{"title":"在一个成人非医用大麻合法化州的大型多中心队列中,骨转移癌症患者使用大麻和阿片类药物之间的关系","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>Patients with cancer who use cannabis frequently note pain as a reason for their cannabis use. Available data do support cannabis use for management of pain in some settings, though the effectiveness of cannabis for cancer-associated pain is less clear. Based on limited data, some have suggested that cannabis might be used as an alternative to opiates for management of cancer-related pain. We sought to determine the relationship between cannabis use and opioid use in a multicenter cohort of patients undergoing radiotherapy for bone metastases.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>On January 1, 2021, questions about cannabis use were added to Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium (MROQC) questionnaires for bone metastasis patients. Pain scores, opioid use, social, demographic, and disease characteristics were also prospectively collected. A multivariable model using logistic regression identified associations between recent cannabis use and opioid use, accounting for relevant patient and disease characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Since questions on cannabis were introduced, 2,096 patients have been enrolled. A total of 1143 of 2096 (54.5%) completed questionnaires about recent cannabis use; 1912 of 2096 (91%) completed questionnaires about current opioid use; and 1064 of 2096 (51%) completed both. Among those who completed both, 132 of 1064 (12%) reported recent opioid and cannabis use, 320 of 1064 (30%) reported recent opioid but not cannabis use, 57 of 1064 (5%) reported no recent opioid but recent cannabis use, 281 of 1064 (26%) reported no recent opioid or cannabis use, and the remaining individuals (274/1064 [26%]) declined to answer cannabis use questions by selecting “decline to answer”. In a multivariable model, cannabis use [OR = 2.11 (95% CI = 1.37, 3.26) <em>P</em> = 0.001], along with pain score [Score 1-3 vs 0, OR = 2.32 (95% CI = 1.36, 3.94); Score 4-7 vs 0, OR = 6.55 (95% CI = 4.06, 10.6); Score 8-10 vs 0, OR = 11.20 (95% CI = 6.32, 19.8), <em>P</em> < 0.001], NSAID use [OR = 1.66 (95% CI = 1.17, 2.37) <em>P</em> = 0.005], prior systemic therapy [OR = 0.54 (95% CI = 0.37, 0.78) <em>P</em> = 0.005], and number of metastatic lesions [3-5 vs 1-2, OR = 1.57 (95% CI = 0.95, 2.26); 5-10 vs 1-2, OR = 1.54 (95% CI = 0.91, 2.59); 11+ vs 1-2, OR = 3.26 (95% CI = 2.06, 5.15) <em>P</em> < 0.001] predicted opiate use while age, gender, and race did not.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with bone metastases frequently use cannabis, opioids, or both. Though it has been suggested that cannabis availability might reduce opioid use among patients with cancer, our finding that cannabis use predicts opioid use does not support this hypothesis. These data suggest a more complex relationship between cannabis use and opioid use in this population. Further study is needed to assess risks of concurrent cannabis and opioid use and to explore patient rationale for concurrent usage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between Cannabis Use and Opioid Use in Patients with Cancer Metastatic to Bone in a Large Multicenter Cohort from a State with Legalized Adult Non-Medical Cannabis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>Patients with cancer who use cannabis frequently note pain as a reason for their cannabis use. Available data do support cannabis use for management of pain in some settings, though the effectiveness of cannabis for cancer-associated pain is less clear. Based on limited data, some have suggested that cannabis might be used as an alternative to opiates for management of cancer-related pain. We sought to determine the relationship between cannabis use and opioid use in a multicenter cohort of patients undergoing radiotherapy for bone metastases.