全球数据治理正处于转折点?反思中美跨境数据流监管模式

IF 3.3 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Computer Law & Security Review Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106061
{"title":"全球数据治理正处于转折点?反思中美跨境数据流监管模式","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China and the United States have traditionally represented the ‘security paradigm’ and ‘freedom paradigm’ in their regulatory approaches to cross-border data flow. However, with the introduction of new rules governing these flows in both countries, this article challenges that perspective and explores the potential implications of this shift for global data governance. Specifically, it analyzes how the recent regulations in China and the United States serve as critical turning points affecting the transition between these paradigms, focusing on the overall regulatory frameworks and institutional developments in both nations. The article provides legal, institutional, and case-based examples to illustrate these changes. Furthermore, it offers a comparative analysis of the existing models for cross-border data flow regulation between China and the United States. Targeted compliance advice is provided for multinational corporations and other businesses frequently engaging in international operations that may be impacted by these regulatory changes. This research aims to deliver comprehensive insights into the latest regulatory developments in both countries and their existing models for cross-border data governance, thereby assisting enterprises in developing effective compliance strategies in practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51516,"journal":{"name":"Computer Law & Security Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global data governance at a turning point? Rethinking China-U.S. cross-border data flow regulatory models\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>China and the United States have traditionally represented the ‘security paradigm’ and ‘freedom paradigm’ in their regulatory approaches to cross-border data flow. However, with the introduction of new rules governing these flows in both countries, this article challenges that perspective and explores the potential implications of this shift for global data governance. Specifically, it analyzes how the recent regulations in China and the United States serve as critical turning points affecting the transition between these paradigms, focusing on the overall regulatory frameworks and institutional developments in both nations. The article provides legal, institutional, and case-based examples to illustrate these changes. Furthermore, it offers a comparative analysis of the existing models for cross-border data flow regulation between China and the United States. Targeted compliance advice is provided for multinational corporations and other businesses frequently engaging in international operations that may be impacted by these regulatory changes. This research aims to deliver comprehensive insights into the latest regulatory developments in both countries and their existing models for cross-border data governance, thereby assisting enterprises in developing effective compliance strategies in practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924001274\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Law & Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924001274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国和美国对跨境数据流的监管方式历来代表着 "安全范式 "和 "自由范式"。然而,随着中美两国出台新的数据流监管规则,本文对这一观点提出了挑战,并探讨了这一转变对全球数据治理的潜在影响。具体来说,文章分析了中国和美国最近的法规如何成为影响这些模式之间过渡的关键转折点,重点关注两国的整体监管框架和制度发展。文章提供了法律、制度和案例来说明这些变化。此外,文章还对中美跨境数据流监管的现有模式进行了比较分析。文章为可能受到这些监管变化影响的跨国公司和其他经常从事国际业务的企业提供了有针对性的合规建议。本研究旨在全面解读中美两国最新的监管动态及其现有的跨境数据治理模式,从而帮助企业在实践中制定有效的合规策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global data governance at a turning point? Rethinking China-U.S. cross-border data flow regulatory models
China and the United States have traditionally represented the ‘security paradigm’ and ‘freedom paradigm’ in their regulatory approaches to cross-border data flow. However, with the introduction of new rules governing these flows in both countries, this article challenges that perspective and explores the potential implications of this shift for global data governance. Specifically, it analyzes how the recent regulations in China and the United States serve as critical turning points affecting the transition between these paradigms, focusing on the overall regulatory frameworks and institutional developments in both nations. The article provides legal, institutional, and case-based examples to illustrate these changes. Furthermore, it offers a comparative analysis of the existing models for cross-border data flow regulation between China and the United States. Targeted compliance advice is provided for multinational corporations and other businesses frequently engaging in international operations that may be impacted by these regulatory changes. This research aims to deliver comprehensive insights into the latest regulatory developments in both countries and their existing models for cross-border data governance, thereby assisting enterprises in developing effective compliance strategies in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: CLSR publishes refereed academic and practitioner papers on topics such as Web 2.0, IT security, Identity management, ID cards, RFID, interference with privacy, Internet law, telecoms regulation, online broadcasting, intellectual property, software law, e-commerce, outsourcing, data protection, EU policy, freedom of information, computer security and many other topics. In addition it provides a regular update on European Union developments, national news from more than 20 jurisdictions in both Europe and the Pacific Rim. It is looking for papers within the subject area that display good quality legal analysis and new lines of legal thought or policy development that go beyond mere description of the subject area, however accurate that may be.
期刊最新文献
Procedural fairness in automated asylum procedures: Fundamental rights for fundamental challenges Asia-Pacific developments An Infrastructural Brussels Effect: The translation of EU Law into the UK's digital borders Mapping interpretations of the law in online content moderation in Germany A European right to end-to-end encryption?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1