老年癫痫患者初始抗癫痫药物治疗的趋势、处方模式和决定因素。

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International Journal of Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1093/ijpp/riae055
Noppaket Singkham, Pitsamai Saiwijit, Papavee Sangliamthong, Tawanrat Panthong, Hataikan Wiangkham
{"title":"老年癫痫患者初始抗癫痫药物治疗的趋势、处方模式和决定因素。","authors":"Noppaket Singkham, Pitsamai Saiwijit, Papavee Sangliamthong, Tawanrat Panthong, Hataikan Wiangkham","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riae055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is no report on the initial antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment of older Thai epileptic patients. This study aimed to determine the trends, prescribing patterns, and determinants of initial AED treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used data on older (≥60 years) epileptic patients gathered from one tertiary-care hospital's database from 2012 to 2022. We evaluated the trends and prescribing patterns for starting AED treatment. We used logistic regression to identify the determinants of the initial treatment with new-generation AEDs.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>This study comprised 919 participants (59.19% men, 70.99 ± 8.00 years old). Between 2012 and 2022, we observed a decreasing trend in starting therapy with old-generation AEDs, from 89.16% to 64.58%. In contrast, there was an increasing trend in initiating treatment with new-generation AEDs, from 10.84% to 35.72% (P for trend <0.001 for both). Each assessment year, the most prescribed treatment pattern was monotherapy. The determinants of initial therapy with new-generation AEDs included the year treatment began (adjusted odds ratios [AOR] = 1.0006; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.0003-1.0008), non-Universal Coverage Scheme (AOR = 1.94; 95% CI 1.26-3.00), liver disease (AOR = 6.44; 95% CI 2.30-18.08), opioid use (AOR = 2.79; 95% CI 1.28-6.09), and statin use (AOR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.36-0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a growing trend of initiating treatment with new-generation AEDs in older Thai patients with epilepsy. Factors positively associated with starting new-generation AEDs include the year treatment began, non-Universal Coverage Scheme, liver disease, and opioid use, while statin use is a negatively associated factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"498-506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends, prescribing patterns, and determinants of initial antiepileptic drug treatment in older epileptic patients.\",\"authors\":\"Noppaket Singkham, Pitsamai Saiwijit, Papavee Sangliamthong, Tawanrat Panthong, Hataikan Wiangkham\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ijpp/riae055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is no report on the initial antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment of older Thai epileptic patients. This study aimed to determine the trends, prescribing patterns, and determinants of initial AED treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used data on older (≥60 years) epileptic patients gathered from one tertiary-care hospital's database from 2012 to 2022. We evaluated the trends and prescribing patterns for starting AED treatment. We used logistic regression to identify the determinants of the initial treatment with new-generation AEDs.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>This study comprised 919 participants (59.19% men, 70.99 ± 8.00 years old). Between 2012 and 2022, we observed a decreasing trend in starting therapy with old-generation AEDs, from 89.16% to 64.58%. In contrast, there was an increasing trend in initiating treatment with new-generation AEDs, from 10.84% to 35.72% (P for trend <0.001 for both). Each assessment year, the most prescribed treatment pattern was monotherapy. The determinants of initial therapy with new-generation AEDs included the year treatment began (adjusted odds ratios [AOR] = 1.0006; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.0003-1.0008), non-Universal Coverage Scheme (AOR = 1.94; 95% CI 1.26-3.00), liver disease (AOR = 6.44; 95% CI 2.30-18.08), opioid use (AOR = 2.79; 95% CI 1.28-6.09), and statin use (AOR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.36-0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a growing trend of initiating treatment with new-generation AEDs in older Thai patients with epilepsy. Factors positively associated with starting new-generation AEDs include the year treatment began, non-Universal Coverage Scheme, liver disease, and opioid use, while statin use is a negatively associated factor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"498-506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riae055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riae055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前还没有关于泰国老年癫痫患者初始抗癫痫药物(AED)治疗的报告。本研究旨在确定初始 AED 治疗的趋势、处方模式和决定因素:这项横断面研究使用了一家三级甲等医院数据库中 2012 年至 2022 年老年(≥60 岁)癫痫患者的数据。我们评估了开始 AED 治疗的趋势和处方模式。我们使用逻辑回归来确定新一代 AEDs 初始治疗的决定因素:这项研究包括 919 名参与者(59.19% 为男性,70.99 ± 8.00 岁)。2012年至2022年期间,我们观察到使用老一代AEDs开始治疗的比例呈下降趋势,从89.16%降至64.58%。相比之下,开始使用新一代 AEDs 治疗的比例呈上升趋势,从 10.84% 上升至 35.72%(P 为趋势结论):泰国老年癫痫患者开始使用新一代 AEDs 治疗的比例呈上升趋势。与开始新一代 AEDs 治疗呈正相关的因素包括开始治疗的年份、非全民医保计划、肝病和阿片类药物的使用,而他汀类药物的使用则是一个负相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trends, prescribing patterns, and determinants of initial antiepileptic drug treatment in older epileptic patients.

Objectives: There is no report on the initial antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment of older Thai epileptic patients. This study aimed to determine the trends, prescribing patterns, and determinants of initial AED treatment.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used data on older (≥60 years) epileptic patients gathered from one tertiary-care hospital's database from 2012 to 2022. We evaluated the trends and prescribing patterns for starting AED treatment. We used logistic regression to identify the determinants of the initial treatment with new-generation AEDs.

Key findings: This study comprised 919 participants (59.19% men, 70.99 ± 8.00 years old). Between 2012 and 2022, we observed a decreasing trend in starting therapy with old-generation AEDs, from 89.16% to 64.58%. In contrast, there was an increasing trend in initiating treatment with new-generation AEDs, from 10.84% to 35.72% (P for trend <0.001 for both). Each assessment year, the most prescribed treatment pattern was monotherapy. The determinants of initial therapy with new-generation AEDs included the year treatment began (adjusted odds ratios [AOR] = 1.0006; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.0003-1.0008), non-Universal Coverage Scheme (AOR = 1.94; 95% CI 1.26-3.00), liver disease (AOR = 6.44; 95% CI 2.30-18.08), opioid use (AOR = 2.79; 95% CI 1.28-6.09), and statin use (AOR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.36-0.95).

Conclusions: There is a growing trend of initiating treatment with new-generation AEDs in older Thai patients with epilepsy. Factors positively associated with starting new-generation AEDs include the year treatment began, non-Universal Coverage Scheme, liver disease, and opioid use, while statin use is a negatively associated factor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Perspectives of Malaysian community pharmacists on challenges and barriers to smoking cessation programme: a qualitative study. Relevance of therapeutic prescription modifications in Dutch community pharmacies. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of community pharmacists providing over-the-counter emergency hormonal contraception: a scoping review. Prescription and nonprescription drug misuse and abuse in community pharmacies in Iraq: a cross-sectional survey. Antibiotic prescribing for acute uncomplicated cystitis among community pharmacists in Thailand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1