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>On January 1, 2021, questions about cannabis use were added to Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium (MROQC) questionnaires for bone metastasis patients. Pain scores, opioid use, social, demographic, and disease characteristics were also prospectively collected. A multivariable model using logistic regression identified associations between recent cannabis use and opioid use, accounting for relevant patient and disease characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Since questions on cannabis were introduced, 2,096 patients have been enrolled. A total of 1143 of 2096 (54.5%) completed questionnaires about recent cannabis use; 1912 of 2096 (91%) completed questionnaires about current opioid use; and 1064 of 2096 (51%) completed both. Among those who completed both, 132 of 1064 (12%) reported recent opioid and cannabis use, 320 of 1064 (30%) reported recent opioid but not cannabis use, 57 of 1064 (5%) reported no recent opioid but recent cannabis use, 281 of 1064 (26%) reported no recent opioid or cannabis use, and the remaining individuals (274/1064 [26%]) declined to answer cannabis use questions by selecting “decline to answer”. In a multivariable model, cannabis use [OR = 2.11 (95% CI = 1.37, 3.26) <em>P</em> = 0.001], along with pain score [Score 1-3 vs 0, OR = 2.32 (95% CI = 1.36, 3.94); Score 4-7 vs 0, OR = 6.55 (95% CI = 4.06, 10.6); Score 8-10 vs 0, OR = 11.20 (95% CI = 6.32, 19.8), <em>P</em> < 0.001], NSAID use [OR = 1.66 (95% CI = 1.17, 2.37) <em>P</em> = 0.005], prior systemic therapy [OR = 0.54 (95% CI = 0.37, 0.78) <em>P</em> = 0.005], and number of metastatic lesions [3-5 vs 1-2, OR = 1.57 (95% CI = 0.95, 2.26); 5-10 vs 1-2, OR = 1.54 (95% CI = 0.91, 2.59); 11+ vs 1-2, OR = 3.26 (95% CI = 2.06, 5.15) <em>P</em> < 0.001] predicted opiate use while age, gender, and race did not.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with bone metastases frequently use cannabis, opioids, or both. Though it has been suggested that cannabis availability might reduce opioid use among patients with cancer, our finding that cannabis use predicts opioid use does not support this hypothesis. These data suggest a more complex relationship between cannabis use and opioid use in this population. Further study is needed to assess risks of concurrent cannabis and opioid use and to explore patient rationale for concurrent usage.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624007971\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624007971","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的/目标:使用大麻的癌症患者经常将疼痛作为使用大麻的一个原因。现有数据确实支持在某些情况下使用大麻来控制疼痛,但大麻对癌症相关疼痛的疗效并不明确。基于有限的数据,一些人建议使用大麻替代阿片类药物来治疗癌症相关疼痛。材料/方法 2021 年 1 月 1 日,密歇根放射肿瘤质量联合会(MROQC)针对骨转移患者的调查问卷中增加了有关大麻使用情况的问题。此外,还对疼痛评分、阿片类药物使用情况、社会、人口和疾病特征进行了前瞻性收集。使用逻辑回归建立的多变量模型确定了近期大麻使用与阿片类药物使用之间的关联,并考虑了相关的患者和疾病特征。在 2096 名患者中,共有 1143 人(54.5%)完成了关于近期使用大麻情况的问卷调查;2096 名患者中有 1912 人(91%)完成了关于目前使用阿片类药物情况的问卷调查;2096 名患者中有 1064 人(51%)完成了这两项问卷调查。在同时完成这两项调查的人中,1064 人中有 132 人(12%)报告近期使用过阿片类药物和大麻,1064 人中有 320 人(30%)报告近期使用过阿片类药物但未使用过大麻,1064 人中有 57 人(5%)报告近期未使用过阿片类药物但使用过大麻,1064 人中有 281 人(26%)报告近期未使用过阿片类药物或大麻,其余的人(274/1064 [26%])通过选择 "拒绝回答 "来拒绝回答大麻使用问题。在多变量模型中,使用大麻[OR = 2.11 (95% CI = 1.37, 3.26) P = 0.001]以及疼痛评分[评分 1-3 vs 0, OR = 2.32 (95% CI = 1.36, 3.94); 评分 4-7 vs 0, OR = 6.55 (95% CI = 4.06, 10.6); Score 8-10 vs 0, OR = 11.20 (95% CI = 6.32, 19.8), P < 0.001]、非甾体抗炎药使用[OR = 1.66 (95% CI = 1.17, 2.37) P = 0.005]、既往系统治疗[OR = 0.54 (95% CI = 0.37, 0.78) P = 0.005]、转移病灶数量[3-5 vs 1-2,OR = 1.57 (95% CI = 0.95, 2.26);5-10 vs 1-2,OR = 1.54 (95% CI = 0.91, 2.59);11+ vs 1-2,OR = 3.26 (95% CI = 2.06, 5.15) P < 0.001]可预测阿片类药物的使用,而年龄、性别和种族则无法预测。虽然有人认为大麻的供应可能会减少癌症患者对阿片类药物的使用,但我们发现大麻的使用会预测阿片类药物的使用,这并不支持这一假设。这些数据表明,在这一人群中,大麻使用与阿片类药物使用之间的关系更为复杂。需要进一步研究评估同时使用大麻和阿片类药物的风险,并探讨患者同时使用大麻和阿片类药物的理由。
