乳腺癌女性患者接受低分流结节区域放疗后的长期淋巴水肿率:2期临床试验--"HeNRIetta"

{"title":"乳腺癌女性患者接受低分流结节区域放疗后的长期淋巴水肿率:2期临床试验--\"HeNRIetta\"","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>Moderate hypofractionation in the management of localized breast cancer is considered standard of care. Data suggests its use in the setting of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) yields equivalent oncologic and cosmetic outcomes but has not yet achieved universal acceptance into practice. The risk of lymphedema (LA) has not been the focus of study in this setting and therefore, we sought to evaluate the risk and establish the rate of moderate or marked LA for patients treated with hypofractionated RNI utilizing an established and commonly used hypofractionation treatment scheme with standardized treatment volumes for patients with node-positive breast cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>Women with node positive breast cancer who underwent definitive surgical resection were eligible for enrollment. Breast surgery may have been lumpectomy (Lp), mastectomy without reconstruction (M-R), or mastectomy with reconstruction (M+R). Nodal staging by sentinel lymph node (SLN) or by axillary lymph node (ALN) dissection were included. Patients could undergo neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy at the discretion of the treating medical oncologist. Breast and RNI was administered to 42.56 Gy in 16 daily fractions. The dissected axilla was excluded as a target volume in patients who underwent ALN dissection. Primary endpoint was rate of LA at 3 years following RNI for two cohorts, SLN (cohort A) and ALN (cohort B). Lymphedema was defined as ≥ 10% increase in arm circumference over baseline circumference as compared to the contralateral arm measured every 6 months for the first 3 years. Per protocol-defined to declare moderate hypofractionation non-inferior to recent historical controls cohorts A and B rate of lymphedema were estimated to be 6% and 10% respectively, a non-inferiority margin of +/- 7% was used. Secondary objectives included 5-year oncologic outcomes, grade 3 or higher toxicities, cosmesis and patient reported outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between September 2015 and July 2021, a total of 134 women were enrolled, 84 underwent SLN only and 50 completed ALN dissection. Mean age was 58.1 years for cohort A and 62.5 years for cohort B. Lp, M+R, and M-R was performed in 58.2%, 19.4, and 30% respectively. LA was observed in 11 patients (13.1%) with SLN only (<em>P</em> = 0.5897) and 9 patients (18%) who underwent ALN dissection (<em>P</em> = 0.65971). Only 2 patients developed grade 2 LA (limiting instrumental activities of daily living) and no grade 3 (limiting self-care activities of daily living) was observed. At 36 month follow up 85.5% in the lumpectomy group and 75.9% in the mastectomy with reconstruction group had excellent or good cosmesis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Moderate hypofractionation did not meet the criteria defined by the protocol for non-inferiority. However, the absolute rates of LA remain low and predominantly grade 1. Cosmetic outcomes in this advanced disease group of patients are favorable. This data does not appear to support the argument that the risk of LA is a reason to avoid moderate hypofractionated regional nodal irradiation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long Term Rates of Lymphedema in Hypofractionated Nodal Regional Irradiation for Women with Breast Cancer: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial – “HeNRIetta”\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>Moderate hypofractionation in the management of localized breast cancer is considered standard of care. Data suggests its use in the setting of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) yields equivalent oncologic and cosmetic outcomes but has not yet achieved universal acceptance into practice. The risk of lymphedema (LA) has not been the focus of study in this setting and therefore, we sought to evaluate