脑转移灶切除术后,切除腔低分次立体定向放疗 (HFSRT) 与全脑放疗 (WBRT) 的神经认知和生活质量对比 - ESTRON 随机 2 期试验的结果

{"title":"脑转移灶切除术后,切除腔低分次立体定向放疗 (HFSRT) 与全脑放疗 (WBRT) 的神经认知和生活质量对比 - ESTRON 随机 2 期试验的结果","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>The ESTRON randomized phase 2 trial compared post-operative hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) of the resection cavity following brain metastases (BM) resection with post-operative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in patients with 1-10 BM. We previously presented local control (LC), intracranial control (IC) and overall survival (OS). Neurocognitive function and quality of life were pre-specified secondary endpoints.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>Neurocognitive testing included the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) total recall (TR) and delayed recall (DR). A drop of ≥ 5 points from baseline in HVLT-R total recall was considered clinically relevant. Health-related Quality of Life (hr-QoL) was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C15 PAL questionnaire and brain module (BN-20). All Assessments were performed at baseline, 6-8 weeks after treatment and three-monthly afterwards for 12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-four patients were randomized; HFSRT <em>n</em> = 27, WBRT <em>n</em> = 27. HFSRT provided 3-year LC of 96% with similar IC and OS between groups, as reported previously. Median baseline HVLT-R score was 24.0 (Q1-Q3 = 18-27) in the HFSRT-group vs. 26.0 (Q1-Q3 = 22-28) in the WBRT-group for TR subscale and 8.0 (Q1-Q3 = 5-10, HFSRT-group) vs. 9.5 (Q1-Q3 = 8-12, WBRT-group) for DR subscale. A drop of ≥ 5 points from baseline occurred in 5 patients (18.5%) in the HFSRT-group vs. 8 patients (29.6%) in the WBRT group (risk difference 0.11, 95% CI = [-0.34 to 0.12], <em>P</em> = 0.34). Maximum change in median HVLT-R TR score was +8.3% (Q1-Q3 = 23-34, HFSRT-group) vs. -11.5% (Q1-Q3 = 18-28, WBRT-group) at 31 weeks from baseline (<em>P</em> = 0.079). At no timepoint did the median HVLT-R TR score decline from baseline in the HFSRT-group. For DR subscale, median change from baseline was +17.6% (Q1-Q3 = 8-12, HFSRT-group) vs. -15.8% (Q1-Q3 = 4-10, WBRT-group) at 31 weeks (<em>P</em> = 0.246). Overall hr-QoL (QLQ-C15 PAL) was similar in both groups. Regarding functional subscales, in the WBRT-group a relevant increase in nausea/vomiting (mean +33.3, standard deviation (SD) = 13.4 points, <em>P</em> = 0.001) and appetite loss (mean +40.3, SD = 32.6 points, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) was observed 7 weeks from baseline with no respective change in the HFSRT-group. The other functional scales of QLQ-C15 PAL and BN-20 were not relevantly different between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While providing excellent local control, HFSRT following BM resection preserves neurocognition more effectively than WBRT, with differences most pronounced at 7 months from baseline. Overall hr-QoL was similar, although WBRT acutely worsened nausea and appetite loss.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurocognition and Quality of Life for Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy (HFSRT) of the Resection Cavity vs. Whole-Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) Following Brain Metastasis Resection – Results of the ESTRON Randomized Phase 2 Trial\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>The ESTRON randomized phase 2 trial compared post-operative hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) of the resection cavity following brain metastases (BM) resection with post-operative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in patients with 1-10 BM. We previously presented local control (LC), intracranial control (IC) and overall survival (OS). Neurocognitive function and quality of life were pre-specified secondary endpoints.