常规第三孕期超声波检查和儿童神经发育结果:实用分组随机对照试验的后续研究。

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1080/02646838.2024.2409145
Jens Henrichs, Marielle van Roekel, Anke B Witteveen, Michael Veder, Yoni Feenstra, Arie Franx, Marlou L A de Kroon, Anneloes van Baar, Corine J Verhoeven, Ank de Jonge
{"title":"常规第三孕期超声波检查和儿童神经发育结果:实用分组随机对照试验的后续研究。","authors":"Jens Henrichs, Marielle van Roekel, Anke B Witteveen, Michael Veder, Yoni Feenstra, Arie Franx, Marlou L A de Kroon, Anneloes van Baar, Corine J Verhoeven, Ank de Jonge","doi":"10.1080/02646838.2024.2409145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/background: </strong>Routine third-trimester ultrasonography is increasingly conducted to screen for foetal growth restriction (FGR) and reduce adverse perinatal and child neurodevelopmental outcomes using timely obstetric management. While it did not reduce adverse perinatal outcomes in previous trials, evidence regarding its association with child neurodevelopmental outcome is absent. We examined whether routine third-trimester ultrasonography is positively associated with child developmental and behavioural/emotional outcomes compared to usual care.</p><p><strong>Design/methods: </strong>Dutch mothers with a low-risk pregnancy participating in a subsample (<i>n</i> = 1070) of a nationwide cluster-randomised trial reported infant (age 6 months) and toddler (age 28 months) developmental milestones (Ages and Stages Questionnaire) and toddlers' internalising and externalising problems (Child Behavior Checklist). Usual care (<i>n</i> = 380) comprised selective ultrasonography. The intervention strategy (<i>n</i> = 690) included two routine third-trimester ultrasounds next to usual care. Both strategies applied the same interdisciplinary protocol for FGR detection and management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adjusted linear mixed-level regressions revealed that routine third-trimester ultrasonography was positively but modestly related to z-standardised infant developmental milestones at 6-month follow-up, B = 0.20, 95%CI [0.07; 0.32], <i>p</i> = 0.003, compared to usual care. At 28-month follow-up, these strategies did not differ in child developmental outcome and internalising and externalising problems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routine third-trimester ultrasonography was positively but modestly associated with infant development. In toddlerhood, routine ultrasonography was not related to child developmental and behavioural/emotional outcomes. Overall, these findings do not support the implementation of routine third-trimester ultrasonography for low-risk pregnant women for reasons concerning children's early neurodevelopmental outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Routine third-trimester ultrasonography and child neurodevelopmental outcomes: a follow-up of a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jens Henrichs, Marielle van Roekel, Anke B Witteveen, Michael Veder, Yoni Feenstra, Arie Franx, Marlou L A de Kroon, Anneloes van Baar, Corine J Verhoeven, Ank de Jonge\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02646838.2024.2409145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims/background: </strong>Routine third-trimester ultrasonography is increasingly conducted to screen for foetal growth restriction (FGR) and reduce adverse perinatal and child neurodevelopmental outcomes using timely obstetric management. While it did not reduce adverse perinatal outcomes in previous trials, evidence regarding its association with child neurodevelopmental outcome is absent. We examined whether routine third-trimester ultrasonography is positively associated with child developmental and behavioural/emotional outcomes compared to usual care.</p><p><strong>Design/methods: </strong>Dutch mothers with a low-risk pregnancy participating in a subsample (<i>n</i> = 1070) of a nationwide cluster-randomised trial reported infant (age 6 months) and toddler (age 28 months) developmental milestones (Ages and Stages Questionnaire) and toddlers' internalising and externalising problems (Child Behavior Checklist). Usual care (<i>n</i> = 380) comprised selective ultrasonography. The intervention strategy (<i>n</i> = 690) included two routine third-trimester ultrasounds next to usual care. Both strategies applied the same interdisciplinary protocol for FGR detection and management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adjusted linear mixed-level regressions revealed that routine third-trimester ultrasonography was positively but modestly related to z-standardised infant developmental milestones at 6-month follow-up, B = 0.20, 95%CI [0.07; 0.32], <i>p</i> = 0.003, compared to usual care. At 28-month follow-up, these strategies did not differ in child developmental outcome and internalising and externalising problems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routine third-trimester ultrasonography was positively but modestly associated with infant development. In toddlerhood, routine ultrasonography was not related to child developmental and behavioural/emotional outcomes. Overall, these findings do not support the implementation of routine third-trimester ultrasonography for low-risk pregnant women for reasons concerning children's early neurodevelopmental outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2024.2409145\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2024.2409145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/背景:常规第三孕期超声检查越来越多地用于筛查胎儿生长受限(FGR),并通过及时的产科管理减少围产期和儿童神经发育的不良后果。虽然在以往的试验中,超声检查并未减少围产期不良结局,但却缺乏有关超声检查与儿童神经发育结局相关性的证据。我们研究了与常规护理相比,常规第三孕期超声波检查是否与儿童发育和行为/情感结局呈正相关:荷兰低风险妊娠母亲参与了一项全国性群组随机试验的子样本(n = 1070),并报告了婴儿(6 个月大)和幼儿(28 个月大)的发育里程碑(年龄与阶段问卷)以及幼儿的内化和外化问题(儿童行为检查表)。常规护理(n = 380)包括选择性超声波检查。干预策略(n = 690)除了常规护理外,还包括两次第三胎常规超声波检查。两种策略均采用相同的跨学科方案进行FGR检测和管理:调整后的线性混合水平回归显示,与常规护理相比,常规第三孕期超声波检查与6个月随访时婴儿发育里程碑的z标准化呈正相关,但关系不大,B=0.20,95%CI [0.07; 0.32],P=0.003。在28个月的随访中,这些策略在儿童发育结果、内化和外化问题方面没有差异:结论:常规第三孕期超声波检查与婴儿发育呈正相关,但关系不大。在幼儿期,常规超声波检查与儿童发育和行为/情绪结果无关。总体而言,这些研究结果并不支持出于对儿童早期神经发育结果的考虑,对低风险孕妇实施常规第三孕期超声波检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Routine third-trimester ultrasonography and child neurodevelopmental outcomes: a follow-up of a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Aims/background: Routine third-trimester ultrasonography is increasingly conducted to screen for foetal growth restriction (FGR) and reduce adverse perinatal and child neurodevelopmental outcomes using timely obstetric management. While it did not reduce adverse perinatal outcomes in previous trials, evidence regarding its association with child neurodevelopmental outcome is absent. We examined whether routine third-trimester ultrasonography is positively associated with child developmental and behavioural/emotional outcomes compared to usual care.