the risk and establish the rate of moderate or marked LA for patients treated with hypofractionated RNI utilizing an established and commonly used hypofractionation treatment scheme with standardized treatment volumes for patients with node-positive breast cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>Women with node positive breast cancer who underwent definitive surgical resection were eligible for enrollment. Breast surgery may have been lumpectomy (Lp), mastectomy without reconstruction (M-R), or mastectomy with reconstruction (M+R). Nodal staging by sentinel lymph node (SLN) or by axillary lymph node (ALN) dissection were included. Patients could undergo neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy at the discretion of the treating medical oncologist. Breast and RNI was administered to 42.56 Gy in 16 daily fractions. The dissected axilla was excluded as a target volume in patients who underwent ALN dissection. Primary endpoint was rate of LA at 3 years following RNI for two cohorts, SLN (cohort A) and ALN (cohort B). Lymphedema was defined as ≥ 10% increase in arm circumference over baseline circumference as compared to the contralateral arm measured every 6 months for the first 3 years. Per protocol-defined to declare moderate hypofractionation non-inferior to recent historical controls cohorts A and B rate of lymphedema were estimated to be 6% and 10% respectively, a non-inferiority margin of +/- 7% was used. Secondary objectives included 5-year oncologic outcomes, grade 3 or higher toxicities, cosmesis and patient reported outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between September 2015 and July 2021, a total of 134 women were enrolled, 84 underwent SLN only and 50 completed ALN dissection. Mean age was 58.1 years for cohort A and 62.5 years for cohort B. Lp, M+R, and M-R was performed in 58.2%, 19.4, and 30% respectively. LA was observed in 11 patients (13.1%) with SLN only (<em>P</em> = 0.5897) and 9 patients (18%) who underwent ALN dissection (<em>P</em> = 0.65971). Only 2 patients developed grade 2 LA (limiting instrumental activities of daily living) and no grade 3 (limiting self-care activities of daily living) was observed. At 36 month follow up 85.5% in the lumpectomy group and 75.9% in the mastectomy with reconstruction group had excellent or good cosmesis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Moderate hypofractionation did not meet the criteria defined by the protocol for non-inferiority. However, the absolute rates of LA remain low and predominantly grade 1. Cosmetic outcomes in this advanced disease group of patients are favorable. This data does not appear to support the argument that the risk of LA is a reason to avoid moderate hypofractionated regional nodal irradiation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624007703\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624007703","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/目标在治疗局部乳腺癌时,适度低分次照射被认为是标准的治疗方法。有数据表明,在区域结节照射(RNI)的情况下使用该方法可获得同等的肿瘤和美容效果,但尚未被普遍接受。在这种情况下,淋巴水肿(LA)的风险并不是研究的重点,因此,我们试图评估淋巴水肿(LA)的风险,并确定结节阳性乳腺癌患者接受低分次 RNI 治疗的中度或明显 LA 的发生率。乳房手术可能是肿块切除术(Lp)、无重建乳房的乳房切除术(M-R)或重建乳房的乳房切除术(M+R)。包括通过前哨淋巴结(SLN)或腋窝淋巴结(ALN)清扫进行结节分期。患者可以接受新辅助化疗或辅助化疗,由肿瘤内科医生决定。乳腺和RNI的剂量为42.56 Gy,每天16次。接受ALN切除术的患者,切除的腋窝不作为靶区。主要终点是SLN(A组)和ALN(B组)两组患者RNI术后3年的LA发生率。淋巴水肿的定义是:在最初 3 年中,每 6 个月测量一次手臂周长,与基线周长相比,手臂周长比对侧手臂周长增加≥10%。根据方案定义,中度低分切法的淋巴水肿率估计分别为6%和10%,因此采用+/- 7%的非劣效边际,宣布中度低分切法不劣于最近的历史对照组A和B。次要目标包括5年肿瘤学结果、3级或更高毒性、外观和患者报告结果。结果2015年9月至2021年7月期间,共有134名妇女入组,其中84人仅接受了SLN,50人完成了ALN解剖。58.2%、19.4%和30%的患者接受了Lp、M+R和M-R手术。11名仅接受SLN治疗的患者(13.1%)观察到LA(P=0.5897),9名接受ALN切除术的患者(18%)观察到LA(P=0.65971)。只有 2 名患者出现 2 级 LA(日常生活工具活动受限),没有发现 3 级 LA(日常生活自理活动受限)。在36个月的随访中,肿块切除术组85.5%的患者和乳房切除与重建术组75.9%的患者的外观极佳或良好。然而,LA的绝对比率仍然很低,而且主要是1级。这一晚期患者群体的美容效果良好。这些数据似乎并不支持这样的观点,即LA的风险是避免进行中度低分次区域结节照射的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long Term Rates of Lymphedema in Hypofractionated Nodal Regional Irradiation for Women with Breast Cancer: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial – “HeNRIetta”