Relationship between Cannabis Use and Opioid Use in Patients with Cancer Metastatic to Bone in a Large Multicenter Cohort from a State with Legalized Adult Non-Medical Cannabis
Purpose/Objective(s)
Patients with cancer who use cannabis frequently note pain as a reason for their cannabis use. Available data do support cannabis use for management of pain in some settings, though the effectiveness of cannabis for cancer-associated pain is less clear. Based on limited data, some have suggested that cannabis might be used as an alternative to opiates for management of cancer-related pain. We sought to determine the relationship between cannabis use and opioid use in a multicenter cohort of patients undergoing radiotherapy for bone metastases.
Materials/Methods
On January 1, 2021, questions about cannabis use were added to Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium (MROQC) questionnaires for bone metastasis patients. Pain scores, opioid use, social, demographic, and disease characteristics were also prospectively collected. A multivariable model using logistic regression identified associations between recent cannabis use and opioid use, accounting for relevant patient and disease characteristics.
Results
Since questions on cannabis were introduced, 2,096 patients have been enrolled. A total of 1143 of 2096 (54.5%) completed questionnaires about recent cannabis use; 1912 of 2096 (91%) completed questionnaires about current opioid use; and 1064 of 2096 (51%) completed both. Among those who completed both, 132 of 1064 (12%) reported recent opioid and cannabis use, 320 of 1064 (30%) reported recent opioid but not cannabis use, 57 of 1064 (5%) reported no recent opioid but recent cannabis use, 281 of 1064 (26%) reported no recent opioid or cannabis use, and the remaining individuals (274/1064 [26%]) declined to answer cannabis use questions by selecting “decline to answer”. In a multivariable model, cannabis use [OR = 2.11 (95% CI = 1.37, 3.26) P = 0.001], along with pain score [Score 1-3 vs 0, OR = 2.32 (95% CI = 1.36, 3.94); Score 4-7 vs 0, OR = 6.55 (95% CI = 4.06, 10.6); Score 8-10 vs 0, OR = 11.20 (95% CI = 6.32, 19.8), P < 0.001], NSAID use [OR = 1.66 (95% CI = 1.17, 2.37) P = 0.005], prior systemic therapy [OR = 0.54 (95% CI = 0.37, 0.78) P = 0.005], and number of metastatic lesions [3-5 vs 1-2, OR = 1.57 (95% CI = 0.95, 2.26); 5-10 vs 1-2, OR = 1.54 (95% CI = 0.91, 2.59); 11+ vs 1-2, OR = 3.26 (95% CI = 2.06, 5.15) P < 0.001] predicted opiate use while age, gender, and race did not.
Conclusion
Patients with bone metastases frequently use cannabis, opioids, or both. Though it has been suggested that cannabis availability might reduce opioid use among patients with cancer, our finding that cannabis use predicts opioid use does not support this hypothesis. These data suggest a more complex relationship between cannabis use and opioid use in this population. Further study is needed to assess risks of concurrent cannabis and opioid use and to explore patient rationale for concurrent usage.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.