腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血清肿形成的风险因素和临床影响:一项回顾性研究。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY BMC Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02574-1
Hong-Yang Xie, Bin Chen, Jie Shen, Yi-Ping Wang, Wei-Cai Shen, Chun-Shan Dai
{"title":"腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血清肿形成的风险因素和临床影响:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Hong-Yang Xie, Bin Chen, Jie Shen, Yi-Ping Wang, Wei-Cai Shen, Chun-Shan Dai","doi":"10.1186/s12893-024-02574-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) has advantages over open surgery, postoperative seroma formation remains an issue. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and clinical outcomes of seroma formation in patients undergoing LIHR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2016 to March 2023, clinical data of patients who underwent LIHR were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who developed seroma and those who did not were classified into the seroma and non-seroma groups, respectively. The demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for variables of interest. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the risk factors of the binary logistic model, and the cutoff value for each risk factor was obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 128 patients were evaluated. Compared with patients in the non-seroma group, those in the seroma group had a higher body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.001), more direct hernias (P < 0.001), larger hernial orifice size (P < 0.001), more laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP) (P < 0.001), more frequent reduction of hernial sac (P = 0.011), and lower preoperative serum albumin level (PSAL) (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analyses performed on these variables showed that high BMI (P = 0.005), large hernial orifice (P = 0.001), TEP (P = 0.033), and low PSAL (P = 0.009) were risk factors for seroma formation. Compared with the non-seroma group, the seroma group exhibited a higher numerical rating scale score for postoperative pain (P < 0.001), and longer hospital stays (P = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BMI (> 24.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), hernial orifice size (> 2.5 cm), TEP, and PSAL (< 32.5 g/L) were independent risk factors of postoperative seroma formation in patients who underwent LIHR. Although most seromas resolve spontaneously without surgical intervention, seroma formation results in increased patient pain and prolonged hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"24 1","pages":"274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors and clinical impact of seroma formation following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Hong-Yang Xie, Bin Chen, Jie Shen, Yi-Ping Wang, Wei-Cai Shen, Chun-Shan Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12893-024-02574-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) has advantages over open surgery, postoperative seroma formation remains an issue. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and clinical outcomes of seroma formation in patients undergoing LIHR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2016 to March 2023, clinical data of patients who underwent LIHR were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who developed seroma and those who did not were classified into the seroma and non-seroma groups, respectively. The demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for variables of interest. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the risk factors of the binary logistic model, and the cutoff value for each risk factor was obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 128 patients were evaluated. Compared with patients in the non-seroma group, those in the seroma group had a higher body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.001), more direct hernias (P < 0.001), larger hernial orifice size (P < 0.001), more laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP) (P < 0.001), more frequent reduction of hernial sac (P = 0.011), and lower preoperative serum albumin level (PSAL) (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analyses performed on these variables showed that high BMI (P = 0.005), large hernial orifice (P = 0.001), TEP (P = 0.033), and low PSAL (P = 0.009) were risk factors for seroma formation. Compared with the non-seroma group, the seroma group exhibited a higher numerical rating scale score for postoperative pain (P < 0.001), and longer hospital stays (P = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BMI (> 24.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), hernial orifice size (> 2.5 cm), TEP, and PSAL (< 32.5 g/L) were independent risk factors of postoperative seroma formation in patients who underwent LIHR. Although most seromas resolve spontaneously without surgical intervention, seroma formation results in increased patient pain and prolonged hospital stay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443785/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02574-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02574-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR)比开腹手术更具优势,但术后血清肿形成仍是一个问题。本研究旨在探讨腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR)患者血清肿形成的风险因素和临床结果:方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2023年3月期间接受LIHR手术患者的临床数据。将出现血清肿和未出现血清肿的患者分别分为血清肿组和非血清肿组。比较了两组患者的人口统计学特征和临床特征。对相关变量进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析。使用接收者操作特征曲线评估二元逻辑模型的风险因素,并得出每个风险因素的临界值:结果:评估了 128 例患者的数据。与无血清瘤组患者相比,血清瘤组患者的体质指数(BMI)较高(P 结论:血清瘤组患者的体质指数(BMI)高于非血清瘤组患者:体重指数(> 24.5 kg/m2)、疝孔大小(> 2.5 cm)、TEP 和 PSAL (
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk factors and clinical impact of seroma formation following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective study.

Background: Although laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) has advantages over open surgery, postoperative seroma formation remains an issue. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and clinical outcomes of seroma formation in patients undergoing LIHR.

Methods: From January 2016 to March 2023, clinical data of patients who underwent LIHR were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who developed seroma and those who did not were classified into the seroma and non-seroma groups, respectively. The demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for variables of interest. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the risk factors of the binary logistic model, and the cutoff value for each risk factor was obtained.

Results: Data of 128 patients were evaluated. Compared with patients in the non-seroma group, those in the seroma group had a higher body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.001), more direct hernias (P < 0.001), larger hernial orifice size (P < 0.001), more laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP) (P < 0.001), more frequent reduction of hernial sac (P = 0.011), and lower preoperative serum albumin level (PSAL) (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analyses performed on these variables showed that high BMI (P = 0.005), large hernial orifice (P = 0.001), TEP (P = 0.033), and low PSAL (P = 0.009) were risk factors for seroma formation. Compared with the non-seroma group, the seroma group exhibited a higher numerical rating scale score for postoperative pain (P < 0.001), and longer hospital stays (P = 0.032).

Conclusions: BMI (> 24.5 kg/m2), hernial orifice size (> 2.5 cm), TEP, and PSAL (< 32.5 g/L) were independent risk factors of postoperative seroma formation in patients who underwent LIHR. Although most seromas resolve spontaneously without surgical intervention, seroma formation results in increased patient pain and prolonged hospital stay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Impact of overweight on patients undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: analysis of surgical outcomes in a high-volume center. Reappraisal of safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: it is feasible for the pioneer surgical team. Global collaborative research in metabolic and bariatric surgery (GCRMBS): current status and directions for the future. Long-term outcomes of robot versus video-assisted thymectomy for thymic epithelial tumors: a propensity matched analysis. Modified screw-rod fixation for management of posterior pelvic ring fractures: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1