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>Neurocognitive testing included the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) total recall (TR) and delayed recall (DR). A drop of ≥ 5 points from baseline in HVLT-R total recall was considered clinically relevant. Health-related Quality of Life (hr-QoL) was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C15 PAL questionnaire and brain module (BN-20). All Assessments were performed at baseline, 6-8 weeks after treatment and three-monthly afterwards for 12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-four patients were randomized; HFSRT <em>n</em> = 27, WBRT <em>n</em> = 27. HFSRT provided 3-year LC of 96% with similar IC and OS between groups, as reported previously. Median baseline HVLT-R score was 24.0 (Q1-Q3 = 18-27) in the HFSRT-group vs. 26.0 (Q1-Q3 = 22-28) in the WBRT-group for TR subscale and 8.0 (Q1-Q3 = 5-10, HFSRT-group) vs. 9.5 (Q1-Q3 = 8-12, WBRT-group) for DR subscale. A drop of ≥ 5 points from baseline occurred in 5 patients (18.5%) in the HFSRT-group vs. 8 patients (29.6%) in the WBRT group (risk difference 0.11, 95% CI = [-0.34 to 0.12], <em>P</em> = 0.34). Maximum change in median HVLT-R TR score was +8.3% (Q1-Q3 = 23-34, HFSRT-group) vs. -11.5% (Q1-Q3 = 18-28, WBRT-group) at 31 weeks from baseline (<em>P</em> = 0.079). At no timepoint did the median HVLT-R TR score decline from baseline in the HFSRT-group. For DR subscale, median change from baseline was +17.6% (Q1-Q3 = 8-12, HFSRT-group) vs. -15.8% (Q1-Q3 = 4-10, WBRT-group) at 31 weeks (<em>P</em> = 0.246). Overall hr-QoL (QLQ-C15 PAL) was similar in both groups. Regarding functional subscales, in the WBRT-group a relevant increase in nausea/vomiting (mean +33.3, standard deviation (SD) = 13.4 points, <em>P</em> = 0.001) and appetite loss (mean +40.3, SD = 32.6 points, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) was observed 7 weeks from baseline with no respective change in the HFSRT-group. The other functional scales of QLQ-C15 PAL and BN-20 were not relevantly different between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While providing excellent local control, HFSRT following BM resection preserves neurocognition more effectively than WBRT, with differences most pronounced at 7 months from baseline. Overall hr-QoL was similar, although WBRT acutely worsened nausea and appetite loss.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624008204\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624008204","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ESTRON随机2期试验比较了脑转移瘤(BM)切除术后切除腔低分次立体定向放疗(HFSRT)与术后全脑放疗(WBRT)对1-10个BM患者的治疗效果。我们之前介绍了局部控制(LC)、颅内控制(IC)和总生存率(OS)。材料/方法神经认知测试包括霍普金斯言语学习测验-修订版(HVLT-R)总回忆(TR)和延迟回忆(DR)。HVLT-R总回忆比基线下降≥5分被认为具有临床相关性。健康相关生活质量(hr-QoL)采用欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织(EORTC)QLQ-C15 PAL问卷和脑模块(BN-20)进行评估。所有评估均在基线、治疗后 6-8 周和治疗后三个月进行,为期 12 个月。根据之前的报告,HFSRT 的 3 年生存率为 96%,各组间的 IC 和 OS 相似。HFSRT组的HVLT-R中位基线分值为24.0(Q1-Q3 = 18-27),WBRT组的TR分值为26.0(Q1-Q3 = 22-28);HFSRT组的DR分值为8.0(Q1-Q3 = 5-10,HFSRT组),WBRT组的DR分值为9.5(Q1-Q3 = 8-12,WBRT组)。HFSRT组有5名患者(18.5%)与WBRT组的8名患者(29.6%)相比,从基线下降了≥5分(风险差异为0.11,95% CI = [-0.34 to 0.12],P = 0.34)。与基线相比,在31周时,HVLT-R TR评分中位数的最大变化为+8.3%(Q1-Q3 = 23-34,HFSRT组)vs -11.5%(Q1-Q3 = 18-28,WBRT组)(P = 0.079)。在任何时间点,HFSRT 组的 HVLT-R TR 评分中位数均未从基线下降。在 DR 子量表方面,31 周时与基线相比,中位变化率为 +17.6%(Q1-Q3 = 8-12,HFSRT 组),而 WBRT 组为 -15.8%(Q1-Q3 = 4-10,WBRT 组)(P = 0.246)。两组的总体 hr-QoL (QLQ-C15 PAL)相似。在功能分量表方面,WBRT 组的恶心/呕吐(平均 +33.3,标准差 (SD) = 13.4 分,P = 0.001)和食欲不振(平均 +40.3,标准差 = 32.6 分,P <0.001)与基线值相比有显著增加,而 HFSRT 组则没有相应变化。结论乳腺肿瘤切除术后的 HFSRT 在提供良好的局部控制的同时,比 WBRT 更有效地保留了神经认知,在基线起 7 个月时差异最为明显。虽然 WBRT 会使恶心和食欲减退的情况急性恶化,但总体的生活质量相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neurocognition and Quality of Life for Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy (HFSRT) of the Resection Cavity vs. Whole-Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) Following Brain Metastasis Resection – Results of the ESTRON Randomized Phase 2 Trial

