Timothy P. Cheung DPM, PhD, CPT , Khanh Phuong S. Tong DPM , Shanay Fischer DPM , Kayla Obradovic DPM, MS , Norman Wortzman DPM, FACPM, DABPM , Adam S. Landsman DPM, PhD, FACFAS
{"title":"在短期随访中,第一跖趾关节假体关节置换术与第一跖趾关节置换术可缩小第一跖间角","authors":"Timothy P. Cheung DPM, PhD, CPT , Khanh Phuong S. Tong DPM , Shanay Fischer DPM , Kayla Obradovic DPM, MS , Norman Wortzman DPM, FACPM, DABPM , Adam S. Landsman DPM, PhD, FACFAS","doi":"10.1016/j.fastrc.2024.100430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the presence of hallux limitus/rigidus and an elevated 1–2 intermetatarsal angle (IMA), first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis (FUSION) is often chosen to simultaneously correct both issues; however, this procedure obliterates the first MTPJ function and can often shorten the first ray. Alternatively, the first MTPJ implant arthroplasty (IMPLANT) has the ability to preserve some motion at the joint and does not result in shortening. Despite its surgical utility in clinical restoration, there is a paucity of understanding surrounding the first MTPJ arthroplasty's effect on the IMA. To this end, we performed a retrospective cohort study comparing the changes in IMA in patients that received either a first MTPJ IMPLANT or first MTPJ FUSION at our institution between January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2021. Weightbearing AP films preoperatively and during the immediate (i.e., 4–8 weeks) postoperative period were used to evaluate changes in IMA. We identified 49 patients (20 IMPLANT, 29 FUSION). The IMA was reduced in patients that received FUSION (<em>P</em> < 0.0001) or IMPLANT (<em>P</em> < 0.0001). Surprisingly, we found that the amount of IMA reduction was similar in both groups. Therefore, we conclude that IMPLANT procedures reduce the IMA comparable to FUSION procedures during the immediate postoperative period. Moreover, the results of our work challenges the previous notions of adductor hallucis tendon involvement in IMA reduction in FUSION procedures.</div><div><strong>Level of Clinical Evidence:</strong> IV, retrospective case series</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73047,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100430"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First metatarsophalangeal joint implant arthroplasty reduces the first intermetatarsal angle similar to first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis in short-term follow up\",\"authors\":\"Timothy P. Cheung DPM, PhD, CPT , Khanh Phuong S. Tong DPM , Shanay Fischer DPM , Kayla Obradovic DPM, MS , Norman Wortzman DPM, FACPM, DABPM , Adam S. Landsman DPM, PhD, FACFAS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fastrc.2024.100430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the presence of hallux limitus/rigidus and an elevated 1–2 intermetatarsal angle (IMA), first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis (FUSION) is often chosen to simultaneously correct both issues; however, this procedure obliterates the first MTPJ function and can often shorten the first ray. Alternatively, the first MTPJ implant arthroplasty (IMPLANT) has the ability to preserve some motion at the joint and does not result in shortening. Despite its surgical utility in clinical restoration, there is a paucity of understanding surrounding the first MTPJ arthroplasty's effect on the IMA. To this end, we performed a retrospective cohort study comparing the changes in IMA in patients that received either a first MTPJ IMPLANT or first MTPJ FUSION at our institution between January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2021. Weightbearing AP films preoperatively and during the immediate (i.e., 4–8 weeks) postoperative period were used to evaluate changes in IMA. We identified 49 patients (20 IMPLANT, 29 FUSION). The IMA was reduced in patients that received FUSION (<em>P</em> < 0.0001) or IMPLANT (<em>P</em> < 0.0001). Surprisingly, we found that the amount of IMA reduction was similar in both groups. Therefore, we conclude that IMPLANT procedures reduce the IMA comparable to FUSION procedures during the immediate postoperative period. Moreover, the results of our work challenges the previous notions of adductor hallucis tendon involvement in IMA reduction in FUSION procedures.</div><div><strong>Level of Clinical Evidence:</strong> IV, retrospective case series</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000703\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在存在拇指外翻/内翻和1-2跖骨间角(IMA)增高的情况下,通常会选择第一跖趾关节(MTPJ)关节固定术(FUSION)来同时矫正这两个问题。另外,第一 MTPJ 植入关节成形术(IMPLANT)能够保留关节的部分运动,并且不会导致缩短。尽管第一 MTPJ 关节成形术在临床修复中非常有用,但人们对其对 IMA 的影响了解甚少。为此,我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,比较了 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间在我院接受首次 MTPJ IMPLANT 或首次 MTPJ FUSION 的患者的 IMA 变化情况。术前和术后近期(即 4-8 周)的负重 AP 片用于评估 IMA 的变化。我们确定了 49 例患者(20 例植入式,29 例融合式)。接受 FUSION(P < 0.0001)或 IMPLANT(P < 0.0001)治疗的患者 IMA 有所减少。令人惊讶的是,我们发现两组患者的 IMA 减少量相似。因此,我们得出结论:在术后初期,IMPLANT 手术与 FUSION 手术相比可减少 IMA。此外,我们的研究结果还对以往认为 FUSION 手术中 IMA 的缩小涉及内收肌腱的观点提出了质疑:IV,回顾性病例系列
First metatarsophalangeal joint implant arthroplasty reduces the first intermetatarsal angle similar to first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis in short-term follow up
In the presence of hallux limitus/rigidus and an elevated 1–2 intermetatarsal angle (IMA), first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis (FUSION) is often chosen to simultaneously correct both issues; however, this procedure obliterates the first MTPJ function and can often shorten the first ray. Alternatively, the first MTPJ implant arthroplasty (IMPLANT) has the ability to preserve some motion at the joint and does not result in shortening. Despite its surgical utility in clinical restoration, there is a paucity of understanding surrounding the first MTPJ arthroplasty's effect on the IMA. To this end, we performed a retrospective cohort study comparing the changes in IMA in patients that received either a first MTPJ IMPLANT or first MTPJ FUSION at our institution between January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2021. Weightbearing AP films preoperatively and during the immediate (i.e., 4–8 weeks) postoperative period were used to evaluate changes in IMA. We identified 49 patients (20 IMPLANT, 29 FUSION). The IMA was reduced in patients that received FUSION (P < 0.0001) or IMPLANT (P < 0.0001). Surprisingly, we found that the amount of IMA reduction was similar in both groups. Therefore, we conclude that IMPLANT procedures reduce the IMA comparable to FUSION procedures during the immediate postoperative period. Moreover, the results of our work challenges the previous notions of adductor hallucis tendon involvement in IMA reduction in FUSION procedures.
Level of Clinical Evidence: IV, retrospective case series