2022 年新南威尔士州五个高危城镇的日本脑炎病毒抗体血清流行率。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical Journal of Australia Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.5694/mja2.52453
Md Saiful Islam, Holly Seale
{"title":"2022 年新南威尔士州五个高危城镇的日本脑炎病毒抗体血清流行率。","authors":"Md Saiful Islam,&nbsp;Holly Seale","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><span>To the Editor:</span> The findings from Baldwin and colleagues,<span><sup>1</sup></span> regarding the seroprevalence of Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV)-specific antibodies in community members (in settings not traditionally considered as risky), underscore the critical need to characterise transmission pathways and identify probable hosts of infection within New South Wales.</p><p>While critical to understand the scope of infection, what we are currently missing is a deep dive into the factors contributing to the risk of JEV. This is not a criticism of their work but rather a call to action as traditional epidemiological studies do not necessarily capture these points (due to the approaches taken) and there is a need to build stronger partnerships within One Health to ensure that the broader social–ecological risk factors at the individual, family, community, and national levels are captured.<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>Given the increasing cases of arboviruses and the shift in epidemiology, it is critical that we start ensuring our epidemiology studies are coupled with opportunities to capture data on exposure history, behaviour and practices that facilitate prevention or transmission. To support public health measures, it is also critical to understand the risk perceptions of community members, what protective measures they are using to avoid mosquito bites and if they are willing to receive vaccines against JEV.</p><p>Regarding risk history, we do not have a good sense of how much time the infected individuals spent outside the home, what kinds of activities they did, and where. Vaccination is the best method to prevent JEV, but did we prepare this community for JEV vaccines? Lessons learnt during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic showed that the likelihood of getting the disease and risk perceptions towards the vaccine affected vaccine acceptance.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>Social science intelligence that uses open-ended unstructured interviews, participant observation and group discussion is in the best position to answer these questions.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Outbreaks of JEV have been reported in Australia since 1995;<span><sup>5</sup></span> however, it is likely that we will see increased JEV incidence. Now is the time to break down siloes and ensure that we are producing outbreak investigations and epidemiological studies that capture these critical social and behavioural factors to inform future approaches.</p><p>No relevant disclosures.</p>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"221 8","pages":"447-448"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52453","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The seroprevalence of antibodies to Japanese encephalitis virus in five New South Wales towns at high risk of infection, 2022\",\"authors\":\"Md Saiful Islam,&nbsp;Holly Seale\",\"doi\":\"10.5694/mja2.52453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><span>To the Editor:</span> The findings from Baldwin and colleagues,<span><sup>1</sup></span> regarding the seroprevalence of Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV)-specific antibodies in community members (in settings not traditionally considered as risky), underscore the critical need to characterise transmission pathways and identify probable hosts of infection within New South Wales.</p><p>While critical to understand the scope of infection, what we are currently missing is a deep dive into the factors contributing to the risk of JEV. This is not a criticism of their work but rather a call to action as traditional epidemiological studies do not necessarily capture these points (due to the approaches taken) and there is a need to build stronger partnerships within One Health to ensure that the broader social–ecological risk factors at the individual, family, community, and national levels are captured.<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>Given the increasing cases of arboviruses and the shift in epidemiology, it is critical that we start ensuring our epidemiology studies are coupled with opportunities to capture data on exposure history, behaviour and practices that facilitate prevention or transmission. To support public health measures, it is also critical to understand the risk perceptions of community members, what protective measures they are using to avoid mosquito bites and if they are willing to receive vaccines against JEV.</p><p>Regarding risk history, we do not have a good sense of how much time the infected individuals spent outside the home, what kinds of activities they did, and where. Vaccination is the best method to prevent JEV, but did we prepare this community for JEV vaccines? Lessons learnt during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic showed that the likelihood of getting the disease and risk perceptions towards the vaccine affected vaccine acceptance.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>Social science intelligence that uses open-ended unstructured interviews, participant observation and group discussion is in the best position to answer these questions.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Outbreaks of JEV have been reported in Australia since 1995;<span><sup>5</sup></span> however, it is likely that we will see increased JEV incidence. Now is the time to break down siloes and ensure that we are producing outbreak investigations and epidemiological studies that capture these critical social and behavioural factors to inform future approaches.</p><p>No relevant disclosures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\"221 8\",\"pages\":\"447-448\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52453\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52453\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52453","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

