AJCC I-III 期直肠腺癌术前放疗与手术的关联:一项基于人群的研究。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY BMC Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02577-y
Yuhan Wang, Xiaojie Zhu, Weiwei Pan, Zhulin Li, Zhengyu Hu, Bo Hou, Hai Meng
{"title":"AJCC I-III 期直肠腺癌术前放疗与手术的关联:一项基于人群的研究。","authors":"Yuhan Wang, Xiaojie Zhu, Weiwei Pan, Zhulin Li, Zhengyu Hu, Bo Hou, Hai Meng","doi":"10.1186/s12893-024-02577-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the increasing application of neoadjuvant therapy in rectal adenocarcinoma, there remain many controversies in clinical practical applications. Preoperative radiotherapy (PR) can limit the surgical plane and potentially affect the quality of surgical treatment. This study aimed to investigate the potential impact of PR on the surgical quality of rectal adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed the clinicopathological data from 6,585 AJCC stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox proportional were used to assess the impact of PR on survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance the baseline covariates between the PR and non-PR groups and to compare postoperative pathological differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, PR did not improve overall survival (OS) in stages I (p = 0.33), II (p = 0.37), and III (p = 0.14) patients. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that PR was not an independent prognostic factor for patients. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis demonstrated a nonlinear negative correlation between OS hazard ratios and both circumferential resection margin (CRM) and lymph node evaluation (LNE). Compared to the non-PR group, patients in the PR group had lower tumor deposits (TD) (p < 0.001), positive CRM (p = 0.191), and perineural invasion (PNI) (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PR is not an independent prognostic factor for rectal adenocarcinoma patients. However, PR can reduce the likelihood of TD, CRM, and PNI, thereby potentially influencing the quality of surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association of preoperative radiotherapy and surgery for AJCC stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma: a population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Yuhan Wang, Xiaojie Zhu, Weiwei Pan, Zhulin Li, Zhengyu Hu, Bo Hou, Hai Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12893-024-02577-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the increasing application of neoadjuvant therapy in rectal adenocarcinoma, there remain many controversies in clinical practical applications. Preoperative radiotherapy (PR) can limit the surgical plane and potentially affect the quality of surgical treatment. This study aimed to investigate the potential impact of PR on the surgical quality of rectal adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed the clinicopathological data from 6,585 AJCC stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox proportional were used to assess the impact of PR on survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance the baseline covariates between the PR and non-PR groups and to compare postoperative pathological differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, PR did not improve overall survival (OS) in stages I (p = 0.33), II (p = 0.37), and III (p = 0.14) patients. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that PR was not an independent prognostic factor for patients. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis demonstrated a nonlinear negative correlation between OS hazard ratios and both circumferential resection margin (CRM) and lymph node evaluation (LNE). Compared to the non-PR group, patients in the PR group had lower tumor deposits (TD) (p < 0.001), positive CRM (p = 0.191), and perineural invasion (PNI) (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PR is not an independent prognostic factor for rectal adenocarcinoma patients. However, PR can reduce the likelihood of TD, CRM, and PNI, thereby potentially influencing the quality of surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443625/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02577-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02577-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着新辅助治疗在直肠腺癌中的应用日益广泛,临床实际应用中仍存在许多争议。术前放疗(PR)会限制手术平面,并可能影响手术治疗质量。本研究旨在探讨放疗对直肠腺癌手术质量的潜在影响:这项回顾性研究分析了 2010 年至 2015 年期间监控、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中 6585 例 AJCC I-III 期直肠腺癌的临床病理数据。采用卡普兰-梅耶生存分析和多变量考克斯比例来评估PR对生存的影响。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡PR组和非PR组之间的基线协变量,并比较术后病理差异:结果:PSM后,PR并未改善I期(P = 0.33)、II期(P = 0.37)和III期(P = 0.14)患者的总生存期(OS)。多变量 Cox 分析表明,PR 并非患者的独立预后因素。限制立方样条线(RCS)分析表明,OS危险比与周缘切除缘(CRM)和淋巴结评估(LNE)之间存在非线性负相关。与非 PR 组相比,PR 组患者的肿瘤沉积物(TD)较低(P 结论:PR 并不是独立的预后指标:PR不是直肠腺癌患者的独立预后因素。但是,PR 可以降低 TD、CRM 和 PNI 的可能性,从而对手术质量产生潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The association of preoperative radiotherapy and surgery for AJCC stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma: a population-based study.

Background: With the increasing application of neoadjuvant therapy in rectal adenocarcinoma, there remain many controversies in clinical practical applications. Preoperative radiotherapy (PR) can limit the surgical plane and potentially affect the quality of surgical treatment. This study aimed to investigate the potential impact of PR on the surgical quality of rectal adenocarcinoma.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the clinicopathological data from 6,585 AJCC stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox proportional were used to assess the impact of PR on survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance the baseline covariates between the PR and non-PR groups and to compare postoperative pathological differences.

Results: After PSM, PR did not improve overall survival (OS) in stages I (p = 0.33), II (p = 0.37), and III (p = 0.14) patients. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that PR was not an independent prognostic factor for patients. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis demonstrated a nonlinear negative correlation between OS hazard ratios and both circumferential resection margin (CRM) and lymph node evaluation (LNE). Compared to the non-PR group, patients in the PR group had lower tumor deposits (TD) (p < 0.001), positive CRM (p = 0.191), and perineural invasion (PNI) (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: PR is not an independent prognostic factor for rectal adenocarcinoma patients. However, PR can reduce the likelihood of TD, CRM, and PNI, thereby potentially influencing the quality of surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Real-world study on the application of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in video-assisted thoracoscopic day surgery for pulmonary nodule resection. The seven-day cumulative post-esophagectomy inflammatory response predicts cancer recurrence. Seprafilm® and adhesive small bowel obstruction in colorectal/abdominal surgery: an updated systematic review. The safety and efficacy of stapler method for transection of the pancreatic parenchyma during pancreatoduodenectomy (STRAP-PD trial): study protocol for a randomized control trial. Challenges and opportunities for Mohs surgery implementation in African healthcare systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1