.\",\"authors\":\"Jared E Gurba, Nomi S Weiss-Laxer, Mohammad N Haider, John M Marzo\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to (1) compare patient-reported outcome measures between patients who underwent medial meniscus root tear (MMRT) repair and those who underwent other types of medial meniscus repair, and (2) identify factors associated with observed differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search identified studies reporting PROMs-knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) or visual analog scale (VAS) for pain-after repair of the medial meniscus. Studies were excluded if outcomes were not separated by tear type or reported graphically, different or no outcomes reported, no repair or repair with a sutureless method, follow-up greater than 72 months, case report, and systematic review. Patient-reported outcome measures and demographics were summarized as sample-weighted means and compared using t-tests. Mixed model linear regressions were fit predicting postoperative PROMs adjusted for tear type, preoperative PROMs, and follow-up time. F statistics of type III tests of fixed effects were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen articles were included, n = 10 received MMRT repair and n = 8 other tear repairs. Postoperative values for all KOOS scores were less for the MMRT repair group compared with the other tear repair group, VAS pain was not statistically different. Tear type was a stronger predictor for postoperative PROMs than the preoperative score and duration of follow-up for all KOOS scores, but not VAS pain. On average, the MMRT repair group had shorter follow-up, more women, older age, and greater BMI.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>All postoperative PROMs except for VAS pain were worse for patients who underwent MMRT repair compared with patients who underwent other types of medial meniscus repair. Tear type was a better predictor of postoperative PROMs despite intergroup differences in preoperative PROMs and duration of follow-up. Relative risk factors for MMRT compared with other types of medial meniscus tears include older age, greater BMI, and female sex.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"8 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427035/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:本研究旨在(1)比较接受内侧半月板根撕裂(MMRT)修复术的患者与接受其他类型内侧半月板修复术的患者的患者报告结果指标;(2)确定与观察到的差异相关的因素:方法:通过文献检索确定了报告内侧半月板修复术后PROM--膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)或疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)的研究。如果研究结果未按撕裂类型分列或以图表形式报告、报告结果不同或未报告、未进行修复或采用无缝合方法修复、随访时间超过 72 个月、病例报告以及系统性综述,则排除这些研究。患者报告的结果指标和人口统计学特征以样本加权平均值进行总结,并使用t检验进行比较。根据撕裂类型、术前 PROMs 和随访时间对术后 PROMs 进行混合线性回归预测。比较了固定效应 III 型检验的 F 统计量:共纳入 18 篇文章,其中 10 篇接受了 MMRT 修复术,8 篇接受了其他撕裂修复术。与其他撕裂修复组相比,MMRT修复组的术后KOOS评分均较低,VAS疼痛无统计学差异。就所有 KOOS 评分而言,与术前评分和随访时间相比,撕裂类型对术后 PROMs 的预测作用更强,但对 VAS 疼痛的预测作用则不强。平均而言,MMRT修复组的随访时间更短、女性更多、年龄更大、体重指数更高:讨论:与接受其他类型内侧半月板修复术的患者相比,接受MMRT修复术的患者除VAS疼痛外,其他术后PROM均较差。尽管组间在术前 PROMs 和随访时间上存在差异,但撕裂类型更能预测术后 PROMs。与其他类型的内侧半月板撕裂相比,MMRT 的相对风险因素包括年龄较大、体重指数较高和女性。
Patient-reported Outcomes After Medial Meniscus Root Tear Repair Versus Other Medial Meniscus Repairs: An Exploratory Meta-analysis of Single-arm Cohorts.
Introduction: This study aimed to (1) compare patient-reported outcome measures between patients who underwent medial meniscus root tear (MMRT) repair and those who underwent other types of medial meniscus repair, and (2) identify factors associated with observed differences.
Methods: A literature search identified studies reporting PROMs-knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) or visual analog scale (VAS) for pain-after repair of the medial meniscus. Studies were excluded if outcomes were not separated by tear type or reported graphically, different or no outcomes reported, no repair or repair with a sutureless method, follow-up greater than 72 months, case report, and systematic review. Patient-reported outcome measures and demographics were summarized as sample-weighted means and compared using t-tests. Mixed model linear regressions were fit predicting postoperative PROMs adjusted for tear type, preoperative PROMs, and follow-up time. F statistics of type III tests of fixed effects were compared.
Results: Eighteen articles were included, n = 10 received MMRT repair and n = 8 other tear repairs. Postoperative values for all KOOS scores were less for the MMRT repair group compared with the other tear repair group, VAS pain was not statistically different. Tear type was a stronger predictor for postoperative PROMs than the preoperative score and duration of follow-up for all KOOS scores, but not VAS pain. On average, the MMRT repair group had shorter follow-up, more women, older age, and greater BMI.
Discussion: All postoperative PROMs except for VAS pain were worse for patients who underwent MMRT repair compared with patients who underwent other types of medial meniscus repair. Tear type was a better predictor of postoperative PROMs despite intergroup differences in preoperative PROMs and duration of follow-up. Relative risk factors for MMRT compared with other types of medial meniscus tears include older age, greater BMI, and female sex.