致编辑Baldwin 及其同事1 关于日本脑炎病毒(JEV)特异性抗体在社区成员(在传统上不被认为有风险的环境中)中的血清流行率的研究结果,强调了描述传播途径和确定新南威尔士州内可能的感染宿主的迫切需要。这并不是对他们工作的批评,而是呼吁采取行动,因为传统的流行病学研究并不一定能捕捉到这些要点(由于所采用的方法),因此有必要在 "一体健康"(One Health)内部建立更强大的合作伙伴关系,以确保捕捉到个人、家庭、社区和国家层面上更广泛的社会生态风险因素。2 鉴于虫媒病毒病例的增加和流行病学的转变,我们必须开始确保我们的流行病学研究与捕捉有关接触史、行为和有利于预防或传播的做法的数据相结合。为了支持公共卫生措施,了解社区成员的风险意识、他们为避免蚊虫叮咬而采取的保护措施以及他们是否愿意接种预防 JEV 的疫苗也至关重要。接种疫苗是预防 JEV 的最佳方法,但我们是否为该社区接种 JEV 疫苗做好了准备?2019 年冠状病毒疾病大流行期间吸取的经验教训表明,感染疾病的可能性和对疫苗的风险认知会影响疫苗的接受度。3 社会科学情报采用开放式非结构化访谈、参与观察和小组讨论的方式,是回答这些问题的最佳方法。现在是打破各自为政的局面,确保我们开展的疫情调查和流行病学研究能够捕捉到这些关键的社会和行为因素,为未来的方法提供依据的时候了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The seroprevalence of antibodies to Japanese encephalitis virus in five New South Wales towns at high risk of infection, 2022

To the Editor: The findings from Baldwin and colleagues,1 regarding the seroprevalence of Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV)-specific antibodies in community members (in settings not traditionally considered as risky), underscore the critical need to characterise transmission pathways and identify probable hosts of infection within New South Wales.

While critical to understand the scope of infection, what we are currently missing is a deep dive into the factors contributing to the risk of JEV. This is not a criticism of their work but rather a call to action as traditional epidemiological studies do not necessarily capture these points (due to the approaches taken) and there is a need to build stronger partnerships within One Health to ensure that the broader social–ecological risk factors at the individual, family, community, and national levels are captured.2

Given the increasing cases of arboviruses and the shift in epidemiology, it is critical that we start ensuring our epidemiology studies are coupled with opportunities to capture data on exposure history, behaviour and practices that facilitate prevention or transmission. To support public health measures, it is also critical to understand the risk perceptions of community members, what protective measures they are using to avoid mosquito bites and if they are willing to receive vaccines against JEV.

Regarding risk history, we do not have a good sense of how much time the infected individuals spent outside the home, what kinds of activities they did, and where. Vaccination is the best method to prevent JEV, but did we prepare this community for JEV vaccines? Lessons learnt during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic showed that the likelihood of getting the disease and risk perceptions towards the vaccine affected vaccine acceptance.3

Social science intelligence that uses open-ended unstructured interviews, participant observation and group discussion is in the best position to answer these questions.4 Outbreaks of JEV have been reported in Australia since 1995;5 however, it is likely that we will see increased JEV incidence. Now is the time to break down siloes and ensure that we are producing outbreak investigations and epidemiological studies that capture these critical social and behavioural factors to inform future approaches.

No relevant disclosures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
期刊最新文献
Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae causing emphysematous pyelonephritis: a life-threatening pathogen within Australian communities. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae causing emphysematous pyelonephritis: a life-threatening pathogen within Australian communities. Setting the standard: no LGBTI+ health equity without data equity. Scabies: a clinical update. The Future Healthy Countdown 2030 consensus statement: core policy actions and measures to achieve improvements in the health and wellbeing of children, young people and future generations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1