孩子不只是小大人:尝试验证基于平板电脑的儿科数字噪音测试。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1002/lio2.70001
Allyson Dunlap BS, Morgan McBride BS, Alison Tuominen BS, Brianne Roby MD, Andrew Redmann MD, Abby Meyer MD MPH, Hannah Herd AuD, Cassandra Meyer PhD, Sivakumar Chinnadurai MD MPH, Michael Finch PhD, Asitha D. L. Jayawardena MD MPH
{"title":"孩子不只是小大人:尝试验证基于平板电脑的儿科数字噪音测试。","authors":"Allyson Dunlap BS,&nbsp;Morgan McBride BS,&nbsp;Alison Tuominen BS,&nbsp;Brianne Roby MD,&nbsp;Andrew Redmann MD,&nbsp;Abby Meyer MD MPH,&nbsp;Hannah Herd AuD,&nbsp;Cassandra Meyer PhD,&nbsp;Sivakumar Chinnadurai MD MPH,&nbsp;Michael Finch PhD,&nbsp;Asitha D. L. Jayawardena MD MPH","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study is to investigate whether conductive hearing loss (CHL) can be differentiated from sensorineural hearing loss in children ages 3–18 using a diotic and antiphasic digits-in-noise (DIN) tablet-based test using existing adult cut-off criteria.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A blinded multi-institutional prospective cohort of 64 children aged 3–18 scheduled for an audiometric soundbooth evaluation with a pediatric audiologist and a same-day otolaryngologist examination were recruited for the study. Following a conventional audiogram, the subjects underwent diotic (same-phased stimuli) and antiphasic (out-of-phase stimuli) DIN testing on a HearX Samsung Galaxy tablet with over-the-ear headphones, for a total of 128 measurements. DIN test results were compared with soundbooth audiometry using known adult “cut off criteria.”</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A logistic regression analysis adjusted for demographics (age, sex) and race was performed to compare CHL determination from DIN testing to CHL determination with soundbooth audiometry. The results showed 50% agreement with a <i>p</i>-value of .753. The determinations based on combined DIN testing agreed with each other 33% of the time and had a <i>p</i>-value of .373. Otologic pathology and age were not predictive of outcome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This preliminary analysis of DIN testing indicated that DIN and audiometric testing completed in a soundbooth were not significantly predictive of one another in the population of children aged 3–18 when using the adult cut-off criteria for CHL differentiation. Given these findings, further testing is required in children to determine pediatric specific cut-off values.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11437514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kids are not just small adults: An attempt to validate pediatric tablet-based digits in noise testing\",\"authors\":\"Allyson Dunlap BS,&nbsp;Morgan McBride BS,&nbsp;Alison Tuominen BS,&nbsp;Brianne Roby MD,&nbsp;Andrew Redmann MD,&nbsp;Abby Meyer MD MPH,&nbsp;Hannah Herd AuD,&nbsp;Cassandra Meyer PhD,&nbsp;Sivakumar Chinnadurai MD MPH,&nbsp;Michael Finch PhD,&nbsp;Asitha D. L. Jayawardena MD MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lio2.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The objective of this study is to investigate whether conductive hearing loss (CHL) can be differentiated from sensorineural hearing loss in children ages 3–18 using a diotic and antiphasic digits-in-noise (DIN) tablet-based test using existing adult cut-off criteria.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A blinded multi-institutional prospective cohort of 64 children aged 3–18 scheduled for an audiometric soundbooth evaluation with a pediatric audiologist and a same-day otolaryngologist examination were recruited for the study. Following a conventional audiogram, the subjects underwent diotic (same-phased stimuli) and antiphasic (out-of-phase stimuli) DIN testing on a HearX Samsung Galaxy tablet with over-the-ear headphones, for a total of 128 measurements. DIN test results were compared with soundbooth audiometry using known adult “cut off criteria.”</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A logistic regression analysis adjusted for demographics (age, sex) and race was performed to compare CHL determination from DIN testing to CHL determination with soundbooth audiometry. The results showed 50% agreement with a <i>p</i>-value of .753. The determinations based on combined DIN testing agreed with each other 33% of the time and had a <i>p</i>-value of .373. Otologic pathology and age were not predictive of outcome.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This preliminary analysis of DIN testing indicated that DIN and audiometric testing completed in a soundbooth were not significantly predictive of one another in the population of children aged 3–18 when using the adult cut-off criteria for CHL differentiation. Given these findings, further testing is required in children to determine pediatric specific cut-off values.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11437514/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究的目的是调查在 3-18 岁儿童中,传导性听力损失(CHL)与感音神经性听力损失是否可以通过使用基于平板电脑的噪声中两位数和反相位(DIN)测试来区分,并采用现有的成人分界标准:本研究招募了64名3-18岁的儿童,这些儿童均为盲人,计划由儿科听力学家进行听力声室评估,并在当天接受耳鼻喉科医生的检查。在进行常规听力图检查后,受试者使用 HearX Samsung Galaxy 平板电脑和耳罩式耳机进行顺相(同相刺激)和逆相(失相刺激)DIN 测试,共进行 128 次测量。使用已知的成人 "截断标准 "将 DIN 测试结果与声波室测听仪进行比较:对人口统计学(年龄、性别)和种族进行了逻辑回归分析,以比较 DIN 测试与声波听力测定的 CHL 测定结果。结果显示,两者的一致性为 50%,P 值为 0.753。根据综合 DIN 测试确定的结果有 33% 的时间是一致的,P 值为 0.373。耳部病理和年龄对结果没有预测作用:对 DIN 测试的初步分析表明,在 3-18 岁的儿童群体中,当使用成人的 CHL 分界标准时,DIN 和在声箱内完成的听力测试对彼此的预测作用并不明显。鉴于这些发现,需要对儿童进行进一步测试,以确定儿童特定的临界值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kids are not just small adults: An attempt to validate pediatric tablet-based digits in noise testing

Objective

The objective of this study is to investigate whether conductive hearing loss (CHL) can be differentiated from sensorineural hearing loss in children ages 3–18 using a diotic and antiphasic digits-in-noise (DIN) tablet-based test using existing adult cut-off criteria.

Methods

A blinded multi-institutional prospective cohort of 64 children aged 3–18 scheduled for an audiometric soundbooth evaluation with a pediatric audiologist and a same-day otolaryngologist examination were recruited for the study. Following a conventional audiogram, the subjects underwent diotic (same-phased stimuli) and antiphasic (out-of-phase stimuli) DIN testing on a HearX Samsung Galaxy tablet with over-the-ear headphones, for a total of 128 measurements. DIN test results were compared with soundbooth audiometry using known adult “cut off criteria.”

Results

A logistic regression analysis adjusted for demographics (age, sex) and race was performed to compare CHL determination from DIN testing to CHL determination with soundbooth audiometry. The results showed 50% agreement with a p-value of .753. The determinations based on combined DIN testing agreed with each other 33% of the time and had a p-value of .373. Otologic pathology and age were not predictive of outcome.

Conclusion

This preliminary analysis of DIN testing indicated that DIN and audiometric testing completed in a soundbooth were not significantly predictive of one another in the population of children aged 3–18 when using the adult cut-off criteria for CHL differentiation. Given these findings, further testing is required in children to determine pediatric specific cut-off values.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
A MAUDE database analysis on the new generation of active bone conduction hearing implants Histological characterization of rat vocal fold across different postnatal periods Kids are not just small adults: An attempt to validate pediatric tablet-based digits in noise testing Outcomes of heliox use in children with respiratory compromise: A 10-year single institution experience As a phenomenon: Ramadan fasting improves olfactory performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1