Design/methods: Dutch mothers with a low-risk pregnancy participating in a subsample (n = 1070) of a nationwide cluster-randomised trial reported infant (age 6 months) and toddler (age 28 months) developmental milestones (Ages and Stages Questionnaire) and toddlers' internalising and externalising problems (Child Behavior Checklist). Usual care (n = 380) comprised selective ultrasonography. The intervention strategy (n = 690) included two routine third-trimester ultrasounds next to usual care. Both strategies applied the same interdisciplinary protocol for FGR detection and management.

Results: Adjusted linear mixed-level regressions revealed that routine third-trimester ultrasonography was positively but modestly related to z-standardised infant developmental milestones at 6-month follow-up, B = 0.20, 95%CI [0.07; 0.32], p = 0.003, compared to usual care. At 28-month follow-up, these strategies did not differ in child developmental outcome and internalising and externalising problems.

Conclusion: Routine third-trimester ultrasonography was positively but modestly associated with infant development. In toddlerhood, routine ultrasonography was not related to child developmental and behavioural/emotional outcomes. Overall, these findings do not support the implementation of routine third-trimester ultrasonography for low-risk pregnant women for reasons concerning children's early neurodevelopmental outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology reports and reviews outstanding research on psychological, behavioural, medical and social aspects of human reproduction, pregnancy and infancy. Medical topics focus on obstetrics and gynaecology, paediatrics and psychiatry. The growing work in relevant aspects of medical communication and medical sociology are also covered. Relevant psychological work includes developmental psychology, clinical psychology, social psychology, behavioural medicine, psychology of women and health psychology. Research into psychological aspects of midwifery, health visiting and nursing is central to the interests of the Journal. The Journal is of special value to those concerned with interdisciplinary issues. As a result, the Journal is of particular interest to those concerned with fundamental processes in behaviour and to issues of health promotion and service organization.
期刊最新文献
"Learning to 'waltz' rather than 'wrestle' … " : a novel, ultra-brief intervention supporting early child-caregiver relationships. Prenatal representations link pregnancy intention to observed caregiving. Mental health of parents with infants in NICU receiving cooling therapy for hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Sensory-processing sensitivity, parenting styles, and adult attachment patterns in parents of young children. LBTQ parents' bonding experiences after complicated births: managing minority stress and traumatic experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1