Purpose/Objective(s)

Moderate hypofractionation in the management of localized breast cancer is considered standard of care. Data suggests its use in the setting of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) yields equivalent oncologic and cosmetic outcomes but has not yet achieved universal acceptance into practice. The risk of lymphedema (LA) has not been the focus of study in this setting and therefore, we sought to evaluate the risk and establish the rate of moderate or marked LA for patients treated with hypofractionated RNI utilizing an established and commonly used hypofractionation treatment scheme with standardized treatment volumes for patients with node-positive breast cancer.

Materials/Methods

Women with node positive breast cancer who underwent definitive surgical resection were eligible for enrollment. Breast surgery may have been lumpectomy (Lp), mastectomy without reconstruction (M-R), or mastectomy with reconstruction (M+R). Nodal staging by sentinel lymph node (SLN) or by axillary lymph node (ALN) dissection were included. Patients could undergo neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy at the discretion of the treating medical oncologist. Breast and RNI was administered to 42.56 Gy in 16 daily fractions. The dissected axilla was excluded as a target volume in patients who underwent ALN dissection. Primary endpoint was rate of LA at 3 years following RNI for two cohorts, SLN (cohort A) and ALN (cohort B). Lymphedema was defined as ≥ 10% increase in arm circumference over baseline circumference as compared to the contralateral arm measured every 6 months for the first 3 years. Per protocol-defined to declare moderate hypofractionation non-inferior to recent historical controls cohorts A and B rate of lymphedema were estimated to be 6% and 10% respectively, a non-inferiority margin of +/- 7% was used. Secondary objectives included 5-year oncologic outcomes, grade 3 or higher toxicities, cosmesis and patient reported outcomes.

Results

Between September 2015 and July 2021, a total of 134 women were enrolled, 84 underwent SLN only and 50 completed ALN dissection. Mean age was 58.1 years for cohort A and 62.5 years for cohort B. Lp, M+R, and M-R was performed in 58.2%, 19.4, and 30% respectively. LA was observed in 11 patients (13.1%) with SLN only (P = 0.5897) and 9 patients (18%) who underwent ALN dissection (P = 0.65971). Only 2 patients developed grade 2 LA (limiting instrumental activities of daily living) and no grade 3 (limiting self-care activities of daily living) was observed. At 36 month follow up 85.5% in the lumpectomy group and 75.9% in the mastectomy with reconstruction group had excellent or good cosmesis.

Conclusion

Moderate hypofractionation did not meet the criteria defined by the protocol for non-inferiority. However, the absolute rates of LA remain low and predominantly grade 1. Cosmetic outcomes in this advanced disease group of patients are favorable. This data does not appear to support the argument that the risk of LA is a reason to avoid moderate hypofractionated regional nodal irradiation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
A Phase I Trial of Image-Guided, Risk-Volume-Adapted Post-Prostatectomy Radiotherapy. ORAI2 is Important for the Development of Early-Stage Post-Irradiation Fibrosis in Salivary Glands. Safety Profile of Durvalumab (D) as Consolidation Treatment (tx) in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer (LS-SCLC) in ADRIATIC: Focus on Pneumonitis and Immune-Mediated Adverse Events (imAEs) Contralateral Neck Recurrence Rates in Head and Neck Carcinomas after Primary Surgery, Bilateral Neck Dissection, a Pathologically Negative Contralateral Neck, and Adjuvant Ipsilateral Neck Radiation Phase II Trial of Proton Re-Irradiation+/-Chemotherapy in Previously Irradiated Recurrent Head/Neck Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1