Purpose/Objective(s)

The ESTRON randomized phase 2 trial compared post-operative hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) of the resection cavity following brain metastases (BM) resection with post-operative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in patients with 1-10 BM. We previously presented local control (LC), intracranial control (IC) and overall survival (OS). Neurocognitive function and quality of life were pre-specified secondary endpoints.

Materials/Methods

Neurocognitive testing included the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) total recall (TR) and delayed recall (DR). A drop of ≥ 5 points from baseline in HVLT-R total recall was considered clinically relevant. Health-related Quality of Life (hr-QoL) was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C15 PAL questionnaire and brain module (BN-20). All Assessments were performed at baseline, 6-8 weeks after treatment and three-monthly afterwards for 12 months.

Results

Fifty-four patients were randomized; HFSRT n = 27, WBRT n = 27. HFSRT provided 3-year LC of 96% with similar IC and OS between groups, as reported previously. Median baseline HVLT-R score was 24.0 (Q1-Q3 = 18-27) in the HFSRT-group vs. 26.0 (Q1-Q3 = 22-28) in the WBRT-group for TR subscale and 8.0 (Q1-Q3 = 5-10, HFSRT-group) vs. 9.5 (Q1-Q3 = 8-12, WBRT-group) for DR subscale. A drop of ≥ 5 points from baseline occurred in 5 patients (18.5%) in the HFSRT-group vs. 8 patients (29.6%) in the WBRT group (risk difference 0.11, 95% CI = [-0.34 to 0.12], P = 0.34). Maximum change in median HVLT-R TR score was +8.3% (Q1-Q3 = 23-34, HFSRT-group) vs. -11.5% (Q1-Q3 = 18-28, WBRT-group) at 31 weeks from baseline (P = 0.079). At no timepoint did the median HVLT-R TR score decline from baseline in the HFSRT-group. For DR subscale, median change from baseline was +17.6% (Q1-Q3 = 8-12, HFSRT-group) vs. -15.8% (Q1-Q3 = 4-10, WBRT-group) at 31 weeks (P = 0.246). Overall hr-QoL (QLQ-C15 PAL) was similar in both groups. Regarding functional subscales, in the WBRT-group a relevant increase in nausea/vomiting (mean +33.3, standard deviation (SD) = 13.4 points, P = 0.001) and appetite loss (mean +40.3, SD = 32.6 points, P < 0.001) was observed 7 weeks from baseline with no respective change in the HFSRT-group. The other functional scales of QLQ-C15 PAL and BN-20 were not relevantly different between groups.

Conclusion

While providing excellent local control, HFSRT following BM resection preserves neurocognition more effectively than WBRT, with differences most pronounced at 7 months from baseline. Overall hr-QoL was similar, although WBRT acutely worsened nausea and appetite loss.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
A Phase I Trial of Image-Guided, Risk-Volume-Adapted Post-Prostatectomy Radiotherapy. ORAI2 is Important for the Development of Early-Stage Post-Irradiation Fibrosis in Salivary Glands. Safety Profile of Durvalumab (D) as Consolidation Treatment (tx) in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer (LS-SCLC) in ADRIATIC: Focus on Pneumonitis and Immune-Mediated Adverse Events (imAEs) Contralateral Neck Recurrence Rates in Head and Neck Carcinomas after Primary Surgery, Bilateral Neck Dissection, a Pathologically Negative Contralateral Neck, and Adjuvant Ipsilateral Neck Radiation Phase II Trial of Proton Re-Irradiation+/-Chemotherapy in Previously Irradiated Recurrent Head/Neck Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1